No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

What is Apica?

Get the report
Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Featured Apica reviews

Apica mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of Apica in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category stands at 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apica0.7%
Dynatrace5.5%
Datadog4.7%
Other89.1%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

PeerResearch reports based on Apica reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Performance Monitoring (APM) and ObservabilityMay 9, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonApica vs DatadogMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonApica vs DynatraceMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonApica vs Splunk AppDynamicsMay 9, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Wazuh3.7N/A81%50 interviewsAdd to research
Datadog4.34.7%97%210 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business54
Midsize Enterprise33
Large Enterprise87
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Construction Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
Performing Arts
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Retailer
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
University
2%
Media Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Agriculture
2%
Government
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%

Compare Apica with alternative products

Learn more about Apica

Apica customers

Related questions

 
Apica Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Associate Vice President at Wells Fargo4.5I find Apica valuable for validating content and performing login functionalities in applications, with its ability to record front-end checks. However, it requires a robust ID management system for tasks needing proper human IDs, especially in HR functions.
Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM3.0I use Apica for performance and automation testing, appreciating its ease in recording APIs and enhancing scripts. Although it requires other tools for endurance testing and uses an outdated scripting language, Apica handles complex flows and file uploads efficiently.
Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys4.0I use Apica for automation and continuous monitoring of applications. It offers easy script creation with drag-and-drop options and effective real-time monitoring. However, ZebraTester needs improvement due to its complexity and lack of documentation.
Senior Performance Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees4.0I used Apica for performance testing in my last project, appreciating its load generation capabilities and ability to capture requests and responses. However, unlike LoadRunner, it lacks automatic correlation features, making initial scripting somewhat challenging.
Software Associate at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Apica in my company for performance testing, finding it more feature-rich compared to NeoLoad, JMeter, and LoadRunner, especially for scripting and input files. However, it needs improvement in capturing input file paths.
Performance Tester at MetLife3.5I use Apica for developing UI scripts and API tests. I value the automatic backend handling, easy setup, and results presentation. However, it's not very user-friendly and could improve in request/response details and header correlation. Previously, I used LoadRunner and JMeter.
QA Automation Engineer at Good Work Hub3.0I used Apica for load testing during a project shift from London to Africa. Despite being newer and less advanced than LoadRunner, its scripting ease and responsive development team made it beneficial, although initially challenging due to its early development stage.
Application performance tester at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees4.5I've been using Apica for performance testing, appreciating its user-friendly interface which doesn't require scripting knowledge. However, it's costly and lacks mobile application testing capabilities, focusing only on APIs and applications.