![NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/ya6g62hyudbfvrirpcf7.png?_a=BACAGSGT)
![PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/nPGV9zXshM63E9AMAkt4LLES.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![OpenText Core Application Security vs NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/durwsc3z47nd2vx5dltpkmpv49gk.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
The ability to exploit injection capabilities.
There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC.
What needs improvement?
The vulnerability mapping needs some work.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using it for one year alongside Rapid7.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the available RAM.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's proved to be a fairly stable product.
How are customer service and technical support?
It's fair, although more in-depth usage case studies and documentation are offered for a purchased licence.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did have previous solution, but changed because of a new company policy.
What about the implementation team?
It was implemented in-house.
What other advice do I have?
Perform lots of scans using a testing environment that is fairly closed to the production environment for meaningful results.
