Top 10 Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Alternatives

Name: Cisco UCS E-Series Servers
Brand: Cisco
Rating: 4.1 (8 reviews)

Vendor: Cisco

4.1 out of 5

8 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco UCS E-Series Servers based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge R-Series, HPE Synergy, and HPE BladeSystem. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers surpasses its competitors by offering integrated compute, storage, and networking in a compact form factor, ensuring robust performance, scalability, and easy management while reducing total cost of ownership for branch and remote office environments.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dell PowerEdge R-Series

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge R-Series

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge R-Series excels in performance and management, appealing to those prioritizing remote operation ease. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series shines in network integration, making it ideal for network-centric infrastructures seeking seamless connectivity within Cisco's ecosystem.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge R-Series Report

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge R-Series setup cost is higher than Cisco UCS E-Series, but offers greater scalability and customization options. Cisco UCS E-Series provides a cost-effective setup with streamlined integration for small to medium-sized businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE Synergy

4.2 out of 5

HPE Synergy

4.2 out of 5

HPE Synergy excels in composability for flexible resource reuse, appealing to efficiency-focused tech buyers with cost-saving potential. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series provides network reliability and stable integration, attracting those prioritizing manageability and stable network provisioning in their IT infrastructure solutions.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE Synergy Report

Pricing

HPE Synergy has lower setup costs compared to Cisco UCS E-Series Servers, highlighting its cost efficiency for initial deployment. Cisco UCS E-Series, however, is positioned at a higher price point, reflecting a more premium setup investment.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE BladeSystem

4.3 out of 5

HPE BladeSystem

4.3 out of 5

HPE BladeSystem specializes in configurability and integration, ideal for limited space. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series provides advanced disaster recovery, stability, and compatibility with Cisco solutions. HPE offers reliable performance, while Cisco promises high operational savings despite higher costs.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE BladeSystem Report

Pricing

HPE BladeSystem requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco UCS E-Series Servers, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The distinct pricing highlights a notable cost difference between the two server solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series

4.2 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series

4.2 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge MX-Series offers modularity and manageability, excelling in virtualization due to its scalability and high density. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series emphasizes seamless management with strong networking integration, appealing to those seeking reliability and ease of maintenance.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge MX- Series Report

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge MX-Series setup is more expensive, focusing on advanced features, while Cisco UCS E-Series offers a budget-friendly setup with basic functionalities. The price difference highlights distinct target users.

View comparison

Pricing

Supermicro SuperBlade

4.0 out of 5

Supermicro SuperBlade

4.0 out of 5

Supermicro SuperBlade attracts buyers with its energy efficiency and simple deployment, suited for cost-conscious data centers. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series Servers offers robust integration and a wider application range, appealing to those valuing long-term performance and diverse environments over upfront savings.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report

Pricing

Supermicro SuperBlade offers an affordable setup cost, while Cisco UCS E-Series Servers may involve higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant budgetary difference.

View comparison

Pricing

Supermicro SuperBlade offers an affordable setup cost, while Cisco UCS E-Series Servers may involve higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant budgetary difference.

Dell PowerEdge C- Series

4.3 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge C- Series

4.3 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge C-Series is valued for its virtualization and hardware error management capabilities. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series is ideal for network-centric environments with its robust integration and hardware reliability. Dell's competitive pricing contrasts Cisco's perceived high cost but superior network integration.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. Dell PowerEdge C- Series Report

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge C-Series involves moderate setup costs, while Cisco UCS E-Series presents a higher initial setup expense, highlighting a cost-effective difference when choosing between these server options.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE NonStop

4.4 out of 5

HPE NonStop

4.4 out of 5

HPE NonStop focuses on high availability and fault tolerance, ideal for critical applications. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series Servers emphasize advanced virtualization support and scalability, catering to businesses with growing infrastructure needs. HPE ensures stability, while Cisco offers cost-effective, scalable options.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE NonStop Report

Pricing

HPE NonStop incurs higher setup costs than Cisco UCS E-Series Servers, which offer a more affordable entry point.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE NonStop incurs higher setup costs than Cisco UCS E-Series Servers, which offer a more affordable entry point.

Lenovo Flex System

4.2 out of 5

Lenovo Flex System

4.2 out of 5

Lenovo Flex System offers a modular design and scalability, ideal for those seeking flexibility and better support. In comparison, Cisco UCS E-Series provides hybrid cloud capabilities and superior long-term ROI, attracting buyers with intricate needs and a focus on innovation.

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. Lenovo Flex System Report

Pricing

Lenovo Flex System has a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are more budget-friendly for initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Lenovo Flex System has a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are more budget-friendly for initial investment.

Related categories

Blade Servers

Converged Infrastructure

Data Center Networking