I'm using TCDs and OCDs, and these are the two high-performance systems.
We have our business applications running on EC2.
I'm using TCDs and OCDs, and these are the two high-performance systems.
We have our business applications running on EC2.
EC2 does have not many features. Normally, we do elastic load balancing, which is great.
The implementation is very easy. It's quick and easy to deploy.
It's quite stable.
We find it easy to scale.
We don't have any issues with the solution. Nothing is really missing in terms of features.
I've been using the solution for many years now.
The product is 100% stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
The solution scales quite well, and it is easy to expand.
It's very easy to add to what is already there. You just have to add memory and storage and restart the instance.
We have more than 100 people using the solution.
While we do not have plans to increase usage at this time, we may do so in a year.
We've been happy with technical support. They are very helpful and responsive.
Positive
The solution is straightforward to set up. It's not overly complex. We can deploy the solution in just ten to 15 minutes. It's very fast.
The maintenance is very easy. If we need help, we can always contact support for guidance.
I was able to implement the solution myself.
We've seen some ROI. It's saved us a lot of time on our side.
The cost is moderate. It's not too high or too low. It's based on usage. While using AWS cloud ensures there are no hidden costs, if you use other clouds, there might be.
We did look into other options before choosing EC2.
We're customers.
I'm using a normal regular EC2. I'm not using containers.
On the cloud, we use both Amazon and Azure as our cloud.
I'd recommend the solution as it is scalable, readily available, and offers good cost savings. People who know AWS have been very happy with the experience.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
I use this solution in my personal capacity for computing capacity. I use the free tier service.
I like EC2 because of its simple workload and the ability to configure VPCs and security groups.
This solution could be improved with better pricing. If you continue using this solution over a long period of time, your costs may accumulate. I would also like a way to move my on-prem workload into the cloud.
I have been using this solution for one year.
This is a stable solution.
Yes, this is a scalable solution. You can configure the solution for auto-scaling which scales any available resource that you want.
I have not had any reason to contact tech support.
The initial setup is very straightforward. It took five minutes for me to set it up.
I completed this myself as I use this solution for personal use.
I use the free tier, although I have paid for some services that are not free. The overall cost of this solution depends on the services you use.
I would recommend Amazon EC2 to other people.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
We don't use all the many features of EC2, we use it mainly for standalone application deployments, and we have auto-scaled and configured it for data storage. It's a domain use case, so we are deploying some specific applications in EC2, and maintaining them.
I like that we can change the configuration whenever we need. We can scale up our requirement so that if we want to add more CPU, we can do it. If we want to add more memory or backup features, we can do that. We're also able to configure some elastic file system so that we can extend the memory or the space in which we want to store the data. That elasticity is quite a dynamic configuration of the machine and a feature we use often. Amazon provides good tutorials and free access to them for a year.
Amazon has a very dynamic IP. Whenever we restart the machine, the IP gets changed. If you're using a cheaper machine IP, the configuration has to be changed. There are workarounds but it's an issue that could easily be solved. It would be great if Amazon could add additional services into the free tier so that people can explore and add to their knowledge base.
We've been using this solution for two years.
The stability is very good. We haven't faced any downtime or glitches.
This solution is very scalable.
We have not had to connect with the support team because they provide us with a platform for self-service.
The initial setup is very easy and takes about half a day. We're also able to configure some scripts for auto setup. We used one DevOps person from our team to implement the solution. We have automated most things so there's no requirement for maintenance. The solution doesn't require constant monitoring.
I rate this solution nine out of 10.
We use Amazon EC2 for Windows and Linux systems. Additionally, we use it for UAT and load balancing.
Amazon EC2 could improve by having integration with other cloud systems, such as Azure, and Google Cloud which would be good. Additionally, having integration with on-premise systems would be appreciated.
Most of the clients are worried about getting completely dependent on a cloud provider. For example, if you develop everything using Amazon AWS services, then you get stuck with them, that's a worry today. There are people who are asking for cloud-agnostic implementation or services.
I have been using Amazon EC2 for approximately four years.
Amazon EC2 is stable.
The scalability of Amazon EC2 is good. However, the stability can depend on what service I am using.
The support is very good, they are customer friendly and use case-based experience.
