3scale API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management comparison

Red Hat and Axway are both solutions in the API Management category. Red Hat is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.0, while Axway is ranked #30. Red Hat holds a 2.0% mindshare in APIM, compared to Axway’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Axway users who would recommend it.

3scale API Management

Read 12 3scale API Management reviews

2,345 Views
2,345 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 14 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

1,721 Views
1,721 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

3scale API Management

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

3scale API Management and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the API management category. While 3scale excels in deployment ease and containerization, Axway holds the advantage in security and governance.

Features: 3scale API Management is noted for its lightweight design, ease of deployment, particularly in containerized environments like OpenShift, and user-friendly API automation and security features. Axway AMPLIFY API Management provides robust security and governance features, excels in handling large data volumes efficiently, and supports extensive cross-system API management.

Room for Improvement: 3scale API Management faces challenges with customization, limited API support, and complexity in managing content through its CMS. The reliance on liquid templates can also be difficult for some developers. Axway AMPLIFY API Management needs improvement in scalability, technical support, and additional features like "Revision History" for API flows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: 3scale API Management offers a seamless deployment experience on various platforms, including on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, but receives mixed reviews for customer service. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is praised for its responsive technical support and supports multiple deployment models, focusing on stability and broader system integration.

Pricing and ROI: 3scale API Management is considered affordable, especially when bundled with OpenShift, offering good value for mid-sized clients. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is perceived as more expensive but justified by its comprehensive features and security capabilities. Both solutions provide a positive ROI, with 3scale appealing to cost-conscious users and Axway to clients needing extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed 3scale API Management vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

3scale API Management vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

3scale API Management

Ranking in API Management

23rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of 3scale API Management is 2.0%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
3scale API Management	2.0%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
Other	96.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2747757

Program Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Facilitates API exposure securely and highlights developer portal flexibility needs

Not much stands out for me regarding the advantages of this product. We usually don't tinker with it. Developing developer portals could be more standards-based. I think currently it's Ruby-based. Having more options on designing that would be beneficial. Additional flexibility would have been great; we would have used it more if it aligned with our platform. I don't use the analytics part. We don't use monetization features, which help to create a revenue generation model.

Read full review

reviewer2081667

Associate Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized gateway has strengthened API security and provides deep traffic analytics

Potential areas of improvement or lack of functions in Axway AMPLIFY API Management is a challenging question because even after working for almost six years, I have not been able to touch everything this tool offers. This tool is very comprehensive and useful. However, from my opinion, when there are different dashboards on which the API platform shows monitoring, I expect Axway AMPLIFY API Management to be more visible in terms of showing pre-historic data. In other words, if there is a very large volume or very large number of transactions going on live in production, sometimes it purges the previous data very quickly, leaving only one or two hours of data. When there is very low volume, it can sustain data up to five days. The visibility of the previous historic database is a feature that could be improved. Different tools can be used to empower this capability, such as Splunk or the ELK stack, which includes Elastic. There are different features that could be used, but Axway as an organization would likely implement their specific products. I am simply providing a very basic opinion anonymously and do not want to sound like I am against this organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It simplifies exposing our APIs externally and inherently adds a layer of security, which I see as a positive impact from the product."

"The solution is quite lightweight, and the installation is very easy. It's like a two-click installation."

"To me, the most valuable feature of 3scale API Management is that it lets you add a backend to the product. I also like that you can integrate it well with OpenShift clusters, making 3scale API Management a useful solution."

"The product is stable."

"3scale API Management's best feature is API management."

"It's good that they aren't adding a lot of features like ESP, etc. It's okay with just being a gateway."

"The gateway is the most valuable feature because it makes it possible for us to gather all traffic into one proxy, which is a good thing."

"The most valuable features are the gateway and security features."

More 3scale API Management pros

"This product is a ten when it comes to API management."

"Axway AMPLIFY API Management is niche technology that people prefer because it has emerged beautifully and has very nice support and enterprise-level features which are not provided by cloud Azure or AWS."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"The most useful features in Axway AMPLIFY API Management, in my opinion, primarily involve the security aspect of the product, which provides us very good methods of securing the network."

"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."

"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

Cons

"It would be helpful to improve the customization features so that the customer can do it based on their own needs."

"The product is not that flexible for developers. It's less flexible and rigid. It's not easy to make changes or customize it."

"We tried to use the portal, but we decided that it wasn't enough. The content management system (CMS) is not easy to use if you want to customize things, and it's hard to get someone who has the knowledge to work with the CMS."

"I believe the CMS part of it has room for improvement though. That is where you write a couple of things if you want to publish your API. It's based on liquid scripting, which doesn't seem like the obvious ones to script with."

"3scale API Management only supports restful APIs and doesn't support SOAP."

"What was suggested by Red Hat was a crucial part of the configuration, but when we started to ask about the supportability of this configuration, Red Hat said only some parts of the configuration would be supported."

"What I'd like to improve in 3scale API Management is its route-limiting feature. Currently, I don't know how to do that effectively on the solution, but in Kong, I know how to do it, so I would love to see route-limiting being easily done on 3scale API Management. It would also be good if there was some authentication that you could do from 3scale API Management because Kong offers that functionality out of the box. What I'd love to see in the next release of 3scale API Management is the ability to integrate more plug-ins easily onto the platform, so you'll be able to extend it, and even do customs management. If Red Hat could offer that extension where it allows the internal organization where 3scale API Management is deployed on-premise to integrate its tools on top of 3scale API Management and provide an API for that, that will make the solution very powerful."

"The user experience could be better. The developer portal is too complex and hard to configure."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

"Team management capabilities could be improved."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is affordable, it's cheap."

"I don't think that 3scale is very expensive."

"The cost was around $45,000 per year."

"3scale API Management has reasonable pricing, judging from its competitor, Kong. My organization pays yearly for the 3scale API Management license, though I'm unable to give the exact figure because every single day there are new clusters deployed. I'm in charge of three to four clusters in my team, but give or take, it costs a few thousand lakhs."

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

12%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for 3scale API Management?

I rate the product’s pricing as two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with 3scale API Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for 3scale API Management?

Our company exposes different APIs, and we use it to monitor traffic, limit traffic, and similar functions. I don't have much involvement with the solution, though I did conduct some research. We s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apigee vs 3scale API Management

Compared 14% of the time

IBM API Connect vs 3scale API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Tyk vs 3scale API Management

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs 3scale API Management

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs 3scale API Management

Compared 7% of the time

More 3scale API Management Competitors

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

February 2026

Download 3scale API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

March 2026

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

Overview

3scale is an API management platform that delivers flexible, highly scalable solutions to package, distribute, control, and monetize your APIs, giving you the power to make the most of your API program.

Share company data, content, or services through Web or mobile applications.
Provide an API to external organizations, internal teams, or both.
Avoid the hassle and constant maintenance of building a solution from scratch.

3scale delivers centralized API management features through a distributed, cloud-hosted layer. The platform includes built-in features to help you build a more successful API program, including access control, rate limits, payment gateway integration, and developer experience tools.

Red Hat

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

Sample Customers

Victor Ops, Coca Cola, The Telegraph, Skava, Orange, Typeform

Engie Group, Allianz

Buyer's Guide

3scale API Management vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

March 2026

Free Report: 3scale API Management vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about 3scale API Management vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our 3scale API Management vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.