Actian Ingres vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Actian and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. Actian is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6. Actian holds a 2.3% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Actian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Actian Ingres

Read 2 Actian Ingres reviews

1,091 Views
436 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 85 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

4,732 Views
1,467 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Actian Ingres

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Actian Ingres are competing products in the data management category. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions seems to hold the upper hand due to its strong pricing and support, while Actian Ingres is noted for its advanced features.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers comprehensive integration with cloud environments, along with modern data service capabilities and efficient resource management. Actian Ingres is known for its robust scalability, performance optimization, and efficient handling of data-intensive applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides flexible deployment options and strong customer support, making implementation seamless. Actian Ingres features a straightforward deployment model but faces initial support challenges, indicating potential areas for improvement in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions involves a higher initial setup cost but promises long-term ROI due to its cloud efficiencies. Actian Ingres offers more cost-effective initial pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, though it may require additional investment for performance tuning to achieve maximum ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actian Ingres

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

25th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

12th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (5th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Actian Ingres is 2.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 4.0%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	4.0%
Actian Ingres	2.3%
Other	93.7%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

GustavHoltzhausen

Sr Sales Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Reliable performance enhances operations with good technical support

We run the entire IRS system, the income system, and the tax system. We also manage the entire Absa banking system in Africa. There's a lot of database applications, similar to those used in banks and the IRS The most valuable features for us are reliability and performance. Our system is used…

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The deployment of our solution across a number of servers using Ingres .NET has meant that we can protect the database server behind a highly secure firewall and deploy the front end solutions on a normal web server."

"The most valuable features for us are reliability and performance."

"RabbitMQ is good in its real-time capability of delivering the sensor data in different topic abstractions."

"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."

"The reports are running very fast, a matter of minutes instead of hours as it was previously."

"The feature I find most valuable in VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is in terms of management."

"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"

"Pivotal Greenplum's shared-nothing architecture."

"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."

"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."

Cons

"The ability to reset the log file without stopping the DBMS would be helpful for us."

"The seamless integration is a bit of an issue."

"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."

"It doesn't work as efficiently as we'd like because it requires more segment node capacity (size, RAM, CPU) than we currently have."

"We had deployment issues after installing new patches."

"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."

"Maintenance is time-consuming."

"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."

"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."

"Have more features such as being able to replay a sequence of what was received."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is okay."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"It is an open-source product."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"This is an open source solution."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Actian Ingres?

The seamless integration is a bit of an issue. I would like to see more direct connectors and stuff like SQLAlchemy. It's there but isn't available as a standard, so it involves going to GitHub to ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Actian Ingres?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Actian Ingres?

Initially, it's a lot less expensive than competitors. Price performance has always been a priority, ensuring we remain competitive in the market.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Actian Ingres

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Informix vs Actian Ingres

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Database Appliance vs Actian Ingres

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs Actian Ingres

Compared 5% of the time

SAP IQ vs Actian Ingres

Compared 5% of the time

More Actian Ingres Competitors

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Warehouse

February 2026

Download Actian Ingres product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

February 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Ingres, Ingres 2006

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Actian’s Ingres is a leading, enterprise-grade database management system designed to reduce IT costs and time-to-value, while delivering the strength and features expected from an enterprise-class database. Ingres 10.2 is the latest version of the database, containing enhancements that will make it easier to internationalize customer applications. Along with improved performance and reduced configuration overhead, users can take their first steps into big data analytics with the new Window functions.

Actian

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Groupe Adeo, IsCool Entertainment

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

March 2026

Free Report: Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors and best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.