Red Hat AMQ Reviews

Name: Red Hat AMQ
Brand: Red Hat
Rating: 4.1 (10 reviews)

4.1 out of 5

10 reviews
90% willing to recommend

What is Red Hat AMQ?

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Get the Red Hat AMQ Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat AMQ, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, IBM MQ and more!

Red Hat AMQ is the #7 ranked solution in top Message Queue Software. PeerSpot users give Red Hat AMQ an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Red Hat AMQ is most commonly compared to MuleSoft Anypoint Platform: Red Hat AMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform. Red Hat AMQ is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 71% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 24% of all views.

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Featured Red Hat AMQ reviews

Sther Martins

Java Developer at SCCON

We have done around 20 projects in Red Hat AMQ. I have two projects using Red Hat AMQ, and I can share how its scalability has impacted them. In one project, we have a solution for authentication and authorization using SSO. We need to integrate with other systems in two ways. We use Red Hat AMQ for social data, sending messages to other queues, and integrating with business. We have two databases with the same information. The solution is good because it helps us solve problems with messaging. For instance, when messaging doesn't change, we still check the cloud and verify the information. In another project, we have a large banking solution for the Amazon region using Red Hat AMQ for financial transactions. In this solution, business messages are sent, and another system processes them.

Read full review

Bhushan Patil

Director at Absys

We used IBM MQ. The major issue was cost. That's why we chose Red Hat AMQ. Red Hat MQ has multiple components. The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit. Red Hat AMQ includes several queue managers and components like Camel and AMQ, in addition to several queue components.

Read full review

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

I have experience with features such as message persistence and fault tolerance because I configured high availability and fault tolerance for the client environment, including active-active and active-passive configurations. I mainly prefer active-active. I created a security feature for user authentication and authorization in Red Hat AMQ using vault. When you enable the vault, then your whole Red Hat AMQ becomes more secure. Management is straightforward. I configured it and created documentation. The operations team takes care of the operation part. I educate them on how to manage access, so they can easily add new people who join the company or manage the people who leave. The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring. On the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails. It also shows utilization in the tool. These features also come with other AMQs such as Amazon and IBM.

Read full review

Red Hat AMQ mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Red Hat AMQ in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category stands at 9.4%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

PeerResearch reports based on Red Hat AMQ reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Message Queue (MQ) Software	Aug 20, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Aug 20, 2025	Download
Comparison	Red Hat AMQ vs IBM MQ	Aug 20, 2025	Download
Comparison	Red Hat AMQ vs ActiveMQ	Aug 20, 2025	Download
Comparison	Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon SQS	Aug 20, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	4.0	8.6%	92%	59 interviews Add to research
IBM MQ	4.2	26.9%	94%	170 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Red Hat AMQ excels with lightweight configuration, operator-based automation, and seamless OpenShift compatibility. Stability and performance are bolstered by leveraging Apache Kafka and Active MQ. Users appreciate its reliability, scalability, and microservices organization. Its protocols support and cost-effectiveness are noted. Features like message persistence, fault tolerance, user security with vault, and straightforward management enhance its appeal. Users enjoy easy configuration, monitoring capabilities, and integration with OpenShift and other AMQs like Amazon and IBM.

"The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring; on the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails, and it also shows utilization in the tool."
"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."
"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

Room for Improvement

Red Hat AMQ requires improvements in clustering multi-nodes, message ordering, and integration with Service Registry and Jira. Support libraries and the management portal need enhancement. Improving documentation and training is necessary. Better visualization capabilities and a more responsive update cycle would benefit users. Cost efficiency, user-friendly features, and advanced monitoring tools are important. Adoption of new versions is slow. Enhanced developer productivity tools and easier understanding of the licensing structure are also needed.

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."
"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."
"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

Pricing

Enterprise buyers find Red Hat AMQ's pricing competitive and cost-effective compared to others, although there's a consensus that it could be improved, with ratings averaging six out of ten. The open-source nature is appreciated, and the licensing structure is favorable yet complex. Purchasing AMQ with OpenShift is seen as advantageous. Subscription and support plans are required, prompting suggestions for better cost minimization options to attract more customers.

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."
"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."
"The solution is open-source."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Red Hat AMQ for asynchronous messaging, data synchronization, event-driven microservices, and integration across hybrid environments. They leverage its capabilities with Apache Kafka and Active MQ for message queuing and real-time communication on Kubernetes. Common applications include ESB for projects like airports, banking notifications for deposits or withdrawals, and logistics operations for companies like FedEx. AMQ supports various integrations and facilitates message exchange in diverse industry-specific scenarios.

Service and Support

Red Hat AMQ customer service experiences vary. Some users find the support below average, with slow responses and unresolved issues, particularly when infrastructure problems arise. Others rate support as excellent, with timely and effective assistance, praising the thorough documentation. Some users enjoy efficient local support and express satisfaction with the long-term engagement. Overall, technical support is appreciated by many, although experiences can differ based on individual needs and circumstances.

Deployment

Many users found Red Hat AMQ's initial setup straightforward and easy, especially within OpenShift and Kubernetes environments. Some encountered complexity, needing customization and management. One team needed a week for AMQ Streams deployment, later adding custom self-service features over six months. Deployment ease varied across environments. One group found the OpenShift operator convenient for standard deployment. A few encountered challenges with bugs and recurring configuration issues, necessitating multiple reinstalls.

Scalability

Red Hat AMQ shows strong scalability with a flexible design supporting a range of projects and users. It efficiently handles messaging needs and integrates well with various systems. Companies have seen increasing usage and adoption, highlighting its scalable nature. The flexibility for both cloud and on-premise environments is noteworthy, aiding diverse business processes like authentication, authorization, and financial transactions. Various technical users have successfully implemented it across different projects, affirming its robust scalability.

Stability

Red Hat AMQ is mostly praised for its stability, with numerous users reporting reliable performance without downtime or bugs. Some users experience occasional minor issues, yet they achieve stable operation levels and experience no service interruptions. Others have found AMQ highly stable in production environments. Feedback indicates confidence in its reliability and scalability, underpinning its selection by significant operations like a busy airport in Mumbai. However, there are mentions of instability with message loss from some.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Red Hat AMQ Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.