A10 Thunder TPS vs Fastly comparison

Read 7 Fastly reviews

694 Views
435 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

A10 Thunder TPS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

A10 Thunder TPS and Fastly are leading solutions in network security and content delivery. A10 Thunder TPS is advantageous with its attractive pricing and strong support, while Fastly gains the upper hand through superior feature offerings justifying its higher cost.

Features: A10 Thunder TPS provides comprehensive DDoS protection, offering efficient attack mitigation and reliable firewall capabilities. It excels in automated defense with RESTful API, supporting multi-vector attack protection. Fastly is recognized for its advanced caching and load balancing features, expediting content delivery worldwide. Its version control for configurations allows rapid deployment and rollback. Its powerful VCL scripting enables extensive customization for precise control over content delivery.

Room for Improvement: A10 Thunder TPS could enhance its feature set with better integration for SIP and proxy functionalities, increase form factor efficiency, and expand global support coverage. Fastly may benefit from clarifying its zero-trust capabilities, improving user experience in its API, and expanding its performance in hybrid environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: A10 Thunder TPS offers a simple deployment process with a focus on security and dependable customer service, ensuring an easy start for security-centric operations. Fastly, though more complex, provides extensive customization options that cater to organizations valuing tailored performance optimizations, necessitating a more involved setup process yet supported by robust technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: A10 Thunder TPS stands out with competitive pricing and a great ROI for organizations focusing on security investments. Its cost-effectiveness is particularly beneficial for setups prioritizing security. Fastly involves a potentially higher initial investment but offers significant ROI by aligning performance enhancements with business goals centered around speed and reliability, appealing especially to performance-focused markets.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Thunder TPS vs. Fastly Report (Updated: June 2025).

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Fastly

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

A10 Thunder TPS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Fastly

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (7th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of A10 Thunder TPS is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fastly is 2.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

RonaldoDE Melo

Sales Account Executive at L8 Group

Useful for protecting and supporting users against attacks

One problem for me with A10 Thunder TPS is that the box comes from another country in Brazil. In the tool, there is no one key to block it. For example, in F5 Networks, we have a key. If you try to buy another box from Huawei or from F5 and try to enable them in A10 Thunder TPS, you need a key to do it. The problem here is when you buy another box from A10, they want to put Thunder TPS to run, and it works okay, after which we cannot block it for another solution to be used, which is a problem for me where improvements are needed.

Read full review

Nick Wilsdon

CEO at Torque

An easily scalable and stable product that provides exceptional support

The product should provide improved bot detection and management. The product should also provide support for code management. Everybody working in CDN is currently looking for ways to better manage code deployment with various authorization levels and synchronization with our lower environments. Matching up what's happening in CDN with what's happening on the origin regarding testing would always be useful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can keep track of all the customer's requirements. We can forecast our trails and we can forecast our overall financial things."

"I had a rather positive experience with A10 Networks Support Service."

"The GUI is very use-friendly. You can configure it through CLI or GUI, they give you an option to choose. It's a good solution in terms of the appliance itself. It's very light compared to other brands that offer DDoS solutions."

"The solution is easy to use and implement in terms of operations."

"The solution's support is one of the coolest things about the product. I"

"The response time to an attack is instant. We've used some outsourced solutions in the past, out in the cloud, that weren't so quick. But it's all within our control now. We control how fast it mitigates."

"The most valuable feature of A10 Thunder TPS is load balancing."

"The product's initial setup phase is very simple."

More A10 Thunder TPS pros

"Rate limiting is a good feature that protects from volumetric attacks."

"Its initial setup process is straightforward."

"Support is good; the product works as advertised. We have a Slack connection with them. So we can basically ask for help, live, engage, and ring when they respond. Very quickly."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"Fastly uses configuration versioning, where you can deploy a new version in less than one minute."

"The product helps our organization to access sites located in different regions quickly."

"Compute@Edge features are valuable to me."

Cons

"It is very difficult to implement. It should be made a bit easier to implement. There is also a lack of resources on the internet. They need to develop more resources."

"We have had some issues with implementation. So, it is the only area that needs improvement."

"Its documentation could be better."

"They have a cloud scrubbing feature that redirects the traffic if the on-prem appliance can't accommodate a large amount of traffic but it's not available where we are."

"The upgrade process for the boxes is not efficient. We have to go through the A10 aGalaxy where we have issues, like timeouts. They told me it was fixed in the latest version, but I tried to do it on the Portal and it is not working all the time."

"The solution is a little expensive."

"The solution needs improvement in terms of fail-open."

