Amazon API Gateway and webMethods.io compete in the API management and integration market. Amazon API Gateway appears to have an advantage due to its seamless AWS integration and cost-effectiveness, while webMethods.io stands out in enterprise integrations with its B2B partner capabilities and support for legacy systems.
Features: Amazon API Gateway offers seamless integration with AWS services like Lambda, robust security features, and cost-effective pricing. It is user-friendly, supports quick deployment, and integrates well with AWS applications. webMethods.io excels in providing extensive B2B partner integration, efficient data mapping, and versatile connectors for complex enterprise integrations. It ensures stability, built-in monitoring, and compatibility with various legacy systems.
Room for Improvement: Amazon API Gateway needs improvements in documentation and user interface, better governance, monitoring features, and pricing for high-volume data processing. webMethods.io could enhance its pricing structure, simplify complex setup, and improve legacy system support. It also requires better orchestration capabilities and more modern user interfaces for ease of use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon API Gateway offers flexible deployment options primarily in public cloud environments within AWS's ecosystem, with support often limited to self-service and email, leading to some delays. webMethods.io provides various deployment models including on-premises and hybrid, with robust technical support praised for assistance, although quicker response times and improved documentation are suggested by some users.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon API Gateway operates on a pay-per-use model, offering cost management flexibility, though it can be expensive for high data volumes. Users find satisfactory ROI, especially when leveraging the AWS ecosystem. webMethods.io, while offering strong capabilities, faces criticism for high pricing and complex licensing structures. Costs are justified for large enterprises benefiting from its features and scalability, though a competitive pricing model is suggested to enhance value.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Within 15 minutes, we had a support engineer allocated via Amazon, and we were able to resolve the issue promptly.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
If you have a tier-one partnership, the support has been phenomenal.
It is very scalable, and we don't need to hire additional engineers.
We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute.
I haven't observed any significant issues indicating a lack of scalability, as it can be efficiently managed through configurations.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
AWS charges for data ingress and egress, which could be further reduced.
It's important to consider the type of gateway endpoint carefully.
webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
It is expensive.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
Additionally, it's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased.
It acts as a master tool, offering easy configuration and excellent integration capabilities with third-party services.
The solution is solid, robust, and scalable.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
Amazon API Gateway facilitates internal APIs exposure to external users, manages requests, and enhances security with authentication. It efficiently handles serverless architectures with AWS Lambda integration, supporting cloud-based API management.
Amazon API Gateway acts as a gateway for backend microservices, making it suitable for real-time use cases. It enables secure communication, traffic routing, and access control management. With its strength in integrating AWS services, it offers excellent scalability, proxy capabilities, and cost-effective management. Users have noted areas for improvement, such as pricing, interface, and the need for better AI-based capabilities. Improvements are also sought in monitoring, security features, and support services.
What features make Amazon API Gateway stand out?Industries utilize Amazon API Gateway to streamline operations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech, focusing on real-time data processing and secure communication. The gateway's ability to manage traffic and provide robust security features is key in industries requiring dependable and versatile API management solutions.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
