ActiveBatch by Redwood vs CloudDat comparison

Why PeerSpot?

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Data Expedition are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Data Expedition is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 2.9% mindshare in MFT, compared to Data Expedition’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Data Expedition users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 41 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

6,099 Views
1,952 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudDat

Read 2 CloudDat reviews

534 Views
534 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

CloudDat

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ActiveBatch by Redwood and CloudDat based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).

To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (13th), Workload Automation (9th)

CloudDat

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 2.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudDat is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ActiveBatch by Redwood	2.9%
CloudDat	1.0%
Other	96.1%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Sai

Ai/Data Analyst at CSD

Automation has streamlined complex data workflows and now saves time on recurring reporting

To improve ActiveBatch by Redwood, the UI could be more modern and intuitive, and another thing that comes to mind is that it can feel overwhelming when workflows become large and complex. Troubleshooting can take extra time when there are multiple dependencies, jobs, and integrations running together. Better visualization of workflow relationships and easier debugging would really help. I would also appreciate seeing more simplified onboarding and documentation for newer users, as there is a learning curve at the beginning. Another improvement area could be smarter analytics or AI-driven recommendations, such as proactively identifying workflow bottlenecks, failed job patterns, or optimization suggestions instead of relying mostly on manual monitoring. From an operational perspective, faster configuration for integrations and cloud-based workflows would make implementation smoother, especially in environments working heavily with APIs and data pipelines. I have covered the main points regarding needed improvements. Overall, the platform is very capable and reliable for automation and workflow scheduling, especially in data-heavy environments. Most of the improvements I want are around making it easier for day-to-day use, such as a more intuitive UI, simpler troubleshooting for complex workflows, better onboarding for newer users, and more intelligent monitoring or optimization insights. The core functionality is strong, and the biggest opportunity is improving the overall user experience and simplifying operational management.

Read full review

Tarandeep Kaur

Devops Manager at Flash

Hourly orchestration has cut idle compute waste and gives our AI teams rapid on‑demand training

CloudDat is a great solution and has given us a great return. One thing as a suggestion is that while tracking the hourly usage is very precise, the dashboard threshold alert can sometimes experience a lag of ten to fifteen minutes. This occasionally makes the proactive cut-off automation tighter than ideal. For example, if I am opting for a two-hour auto cut-off, sometimes it is detecting that it is there, and there is a fifteen-minute lag. The cut-off is basically either fifteen minutes before or fifteen minutes after. There is a chance of a mismatch in the billing due to this, which can be improved. The rest is fine. The billing issue which I highlighted is something very critical sometimes. When we are a regular customer and we are working with CloudDat, sometimes it is very disappointing to see that there is a lag in the subscription. This is why I have given it a four.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As far as centralization goes it's nice because we can see all these processes that are tied to this larger process. The commissions, FTP processing, the reporting, the file moves to the business users — all that is right there. It's very easy to read. It's easy to tie it together, visually, and see where each of these steps fits into the bigger picture."

"ActiveBatch helped us automate and schedule routine tasks such as data backups, file transfers, database updates, and report generation, which frees IT staff to focus on other studies."

"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."

"Automating the scheduled data workflows and integrations helped improve analyst productivity by around 25 to 30%, mainly because less time was spent manually triggering jobs or fixing missed dependencies."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

"The central automation hub for scheduling and monitoring brings everything together under a single pane of glass by streamlining everything: It takes less time to run everything, it's less expensive because we no longer have the extra operator running jobs, there is less chance of an operator clicking the wrong button because we run both a test system and production system side by side, and it automatically will send an output where it needs to go in real-time."

"We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform regular, repetitive tasks in a more reliable way."

"It has improved our workflow completion rates by five hours per day, because we execute our workflows daily."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"Time-saving is one of the most crucial and one of the best features over here in CloudDat."

"CloudDat has reduced our infrastructure spend by seventy-two percent as compared to our previous baseline reserved instance approach."

Cons

"One way ActiveBatch by Redwood can be improved is through a more intuitive user interface for new users."

"It does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex. You have to learn how it does things. I don't know if it's any worse than any other tool would be, just because of the nature of what it does... the learning curve is the hardest part."

"A nice thing to have would be the ability to comfortably pass variables from one job to another. That was one of the things that I found difficult."

"The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application."

"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."

"The only thing is that it does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex."

"Setting up the software was hard."

"I have faced struggles to understand, set up the tool, and implement it in my early days as a new user."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"Improvement-wise for CloudDat, I think some days there is some latency."

"The billing issue which I highlighted is something very critical sometimes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	52

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I was not directly involved in the pricing, setup cost, and licensing decisions for ActiveBatch by Redwood, so my experience is from the user and workflow side rather than procurement. However, bas...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved with a more modern and intuitive user interface, faster performance for very large workflows, and expanded built-in integrations with newer cloud and DevOps...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My main use case for ActiveBatch by Redwood is enterprise workload automation, job scheduling, and orchestrating business processes across applications, servers, and cloud environments. For example...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudDat?

Improvement-wise for CloudDat, I think some days there is some latency. The scaling must be fast enough, but sometimes it avoids delays. That is one challenge we had. Sometimes the server might be ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudDat?

My main use case for CloudDat is storing, processing, and analyzing data. At my project and company, we use platforms like AWS instead of some servers. This really helps when data is handled in rea...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudDat?

I can share specific outcomes related to time saved with CloudDat. You don't need to always access it each time. If a user can have multiple access to a particular cloud, then he can run in multipl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

VisualCron vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 4% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs CloudDat

Compared 40% of the time

Aspera On Demand vs CloudDat

Compared 36% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs CloudDat

Compared 7% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs CloudDat

Compared 6% of the time

More CloudDat Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

October 2026

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2026

Download CloudDat product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

CloudDat revolutionizes data management by providing a comprehensive platform tailored for efficient data storage, processing, and analytics. Its robust capabilities support a range of industry needs, ensuring smooth integration with existing infrastructure.

CloudDat stands out as an essential technology for businesses seeking to enhance their data-driven strategies. It offers scalable solutions for data management, enabling seamless interactions and advanced analytics. Its architecture supports extensive data processing while maintaining security and compliance. CloudDat plays a crucial role in helping companies stay competitive by offering tools that improve decision-making and streamline operations.

What features make CloudDat stand out?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing data volumes without impacting performance.
Security: Implements strong data protection measures to ensure privacy and compliance.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with existing systems, facilitating data transfer and utility.
Analytics: Offers advanced tools for generating insightful real-time analytics.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from CloudDat?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by optimizing resource usage.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides deep data insights supporting strategic choices.
Time Savings: Streamlines processes leading to faster data handling and results.
Flexibility: Adapts to specific business needs improving agility and response times.

In finance, CloudDat facilitates real-time transaction analysis and risk management, while in healthcare, it supports patient data processing and medical research. The retail sector uses CloudDat for inventory management and customer insights, demonstrating its versatility across fields.

Data Expedition

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

castLabs

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.