ACCELQ Automate vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local."

"It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE."

"One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library."

"The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application."

"It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry."

"One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly."

"The solution helps to accelerate software testing automation. It will help to reduce lead time and increase productivity and efficiency."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"The pricing could be improved."

"We push one button and the tests are completely executed at once, so just have to analyze and say it's okay. It would be nice if this could be entirely automated."

"It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support."

"Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise."

"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

"Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls. I faced challenges with schedulers and calendars."

"The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added."

"The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."