Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
One Identity Safeguard Logo

One Identity Safeguard Reviews

Vendor: One Identity
4.0 out of 5

What is One Identity Safeguard?

Featured One Identity Safeguard reviews

One Identity Safeguard mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category stands at 3.6%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
One Identity Safeguard3.6%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager16.9%
Delinea Secret Server8.0%
Other71.5%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)

PeerResearch reports based on One Identity Safeguard reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPrivileged Access Management (PAM)Aug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOne Identity Safeguard vs CyberArk Privileged Access ManagerAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOne Identity Safeguard vs Delinea Secret ServerAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOne Identity Safeguard vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege ManagerAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
IBM Security QRadar4.0N/A91%209 interviewsAdd to research
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager4.316.9%95%226 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business165
Midsize Enterprise98
Large Enterprise235
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Retailer
5%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Legal Firm
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Construction Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
University
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Insurance Company
1%
Photography Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
 
One Identity Safeguard Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Team Lead / Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0I use One Identity Safeguard for securing privileged accounts in our consultancy company and clients. It offers easy implementation, but improvements are needed in connector customization and threat detection. ROI includes enhanced security despite limited cost reduction.
IAM Specialist4.5I found One Identity Safeguard easy to implement, intuitive, and secure. It offers quick password rotation and session recording, which aids in monitoring. However, unifying its interfaces would improve management. It's cheaper than CyberArk and more secure than Secret Server.
Systems Administrator at a university with 10,001+ employees4.0I use One Identity Safeguard for secure access to Windows and Linux servers, and user account management. It centralizes access and auditing, but onboarding is manual with multiple steps. Improvements are underway, addressing customer feedback, which is promising.
Business Line Manager - IGA & PAM at a tech services company with 201-500 employees4.0As a partner assisting clients with One Identity Safeguard, I find its infrastructure simplicity and robust user experience valuable. While integration between modules could improve, the solution effectively enhances security in password management compared to alternatives like CyberArk.
Executive Director at Semaphore4.0I implemented One Identity Safeguard for a public service organization to manage 800 privileged accounts, enhancing control and replacing old technology. It offers good identity discovery and performance, though SAP integration and logical account grouping guidelines need improvement.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees3.0I primarily use One Identity Safeguard for LDAP and SSH monitoring, although HTTPS implementation is complicated due to unclear documentation. There's room for improvement in disaster recovery and failover processes, and I often compare it to CyberArk for customization.
Senior Vice President (Infrastructure Systems/Information Security) at MAXUT2.5As a partner using One Identity Safeguard for clients, I find its user-friendly interface and effective password vault features critical for managing privileged access. While support could improve, it offers significant ROI and is preferable to CyberArk for ease of use.
Security Architect at a media company with 51-200 employees4.0We use One Identity Safeguard for data protection due to its cost-effective virtual appliance solution. It offers valuable scalability and support, although it could be more user-friendly. We considered the more expensive CyberArk for a robust alternative.