I rate the support from Amazon EC2 a four out of five.
Positive
The initial setup of Amazon EC2 it's not straightforward. You need an Amazon AWS engineer to use it because there is a steep learning curve. It's not very difficult to find someone with AWS skillsets.
After four years of use if we want to log and create an EC2 instance it is very easy. Once you have a solution architect or you have an Amzon AWS engineer on your team, it's easier to do.
I would recommend this solution to others and Azure. This is a fantastic solution, it provides the basic requirement for any cloud. They make available computing space or a server to use for customers.
I rate Amazon EC2 an eight out of ten.
We are using Amazon EC2 for computing.
The most valuable features of Amazon EC2 are content delivery and adaptability.
I have been using Amazon EC2 for approximately two months.
Amazon EC2 could improve the stability.
The scalability of Amazon EC2 is good.
I have not used technical support from Amazon EC2.
I did not use other solutions prior to using Amazon EC2.
I am using the tier three Amazon service. I am not going to use another solution other than Amazon EC2 because here in Pakistan there are some payment issues for solutions abroad.
I rate Amazon EC2 a nine out of ten.
Our primary use case is for migrating Linux boxes to Windows boxes. We deal mainly with small and medium-sized businesses that are looking to move away from on-prem hardware to the cloud. We are customers and I'm an MSP architect.
The most valuable feature of this product is its reliability. Its ethernet configuration is stable and they provide good technical support.
I'd like to see more tools to help our clients minimize their costs. The company could provide tips on savings. A couple of our clients have taken a pay-as-you-go model when they configure and they're paying a lot more money than they need to.
The solution is stable as is the backend infrastructure.
The scalability is good whether you scale horizontally or vertically. A couple of clients scale out horizontally and the load balances help with that.
Customer support is actually quite good. They've been able to fix or guide me on the solution.
I have experience with this product so the initial setup is easy for me. Some small businesses have their IT people, but others don't have the knowledge so I carry out an assessment for them. My medium sized clients have a couple of IT people who maintain the network side of things and the instances or the server aspect. If they have applications, then they have their own application people that take care of the application. Maintenance requires around three to five people.
The cost varies depending on how many instances you have and how long you run it. Our most recent customers were running around four instances, and their bill was between $1,500 to $2,000.
It's important to have somebody familiar with the solution on board, especially if it's an organization that wants to move quickly.
I rate this solution nine out of 10.
We had a client which has a legacy application that wanted to move to the cloud without a cloud-native solution. What they did was they moved to Amazon EC2 and asked for virtual machines. They had an Oracle database and licenses, they were all provided by the client, and then they all moved to the Amazon EC2 environment.
Amazon EC2's most valuable feature I have heard from clients is easy provisioning. Provisioning is very quick and easy.
Amazon EC2 could improve by reducing the price.
I have been using Amazon EC2 for approximately two years.
Amazon EC2 is stable.
The scalability of Amazon EC2 is good.
Our client was a large company with approximately 1,000 using the solution.
The support from Amazon EC2 is good.
The ROI is similar to an on-premise version of my client's operations.
The clients have found the billing of Amazon EC2 good, but the price could be less high. There is a monthly subscription to use the solution.
We have difficulty convincing potential clients of the benefits of using Amazon EC2, from their on-premise setup, when the cost is similar. They don't see the benefits. We face a lot of issues convincing them
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Amazon EC2 an eight out of ten.
We use EC2 for test and dev environments.
EC2 has the typical advantages of using the cloud. It's easy to provision and set up.
I would like to see more variety in the operating system images used to create test environments in EC2. There should be more versions and releases. Sometimes, you want to test an update from an old release to a higher version, but you can’t do that with the new images available. You have to use your own.
I have used EC2 for three or four years.
Amazon EC2 is stable.
EC2 is scalable. There is an auto-scale setting in the configuration.
I've never had to use tech support. I think most of the documentation is adequate.
Setting up EC2 is straightforward. It takes a few minutes, and you can do it by yourself.
Pricing is based on consumption, so when we don't want to use it, we just turn it off. The expense is negligible.
We pay for a monthly license. The price is fair.
I would rate Amazon EC2 nine out of 10.
