Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
StorMagic SvSAN Logo

StorMagic SvSAN Reviews

Vendor: StorMagic
4.3 out of 5

What is StorMagic SvSAN?

Featured StorMagic SvSAN reviews

StorMagic SvSAN mindshare

Product category:
As of September 2025, the mindshare of StorMagic SvSAN in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category stands at 5.4%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Defined Storage (SDS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
StorMagic SvSAN5.4%
Red Hat Ceph Storage18.9%
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct7.3%
Other68.4%
Software Defined Storage (SDS)

PeerResearch reports based on StorMagic SvSAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySoftware Defined Storage (SDS)Sep 1, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 1, 2025Download
ComparisonStorMagic SvSAN vs StarWind Virtual SANSep 1, 2025Download
ComparisonStorMagic SvSAN vs Red Hat Ceph StorageSep 1, 2025Download
ComparisonStorMagic SvSAN vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)Sep 1, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
VMware vSAN4.2N/A87%232 interviewsAdd to research
Red Hat Ceph Storage4.218.9%82%27 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business109
Midsize Enterprise66
Large Enterprise176
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
9%
Government
7%
Construction Company
6%
Educational Organization
4%
Performing Arts
3%
University
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare StorMagic SvSAN with alternative products

Learn more about StorMagic SvSAN

StorMagic SvSAN customers

Related questions

 
StorMagic SvSAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Information Technology Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.0As a small oil and gas company, I find StorMagic SvSAN valuable for its user-friendly design and quick setup, completing installation in 4-6 hours. Perpetual licensing is beneficial for remote operations, though improved pre-configured scenarios would enhance efficiency.
Global Data Center & Disaster Recovery Manager at Curium Pharma4.0We use StorMagic SvSAN for our small manufacturing sites due to its ease of implementation and cost-effectiveness. It offers virtualization without hardware constraints, reducing maintenance costs, although improvements in Edge Control capabilities would enhance configuration management.
Consultant at a transportation company with 1-10 employees4.5I deployed StorMagic SvSAN in ROBO locations for its cost-effectiveness and easy installation on two VMware ESXi hosts. Its simplicity is a major asset but it needs better integration with monitoring tools. It offers great cost-efficiency compared to VMware vSAN and Nutanix.
Senior Solution Consultant at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5I use StorMagic SvSAN primarily for its cost-effective hyperconverged system suitable for VMware. It excels in reliability for small and medium-sized enterprises, though scalability and licensing costs for expanding beyond two nodes need improvement.
Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees4.5As a distributor, I find StorMagic SvSAN offers a user-friendly hyperconverged infrastructure, comparable to Nutanix and VMware, with approximately 40% ROI. While scalable enterprise modeling and enhanced training are needed, it remains a cost-effective solution.
Information Technology Infrastructure Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees5.0I implemented StorMagic SvSAN across global manufacturing sites to meet our local software needs without buying dedicated storage. It's flexible, stable, and cost-effective, offering a two-year ROI, though hardware compatibility and pricing could improve.
Network Engineer at a legal firm with 201-500 employees5.0I use StorMagic SvSAN with VMware servers to share local storage among hosts, appreciating its simplicity and cost savings of $20,000 to $30,000 annually. Despite this, it needs improved security. I chose it over VMware vSAN due to superior service.
IT Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5We use StorMagic SvSAN for big data storage and Windows cluster storage for SQL databases. The implementation was initially challenging, but assistance from StorMagic engineers was invaluable. Simplifying implementation and training could enhance the experience further.