Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Apache Subversion Logo

Apache Subversion Reviews

Vendor: Apache
3.5 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Apache Subversion?

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)
Get the Version Control Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion, GitHub, Bitbucket and more!
Apache Subversion is the #10 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions. PeerSpot users give Apache Subversion an average rating of 7.0 out of 10. Apache Subversion is most commonly compared to GitHub: Apache Subversion vs GitHub.
Buyer's Guide
Version Control
March 2026
Get the category report
Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Featured Apache Subversion reviews

Read more reviews

Apache Subversion mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Apache Subversion in the Version Control category stands at 4.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apache Subversion4.2%
Bitbucket15.9%
Bitbucket Server12.2%
Other67.7%
Version Control
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Apache Subversion offers benefits such as ease of installation, configuration, and user friendliness. The centralized version control allows multiple teams to connect, collaborate, and contribute via a central server. CLI is also highlighted as a key feature. Organizations use Apache Subversion for source and configuration management, implementing hooks, integrating with JIRA, and writing custom scripts. It serves as a platform to host and maintain code versions, ensuring code availability even if individual systems fail.
  • "The ease of installation, configuration, and user friendliness."
  • "As an open source solution it's very effective, will be very useful for individual and for small teams."
  • "I find the strong point of Apache Subversion to be that it is a centralized version control system, allowing us to keep our code repositories at a central server."

Room for Improvement

Apache Subversion requires updates for enhanced user-friendliness and stability. Complex merging, deployment, and enterprise functionalities need refinement. Comparisons with GitHub and GitLab highlight necessary features like CI/CD integrations, artifact storage, and pipeline triggers. Configuration and customization options should expand, matching GitHub Actions' immediacy. Incorporating basic elements like pull requests and better version control is essential. Advanced build and deployment servers are often desired, emphasizing the need for modern feature integration.
  • "Its handling of complex merging needs work."
  • "It's easy, cost effective but not a enterprise tool therefore the community has to work with that direction."
  • "The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."

ROI

Apache Subversion is effective as an open source option for individuals and small teams. It requires no budgeted costs, making it attractive for cost-conscious users. However, users reported no significant return on investment or cost savings after its implementation. Some users are transitioning to Bitbucket for better CI/CD integrations and deployment, indicating a preference for alternatives with enhanced features. Apache Subversion's pricing is low, but it's incomparable with other platforms due to its niche advantages.

Pricing

Apache Subversion is an open-source tool, allowing enterprises to only incur development and maintenance expenses without any licensing fees. Organizations find the pricing favorable and are satisfied with the low costs compared to alternative products. It is well-regarded for its cost-effectiveness in enterprise settings.
  • "The tool's price is good."

Popular Use Cases

Users primarily utilize Apache Subversion for version control and managing source code changes. It is frequently employed in both small and large projects to track revisions, merge conflicts, and collaborate across teams. Apache Subversion assists in ensuring code integrity, maintaining historical records, and managing multiple code branches efficiently. Users appreciate its role in streamlining workflows and improving collaborative development efforts.

Service and Support

Customer service and support of Apache Subversion receive mixed feedback. Some find value in community assistance, while others praise technical support during migration periods, rating it high. Many rely on online information or do not use official support. Experiences are diverse, with some rating the support at 8/10, indicating satisfaction, while others rate it lower, around 5/10. User experiences show varied engagement with Apache for direct support needs.

Deployment

Documentation for Apache Subversion's initial setup is user-friendly, making it straightforward for those deploying it. Developers often leave setup tasks to DevOps Engineers, focusing on other responsibilities. Deployment is typically handled by specialized roles, indicating that while the setup process is accessible, it usually involves personnel with relevant deployment expertise.

Scalability

Apache Subversion is regarded as a highly scalable tool by users. Companies have experienced effective scalability, even with multiple instances and numerous users per instance. Users have expressed high satisfaction, rating the scalability experience as excellent. No usage issues were reported, indicating a robust performance even when used by teams involving numerous developers.

Stability

Users mention varying experiences with Apache Subversion's stability. Some encounter frequent issues, while others report no issues. Some rate its stability a six out of ten, while others give it an eight.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Version Control Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Compare Apache Subversion with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Apache Subversion

Apache Subversion customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Related questions

  • 35
When evaluating Version Control, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 33
Why is Version Control important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Version Control

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
GitHub vs Apache Subversion Logo
GitHub vs Apache Subversion
Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion Logo
Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion
Git vs Apache Subversion Logo
Git vs Apache Subversion
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion
See all alternatives
 
Apache Subversion Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis3.0I've used Apache Subversion for over three years to manage centralized code repositories, but despite its reliability, it lacks modern features like CI/CD integration, leading us to gradually transition to platforms like Bitbucket for better functionality.
Senior Content Developer at Kinaxis3.5I use Apache Subversion as a code repository for training materials. The most valuable feature is its command-line interface, although the deployment process is complex. I have not considered or used any other solutions or cloud providers for this purpose.
Engineering Manager at Docaposte3.0I use Apache Subversion for code distribution, but I find Git more flexible due to its local repository feature. Subversion's stability and ease of use need improvement. Despite its simplicity compared to Git, I haven't seen a return on investment.
Assistant Director Implementation Services at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5I've used this free, easy-to-install, and user-friendly solution for four years with no issues, making onboarding new joiners simple. My only criticism is its handling of complex merging.
Tech Lead at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees3.5I found this open-source SCM tool easy for configuration management, though I experienced many stability and scalability issues. It's effective for individuals and small teams, but not an enterprise solution.