No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] Logo

Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
3.9 out of 5

What is Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL]?

Featured Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] reviews

PeerResearch reports based on Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryManaged Security Services Providers (MSSP)Mar 30, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 30, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Wipro Managed Security Services0.00.8%0%0 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 26, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Compare Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] with alternative products

Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] customers

Related questions

 
Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Science Technician at a government with 201-500 employees4.5I highly recommend this solution for its fantastic firewall, ease of use, and good stability. While setup is straightforward, reporting functionality needs improvement. My main concern is the high cost, which has me considering other options.
CEO at PANZER IT3.5I find this solution versatile, stable, and its features are good, leveraging its strong brand. However, its ransomware protection is average, technical support is poor, and it needs bundling for full protection.
Technical Manager at vst4.0I use this security solution for clients, finding its management portal and ease of use valuable. However, I'm concerned about zero-day response and the poor, slow technical support, which makes me not recommend it currently.
Information Security Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I highly recommend Symantec Cyber Security Services, rating it 9/10 for its feature-rich, stable, and scalable nature. However, I believe its reporting capabilities need significant improvement to match competitors, and it should focus more on cloud services.
Senior Manager - Cyber Security at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees2.5I primarily used this for antivirus and device management. Though device control was good, poor stability, high memory usage affecting performance, and scalability issues were major concerns, leading me to switch.
Endpoint Specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.0I find this solution's firewall and IPS valuable and it's stable. However, I need better integration and a single dashboard. My biggest complaint is the very poor technical support.