VMware Cloud Foundation Reviews

Many report varied ROI experiences from VMware Cloud Foundation. Some indicate they have not yet achieved complete ROI, attributing it to time needed for full recovery. Savings range from 30 to 40 percent, primarily through reduced ticket numbers and infrastructure efficiencies. While the platform's cost is seen as high, several note it indirectly reduces costs due to time savings. However, a few calculate return percentages between 10 to 15, without evaluating overall cost-effectiveness.

VMware Cloud Foundation is perceived as expensive by enterprises, yet many find value in its extensive features and overall cost efficiency compared to higher-priced converged infrastructure alternatives. Users frequently mention high annual licensing fees, especially after Broadcom's acquisition. While bundled licensing offers savings, purchasing components separately is costly. Despite this, the robust support and operational capabilities justify the pricing for some. Competitors like AWS and Nutanix are often seen as more cost-effective due to their pricing models.

• "The tool's price is slightly on the higher side, but I guess you think there is no one-to-one comparison with other tools. The licensing part has become easier, while earlier, it was quite complex."
• "It is quite expensive."
• "The solution’s pricing could be improved and made more flexible."

VMware Cloud Foundation is utilized for infrastructure servicing, data center consolidation, disaster recovery, and cloud migration. Users employ it for automation, private cloud creation, VDI environments, and upgrading infrastructure. Clients value its scalability, ease of use, centralized management, and its capability to integrate with public cloud environments like Azure and AWS. It supports various workloads, aids in SDDC implementations, and enables the seamless transition of resources across environments.

VMware Cloud Foundation's support is generally well-received, praised for responsiveness and problem-solving capabilities. They exhibit professionalism, though service quality can vary. Some users have found changes in procedures and potential delays frustrating. They appreciate prioritized assistance for critical issues but express a desire for improvements in service speed and comprehensive engineer expertise. Rating opinions vary, usually between satisfactory to excellent, with evaluations ranging from three to ten. Support partnerships and professional services are noted positively.

Users find VMware Cloud Foundation's initial setup to be generally straightforward but occasionally complex, influenced by the installer's experience. Automation aids efficiency, though diverse skills in data center and networking are crucial. Installation durations vary from hours to weeks, often needing multiple team members for management and execution. Automated deployments and pre-written scripts enhance ease, yet configuration complexities can arise, emphasizing the importance of knowledge and training.

VMware Cloud Foundation exhibits a strong capacity to scale, accommodating both small and enterprise-level operations. It offers easy expansion, horizontal and vertical scaling, and is suitable for various architecture sizes. However, scalability depends on factors such as hardware and licensing. Many users praise its ease and adaptability, but some note potential limitations based on infrastructure components. It effectively supports company growth but may encounter restrictions due to its licensing model.

VMware Cloud Foundation is recognized for its stability. Many rate it high, with most scoring between eight and ten out of ten. There are no major issues with bugs, glitches, or crashes. Stability concerns mostly arise during migration from on-premises setups. Well-deployed and managed, it performs reliably. Updates are frequent, and customers maintain older environments without significant issues. For some, interdependencies within VMware require technical coordination if issues arise.