What is our primary use case?
Ensuring our vulnerability management program is adequate, with great real-time reporting on various risks to our environment, is one of the main use cases for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, along with the timeliness of mitigating those risks or escalations in our incident response program.
What is most valuable?
Their staff is timely, being an extension of the team in escalations that can get verified in real time and escalated quickly when needed, which are some of the better features of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk.
There are benefits regarding the integration capabilities due to the way the dashboard is set up, which is pretty easy and intuitive. Their team is helpful. Our team works directly with them, so there is a lot of good one-on-one communication, especially monthly updates that we can look back on and do check-ins. They are really good about their program, looking at each of these various areas to focus on.
The user-friendly interface and customizable reporting helped our IT team interpret and act on the platform's insights because they did not have any problems using it. It took a little time when first getting on the platform to understand how to use it, but that is similar to any tool. Once they were on it, they did not have any problem navigating through the screens and understanding the data.
What needs improvement?
The integration capabilities of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk with our existing security tools or workflows could be enhanced. They have their own methodology for vulnerability scanning and reporting, but while we can integrate ours as well, I would prefer to see that capability improved.
The dashboard and reporting part of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs improvement. From a technical aspect, it is very good, but there are some things where the security team needs to dig in a little bit on how they might manipulate the data coming out. It is a very good platform for investigating and managing risk.
For how long have I used the solution?
For how long have I used the solution?
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
It was not complex to set up Arctic Wolf Managed Risk. We paid for them to help us, so we received the support we needed to do so.
How are customer service and support?
We thought that Arctic Wolf Managed Risk support was very responsive. Over the past two and a half years, there have probably only been two times that we might have been disappointed with an escalation, but their support staff has been very good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did a comparison of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of the product to two or three other competitors, and we found Arctic Wolf Managed Risk to be very competitive. They were not the lowest, but they were not the highest, so that is why we chose them.
What other advice do I have?
It is a bit hard to quantify how Arctic Wolf Managed Risk has positively impacted our organization overall. I cannot put that into any kind of quantifiable reason, but overall, it has done its job because we could mitigate that risk.
Nothing else comes to mind for improvements with the Arctic Wolf Managed Risk product.
On a scale of 1-10, I rate Arctic Wolf Managed Risk an 8.5.