Aug 24, 2016
Thanks all, it's encouraging to see so much support and responses
OpenText Functional Testing and Ranorex Studio are leading products competing in the automation testing category. Ranorex may have the upper hand for teams familiar with .NET due to its ease of use, C# scripting, and mobile automation features.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing boasts robust integration features that support a wide range of applications and platforms, making it suitable for organizations requiring extensive compatibility. It also excels in comprehensive automation capabilities and integration with application lifecycle management. Ranorex Studio is praised for its use of C# for scripting, offering simplicity for developers familiar with .NET environments. It provides ease of use and efficient automation for mobile applications, along with strong element recognition capabilities.
Room for Improvement: OpenText users face challenges with high memory usage and slow support response times. There is a need for improved browser compatibility and reduced resource demands. Ranorex users desire better support for macOS and Linux, improved browser compatibility, and more flexible licensing options. Enhancing object recognition and test management can benefit both products.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is mainly deployed on-premises, with some cloud capabilities, but users report slow technical support. Ranorex Studio is often deployed in on-premises environments and is noted for quick issue resolution and efficient customer service, indicating a strong, customer-focused support structure.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is known for being costly with a complex licensing model, though it offers substantial ROI for extensive test automation needs. Meanwhile, Ranorex Studio, while also expensive, provides a balanced licensing model catering to small and large enterprises, offering value to companies working within .NET-based environments. Both products require a detailed upfront investment assessment to ensure expected ROI.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.1% |
| Ranorex Studio | 3.3% |
| Other | 89.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
