Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5

What is Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?

Featured Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management reviews

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management in the Vulnerability Management category stands at 2.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management2.9%
Wiz11.7%
Tenable Nessus8.4%
Other77.0%
Vulnerability Management

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryVulnerability ManagementAug 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Tenable NessusAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Qualys VMDRAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs WizAug 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint4.1N/A94%198 interviewsAdd to research
Wiz4.511.7%95%22 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business192
Midsize Enterprise143
Large Enterprise458
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
6%
University
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Retailer
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Construction Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Media Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management with alternative products

Learn more about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

Related questions

 
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Microsoft Solutions Manager at Self-Employed4.5I use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to safeguard customer environments, leveraging its identity focus and automatic remediation features. While effective in many areas, improvements in endpoint defense and next-generation protection would enhance our security strategy on Microsoft Azure.
Senior Cloud Security Consultant at MetLife4.0I primarily use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for endpoint security, leveraging Intune for device onboarding and conducting vulnerability assessments. The recommendations are valuable for fixing vulnerabilities, though automated remediations could be more specific. Our shift from third-party products was due to their challenges.
DGM. Technical Security at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is primarily used for endpoint and identity protection and vulnerability assessment. It is valued for asset discovery and risk prioritization, though improvements are needed in risk scoring and industry-specific insights.
Solution Consultant at BIM Group of Companies4.0Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is essential for my clients needing cybersecurity frameworks knowledge. Its valuable features include CV information and remediation options. However, the portal refresh rate requires improvement as it can take several days to update.
Security Specialist at Prudential Systems Japan3.0I use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for seamless Office 365 integration, appreciating its quick administration and information retrieval. However, it struggles with stability issues, high resource consumption, and lacks efficient Linux management. Previously, I preferred CrossRack for better support.
information Security and IT Manager at Discover Dollar Technologies Pvt Ltd.4.0I use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to assess and notify us of vulnerabilities on various systems constantly. It excels in vulnerability assessment with detailed CVE data, though the dashboard refresh rate and macOS support need improvement. Analyzing ROI is challenging.
EMEAR IT Director at Epson Europe B.v.4.0I rely on Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for endpoint security due to its critical threat intelligence features. Its integration with Sentinel is invaluable, though it's costly. Despite a simple migration from Carbon Black, I'm uncertain about the ROI.
COO at Floating-Dot Technology LTD4.0We use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to enhance our security posture, benefiting from regular advisories and recommendations. As Microsoft partners, we enjoy special discounts, making it cost-effective. A future enhancement could be a more advanced AI agent.