SmartBear TestComplete and Qt Squish compete in the software testing space. Qt Squish tends to have the upper hand because of its robust feature set despite SmartBear TestComplete's attractive pricing and support.
Features: SmartBear TestComplete includes scriptless automation, allowing broad testing capabilities across various platforms, and provides an intuitive interface. It is noted for its ease of use and can extensively use externally scripted DLLs. Qt Squish offers strong cross-platform support, seamless integration with different development environments, and effective GUI testing. Its ability to recognize Qt controls, provide behavior-driven development support, and assist with in-depth GUI technology support are highly valued features.
Room for Improvement: SmartBear TestComplete could enhance mobile testing automation and expand its support for legacy systems. Furthermore, it would benefit from improved script stability and more flexible data integration. Qt Squish could improve its initial cost competitiveness and provide more enhanced reporting features. Better handling of visual appearance dependencies and enriched documentation for new users are suggested improvements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SmartBear TestComplete offers a streamlined deployment process and comprehensive customer service, making it accessible for teams of all sizes. Its quick setup process is noted as user-friendly. Qt Squish excels with flexible deployment options and a strong support system that assists during implementation. Its adaptability is favored by teams with complex integration needs.
Pricing and ROI: SmartBear TestComplete is recognized for competitive pricing, with a base license around $4,000, offering a good return on investment through lower upfront costs and subscription models. Qt Squish, although carrying a higher initial cost, justifies this with its extensive feature set deemed worthwhile for projects requiring comprehensive tools, contributing to a preferred choice for demanding testing environments.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
Once set up, only one person is needed to handle all tasks, reducing the requirement for multiple personnel.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SmartBear TestComplete | 6.0% |
| Qt Squish | 2.5% |
| Other | 91.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
Qt Squish is a versatile testing tool that supports Python, integrates with Rational Quality Manager, and handles multiple toolkits. It efficiently boosts code quality with features like auto-completion and a comprehensive dashboard while supporting diverse languages and providing strong documentation.
Qt Squish is known for its robust capability in automatic testing, particularly in GUI and regression testing applications across real-time control, embedded systems, and hybrid frameworks. The tool enables behavior-driven development with Gherkin Syntax, integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, and facilitates effective data-driven and distributed batch testing. Users gain significant value from its compatibility with Qt applications, multiple platforms, extensive language support, and integration with other development tools. Although there are suggestions for improving reporting, configuration for less technical users, Git integration, and object identification, Qt Squish still stands out for its exceptional capability in mapping UI components and supporting automated UI testing.
What are the important features of Qt Squish?Industries such as real-time traffic control, embedded systems, and hybrid applications frequently use Qt Squish for automated testing. The ability to integrate with CI/CD pipelines and compatibility with multiple scripting languages makes it an ideal solution for organizations focusing on GUI and regression testing. Companies benefit from its seamless integration with diverse data sources and development tools, enabling efficient automated UI testing across all relevant platforms.
SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.
SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.
What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
