Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
webMethods.io Logo

webMethods.io Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is webMethods.io?

Featured webMethods.io reviews

webMethods.io mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of webMethods.io in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category stands at 8.3%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
webMethods.io8.3%
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps13.6%
Boomi iPaaS11.6%
Other66.5%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

PeerResearch reports based on webMethods.io reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIntegration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)Aug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonwebMethods.io vs Microsoft Azure Logic AppsAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonwebMethods.io vs MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonwebMethods.io vs SAP Cloud PlatformAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)4.0N/A93%186 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure API Management3.9N/A91%82 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise45
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business374
Midsize Enterprise167
Large Enterprise995
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Retailer
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
University
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare webMethods.io with alternative products

Learn more about webMethods.io

webMethods.io customers

Related questions

 
webMethods.io Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Sales Director at Proven Consult5.0My experience with webMethods.io highlights its valuable features, such as caching, data transformation, and secure connectivity. However, it could improve in advanced monitoring, analytics, performance, and integrating with applications like ServiceNow and OCR capabilities.
Information Technology Specialist at PACI5.0We use webMethods.io to automate e-residency processes in Kuwait, offering 235 services across government sectors. While it's a powerful and easy-to-use tool, we believe a price reduction of 30% to 50% would be beneficial.
Senior Consultant at Brillio4.0I used webMethods.io for integrating APIs and database event triggers in my organization, valuing its orchestration, integration, and logging features. However, the high licensing cost is a drawback. I chose it over other solutions for its smooth integration and scalability.
Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees4.0I primarily use webMethods.io for supporting business applications and customer lookups. The messaging feature is highly valuable, though infrastructure patching could be smoother and authentication needs improvement. I've seen a positive Return on Investment with this solution.
Readiness Manager/Business Analytics for GCC India Operations at Ericsson3.5The product supports various digital documents like XMLs and EDI. However, the version upgrade process needs improvement, as it's challenging for customers, taking six months to a year, complicating transition and posing cost issues due to competition.
Owner at UrbanTech Services4.5I've found webMethods.io valuable for API management due to its governance and security features. The API Gateway enhances flexibility, though the high price is a concern. In two and a half years, it covered 38% of its cost.
Client Partner at Tech Mahindra Limited4.5I chose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface and rapid deployment features, which facilitate seamless communication and governance. However, compatibility with legacy systems poses challenges, requiring effort to adapt diverse products and optimize costs for integration.
Head of Division at Innovery4.0I primarily use webMethods ActiveTransfer for file transfers internally and externally. It excels in integration and ease of use but struggles with large files and protocol support, impacting ROI and requiring architectural improvements to stay competitive with other solutions.