


AppWorx Workload Automation and ActiveBatch by Redwood are both strong players in workload automation, each addressing unique operational needs. Based on user feedback, ActiveBatch appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive library of pre-built job steps and strong integration capabilities.
Features: AppWorx Workload Automation offers simplicity, reliability, and ease of integration across diverse environments. It supports complex job streams with AI enhancements and has strong error-handling and workload management features. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides a vast library of pre-built job steps for seamless integration, excels in scheduling and monitoring, and offers a "single pane of glass" view for workflows, enhancing operational efficiency and customization.
Room for Improvement: AppWorx could improve its mainframe support and simplify its licensing model. Users also desire better integration with modern tools. ActiveBatch users mention a steep learning curve, wishing for a more intuitive interface and enhanced AI integration, cloud support, and documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppWorx supports diverse environments, including on-premises and hybrid clouds, but some users find its third-party customer support less satisfactory. ActiveBatch offers on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options, with generally positive feedback on its responsive customer service, though suggestions include better self-help resources.
Pricing and ROI: AppWorx receives mixed reviews on pricing due to unexpected costs, yet remains cost-effective for many users. ActiveBatch is praised for its cost-effectiveness and feature breadth, though recent pricing model changes have sparked discussions. Many users find the investment justified by its strong performance and support, making it competitive in workload automation.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
The cost has definitely gone up tremendously.
It saved IT time by 50%.
We require fewer team members to handle operations due to its robust automation.
The product manages workloads efficiently, allowing our operators to learn and operate it quickly, which underscores its value to our business.
It has significantly reduced the time required for tasks that were previously manual, such as running batch and online jobs and report submissions.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
We often need to escalate issues to level two or three for solutions related to long-standing problems.
Their current support level is really good.
Technical support is managed by third parties now, which complicates direct customer assistance from Broadcom.
Those are situations where it has helped us to just say that we don't really care in which tech stack that we are in, whether it's latest or not, but the forward as well as the backward compatibility has been of great help.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
ActiveBatch by Redwood's scalability is excellent; it experiences minimal failures and outages.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
When the servers are under high load, it can take more than one day sometimes.
We have not faced any real issues, and it’s the main reason why we haven't enabled a lot of the redundancy features.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
On the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs.
I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized.
AppWorx Workload Automation does not support mainframe environments.
Licensing fees have increased as they charge based on executions rather than user agents, causing higher costs.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
My thoughts on the pricing of JAMS are that I won't say it is cheap, but it is cost-efficient, and that should be acceptable.
The pricing and licensing were fair.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great
Licensing now depends on execution counts as opposed to agent counts, leading to increased costs.
The licensing is fair and reasonable for what the product offers.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
JAMS helps centralize the management of jobs on all of my platforms and applications, which has helped my organization significantly.
By using JAMS, we have gained a lot more efficiencies in terms of all of those to streamline it, and there is no necessary need for having an overnight engineer just keeping an eye on all of this.
The addition of AI has made troubleshooting and supporting users through ActiveBatch by Redwood quicker for me.
The best feature that ActiveBatch by Redwood offers is the user interface.
AppWorx Workload Automation's simplicity and powerful functionality are its most valuable features for us.
Atomic Applications Manager is user-friendly and accommodates around 100 users who can monitor and run their jobs effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 3.0% |
| AppWorx Workload Automation | 2.3% |
| ActiveBatch by Redwood | 3.1% |
| Other | 91.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?
What benefits should users look for in JAMS reviews?
In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.
ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.
What important features does ActiveBatch offer?In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.
AppWorx Workload Automation streamlines process automation across Windows, AWS, and Azure platforms. It offers dynamic task handling and efficient scheduling, accommodating various applications and teams with high availability.
AppWorx Workload Automation is an object-based workload automation tool that optimizes job scheduling for complex processes. Users benefit from its robust functionality and seamless process automation, even in cloud environments. Despite its outdated interface, lack of mainframe support, and complex internal security model, it effectively supports electronic automations in retail and higher education. Integration challenges with Active Directory and third-party license negotiations may affect its usability. Users seek improvements in scalability, API features, and artificial intelligence enhancements. Timeout issues and a complex setup process are other concerns.
What are the key features of AppWorx Workload Automation?In retail and higher education, AppWorx Workload Automation excels in scheduling applications, batch processing, and automating roles like password and fund management. It plays a crucial role in monitoring revenue-based jobs and managing unique servers within cloud infrastructures.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.