No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (9th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user245400 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product.
The ability to exploit injection capabilities It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC. The vulnerability mapping needs some work. I've been using it for one year alongside Rapid7. There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the…
MH
Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks
I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC."
"Enables automation of different tasks such as authorization testing."
"The solution is reliable, it is very stable."
"I find the attack model quite amazing, where I can write my scripts and load my scripts as well, which helps quite a bit."
"In my area of expertise, I feel like it has almost everything I could possibly require at this moment."
"Burp has several good features; it's cheaper than other solutions and you can scan any number of applications and it updates its database."
"It offers flexibility, macros, and features to reduce the effort required for authenticated sessions."
"With the Extender Tab, if you know how to code then you can create a plugin and add it to Burp."
"There is no other tool like it. I like the intuitiveness and the plugins that are available."
 

Cons

"There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the available RAM."
"The scanner and crawler need to be improved."
"The solution is not easy to set it up. You need a lot of knowledge."
"The one feature that I would like to see in Burp is active scanning of REST based web services."
"The solution isn't too stable; the fundamentals of it make it difficult to use."
"We'd like to have more integration potential across all versions of the product."
"The Initial setup is a bit complex."
"The Iran market does not have after-sales support. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional needs to provide after-sales support."
"One more thing they can improve is that despite having a good architecture, it needs a lot of specification."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Burp Suite is affordable."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is expensive compared to other tools."
"This solution requires a license. It is expensive but you receive a lot of functionality for the price."
"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."
"It is a cheap solution, but it may not be cheaper than other solutions."
"PortSwigger is reasonably-priced. It's fair."
"The solution used to be expensive. However, they have reduced the price to approximately $400.00 which is reasonable."
"It has a yearly license. I am satisfied with its price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?
OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.
What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something...
 

Also Known As

NTOSpider
Burp
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

University of Salzburg, Chr. Hansen, American Chemical Society, North American Retail Chain, Wiltshire Council, Redner's Markets, Acosta Sales & Marketing
Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.