We have used this solution mostly for small businesses.
The primary use case of this solution is for connecting computers to a network.
We have used this solution mostly for small businesses.
The primary use case of this solution is for connecting computers to a network.
Our clients have not provided any feedback. What they are interested in is that it is working and runs their network with no interruptions. This is why we purchase these switches for our customers.
It is not as good as the original switches Cisco previously had but it is better than other solutions.
Some of these switches are still using a GUI interface, but I would prefer using the command line interface like the original system.
Lynksys are only switches using the GUI interface.
Scalability-wise, this solution is not designed for small businesses.
This solution is stable and it runs without any interruptions.
This solution is scalable, but it depends on the business and the market. Some devices are oriented for the SMB market and not scalable.
There are other devices installed in companies where scalability is possible but it is not something that happens often.
We use the old Cisco devices for clients who have more users and want to expand because they have more scalability features.
Our clients have between five and twenty users.
I have not used and technical support services. I have not needed to.
The initial setup was straightforward.
I know the technology and how it works so it was very easy to setup. Even the online setup is easy and straightforward.
I completed the implementation for our customers. I am the system engineer and provide this service for all of my clients.
Most of the clients don't understand what is going on with the devices. They would need help if they were to do implement it on their own.
It's an affordable price for small companies using on-premises networks where cloud services are too expensive for them.
Linksys is still on the market, but it's more Cisco now. It all depends on the customer's needs and budget.
The problem is the Java installation because most of them rely on Java, and that is the problem with all devices.
If you want a new modern dashboard or management utility, you have to replace the devices.
It's not easy to improve all of the functionalities, and there are new devices on the market.
It cannot be changed and we understand that.
Some devices have more features than what the customer needs or can use.
The computers are more powerful than the capabilities of the ordinary user.
They have already improved. I recently installed a Cisco device, the Cisco FirePower, and it's completely different they are not reliant on Java as they were before.
New devices have a new approach in the next generation in the firewall devices. It is changing.
It's not perfect but I am satisfied.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Manufacturing, server room, and office areas of former employer. Switches were great, except in the factory area, because the product is warmer. This was a machine shop with a lot of water-based coolant vapor in the air. This coalesced on cables, etc., and it made things sticky way up toward the ceiling where the switches and Cat 5 cables ran. I suspect that the coolant got into the switch and killed it. We replaced, then did it again.
They did not because in the factory area they kept failing, otherwise they were fine. That was not good enough after three Cisco and three Netgears all failed.
Manageable features, which we heavily used like web GUI and SNMP, except they failed in our environment. Unfortunately, this made them a wash for us. ProCurve switches were what replaced them eventually.
Make them tougher and more ruggedized for warmer and Industrial types of environments, and HumiSeal the main boards and internal components.
Eventually, we gave up using this product. We switched to Netgear ProSafe switches in the factory. We received the same result. What was weird was the web GUIs of both models failed as did SNMP and other features. Only basic plug and play features of switching seemed to work, but you could not ping the switches (managed models were all we used) and all of the management was dead.
What is interesting with Netgear: They allowed me to open our switch after three of theirs failed in the same way. I went through six switches in less than two years in this factory environment. Netgear allowed me to spray HumiSeal into their switch. I disassembled it, sealed the ports off, sprayed and dried the entire main board, then reassembled it. It still failed in the same fashion months later.
Eventually, we replaced it entirely with HPE ProCurve switches. They have never failed and still run to this day.
We use Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for creating networks.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches is a stable solution.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved.
I have been using Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for four years.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches is a scalable solution. Around 60 users are using the solution in our organization.
The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.
Two people are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. I would recommend Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches to other users.
Overall, I rate Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches an eight out of ten.
It is easy to use and stable.
Its scalability can be better. It is not suitable for enterprises. It is for small and medium businesses.
It also needs system improvements. It needs new technology to improve the system.
I have been using this solution for a couple of years.
It is stable.
It is for small and medium businesses. It is not meant for an enterprise. We don't have many customers who use Linksys. I am buying this only for a school.
I haven't used their support.
It is easy to install and pretty straightforward. It generally takes around 30 minutes to install it.
I can install it myself.
It is cheap.
I would not recommend this solution to others. I would rate Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches a six out of ten.
The solution can be used for family or small offices.
The solution is reliable. It has high technology and security. The solution’s network security and management features are among the best in the world, along with Palo Alto.
The product must be made cloud-based.
I have been using the solution for more than ten years.
The tool is stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.
The tool is suitable for enterprises. We have around 80 customers.
The technical support is very good. Cisco provides certifications. All users should have good knowledge of how to deploy Cisco products.
It was easy to install the product.
The tool provides good value for money. It has good functionality, security, technology, and stability. It provides very good service.
The product is reasonably priced. It is flexible. We can pay for it monthly or annually.
Our target customers are small businesses and enterprises. We are selling the tool. My recommendation would depend on the customer. I will recommend the product if someone needs it for their family or has a small office. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
I work with standard Cisco router switches, Email Security Appliance, Web Security Appliance, and this ETD.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches is the first network product I have learned, so it is easy to learn and easy to configure.
I do not work with Cisco XDR, Cisco Duo, or Cisco Secure Access.
The price is somewhat high.
I have been working with Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for four years.
As of now, the product is performing well with no issues for improvement.
Technical support is good. Previously, it was a bit lacking, but now they are providing excellent support.
Positive
I rate Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches a 10.
I have not used the VLAN support feature.
I generally recommend Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches to others.