"We currently do not use the solution's machine-learning-powered Zero-day Automated Protection because of an issue with it... We also use the aGalaxy platform, which is a management platform for the TPS devices. The issue is that some TPS features were added at the TPS level but weren't carried over to aGalaxy, and we manage all of our devices through aGalaxy. So we can't actually use some of the new features that are available on the TPS because that functionality doesn't exist in aGalaxy. That is one of my biggest complaints."

More A10 Thunder TPS cons

"Fastly's customer service area needs improvement."

"Support is not that great."

"What I don't like about Fastly is that they charge a heavy price."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"It is missing a "staging" platform to deploy a test configuration with all of the real settings, which would allow us to properly test before putting it into production."

"The product should provide improved bot detection and management."

"Stronger analytics would be helpful, like showing configurations that haven't served a certain amount of traffic in a while. With many properties, things can get lost track of - duplicates or unused configurations not properly decommissioned."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The financials are always a challenge with this type of technology. That's not really a product-functionality thing but it's the area where we push A10 the most."

"We may need to pay fifty percent more if we purchase other solutions. For the payments made to A10 Thunder TPS, we have received three-year support."

"Pricing is very reasonable."

"We did a price survey, and compared to other solutions, A10 Thunder TPS wasn't cheap."

"We had a customer who was down for six hours and the loss of revenue for him was three times the price he was paying for us per year. The customer just said, "I don't care about paying you because on only one attack I saved money. It's three times better than losing money.""

"Pricing was much higher with Arbor (APS) for the same type of solution."

"The tool is expensive. If one is low price and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as a ten."

"Fastly is less expensive than one of its competitors."

"The solution is cheaper than other products in the market."

"I've generally found Fastly to be very competitive in pricing, especially around Compute@Edge."

"It is an expensive solution."

"In my opinion, Fastly is priced competitively."

"You need to pay a premium price for the tool."

"The pricing has been very competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

33%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about A10 Thunder TPS?

The most valuable feature of A10 Thunder TPS is load balancing.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for A10 Thunder TPS?

I have not seen specific prices, like $10,000 or $20,000. A frustrating aspect is the lack of demo versions. The vendor insists on commercial licenses despite requests for demo licenses. The global...

What needs improvement with A10 Thunder TPS?

I had issues with the user interface because, when putting settings up, the system asked me for strange things like virtual local networks that I didn't create. For example, I set an NTP server, an...

What do you like most about Fastly?

Support is good; the product works as advertised. We have a Slack connection with them. So we can basically ask for help, live, engage, and ring when they respond. Very quickly.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fastly?

You need to pay a premium price for the tool.

What needs improvement with Fastly?

What I don't like about Fastly is that they charge a heavy price. The pricing is different per region. If you have a customer who is international and has deployments in different regions, it is ve...

Arbor DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Comparisons

Compared 51% of the time

Radware DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 13% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 7% of the time

More A10 Thunder TPS Competitors

Akamai vs Fastly

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudflare vs Fastly

Compared 19% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Fastly

Compared 8% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Fastly

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Fastly

Compared 6% of the time

More Fastly Competitors

Product Reports

A10 Thunder TPS

Download A10 Thunder TPS product report

Download Fastly product report

Overview

The Thunder TPS is a family of high-performance DDoS defense solutions that detect and mitigate multi-vector DDoS attacks. Unlike traditional DDoS defenses that leave a wake of collateral damage against users, Thunder TPS applies a source-based defense-in-depth mitigation pipeline. This multimodal defense that includes actionable DDoS weapons intelligence, operator definable adaptive policies, and machine learning-powered Zero-Day Automated Protection (ZAP) blocks attackers while protecting real users.

The Thunder TPS is uniquely suited for communication service providers, online gaming, and enterprise network operators who protect large networks and need compact solutions with faster response from a fully automated, zero-touch defense during an attack.

A10 Networks

Fastly helps the world’s most popular digital businesses keep pace with their customer expectations by delivering fast, secure, and scalable online experiences. Businesses trust Fastly’s edge cloud platform to accelerate the pace of technical innovation, mitigate evolving threats, and scale on demand.

Sample Customers

DDoS defense solution trusted for more than 200 service providers, online gaming, and enterprises including; Bungie, Comcast, KDDI Corporation, Leaseweb, Microsoft Azure, NTT Docomo, Softbank, Turkcell Superonline, Verizon and more.

Twitter, Airbnb, Alaska Airlines, Pinterest, Vimeo, The Guardian, The New York Times, Ticketmaster, The Drupal Association, Opera, about.com, imgur, Etsy, Foursquare, GitHub, New Relic, shopify, Shazam, Firebase

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Fastly