Acunetix vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Invicti is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while Rapid7 is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.4. Invicti holds a 1.1% mindshare in VM, compared to Rapid7’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 38 Acunetix reviews

6,442 Views
1,546 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Rapid7 Metasploit

Read 22 Rapid7 Metasploit reviews

3,307 Views
2,811 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Rapid7 Metasploit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Acunetix and Rapid7 Metasploit are competitive tools in the vulnerability assessment market. Acunetix has the edge with deep scanning capabilities and advanced reporting, whereas Rapid7 Metasploit shines with its extensive exploit library.

Features: Acunetix includes features like interactive application security testing, automatic report generation, and false positive minimization. It excels with comprehensive scan reports and deep vulnerability assessments. Rapid7 Metasploit offers a robust exploit library and integrates with InsightVM for seamless vulnerability validation. It provides automation scripting and is equipped with various penetration testing modules.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix users suggest enhancements in its IAS tool and reducing false positives. Expanding the database and integrating PCI compliance features are desired. Rapid7 Metasploit could benefit from faster exploit updates and a more user-friendly GUI. Users also recommend improved integration with other vulnerability scanners and better automation capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix provides on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud deployment, with responsive 24/7 technical support. It integrates easily with other platforms. Rapid7 Metasploit offers average technical support with one-day response times, and its support accessibility could be improved.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has experienced rising costs, challenging its value proposition. Its efficiency gains often reflect good ROI, but recent price hikes have raised concerns. Rapid7 Metasploit is competitively priced with free and paid versions, offering an affordable entry point and positive ROI perceptions.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.9

Acunetix improves efficiency and security by automating vulnerability detection, reducing costs and manual testing efforts for businesses.

Sentiment score

4.3

Rapid7 Metasploit efficiently identifies vulnerabilities and saves costs but is average for experienced users or those using Qualys/Nessus.

It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.

Abdullah Ozkan

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

I have seen a return on investment with Acunetix, including time saved and cost reduction, because it provides us threats on our web application servers.

Mohamed Fouad

cybersecurity Team Leader at EMAK

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Metasploit has helped save time, especially with testing websites or VIPD projects.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

The ROI can be very rapid for organizations using vulnerability assessment for the first time.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.4

Acunetix's customer service is praised for responsiveness, yet users experience varying response times and suggest improvements.

Sentiment score

5.9

Rapid7 Metasploit support has mixed reviews, with helpful resources but varying response times and effectiveness compared to Cisco.

For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.

Abdullah Ozkan

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

Support staff not being familiar with the problem.

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Rapid7 sometimes struggles with queries from non-security people, whereas Tenable is more patient.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

The customer support is excellent

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.9

Acunetix efficiently manages growing workloads with adaptable deployment despite scan speed and Linux support challenges, with user satisfaction.

Sentiment score

5.1

Rapid7 Metasploit's scalability opinions vary, some see limitations, others appreciate flexibility; performance varies by project and infrastructure.

Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Acunetix's scalability for my growing needs is great; it is a very scalable product compared to others.

Mohamed Fouad

cybersecurity Team Leader at EMAK

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Metasploit can handle big projects and is already prepared for them.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

Rapid7 Metasploit is highly scalable.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Rapid7 Metasploit has limited scalability based on my experience, as the customer receives the full functionality of the product with the license.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.1

Acunetix is stable and reliable, with minimal issues and helpful support, offering consistent performance and reporting capabilities.

Sentiment score

7.8

Rapid7 Metasploit's stability is highly praised, with recent versions improving and rated 8-9/10, despite occasional network issues.

I did not need to reach customer support because the product is very stable.

Mohamed Fouad

cybersecurity Team Leader at EMAK

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

I have never faced any technical issues or downtimes.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

I find Metasploit to be very stable, and I would rate its stability as a nine out of ten.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Room For Improvement

Acunetix needs improved scanning speed, reduced false positives, better reporting, enhanced support, flexible licensing, and improved mobile integration.

Rapid7 Metasploit needs faster updates, improved tools integration, better UI, enhanced features, and updated evasion capabilities for modern defenses.

The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution.

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

The time taken to fetch reports based on the number of events can be extensive.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Setup Cost

Acunetix pricing is viewed as costly, with calls for more flexible and transparent pricing to match market standards.

Rapid7 Metasploit's pricing ranges from free to $20,000, with varied opinions on its affordability compared to competitors.

The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.

Abdullah Ozkan

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.

Srinivas Walikar

Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

The cost is approximately $15 per device.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Metasploit is cheaper than Nessus and offers a more robust community edition that provides a good experience for studying Metasploit.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

After that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep integration with InsightVM.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Valuable Features

Acunetix excels in vulnerability detection, offers comprehensive reports, scalability, and ease of use for enhanced application security.

Rapid7 Metasploit excels in penetration testing with strong integration, comprehensive features, and efficient management in a unified platform.

Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.

Srinivas Walikar

Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World

The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

InsightVM searches for potential threats and vulnerabilities of the infrastructure, and after that, Rapid7 Metasploit validates whether we can break the system using this vulnerability or threat, serving as a validator component of the InsightVM solution.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

The most valuable features of Metasploit include its powerful capabilities for exploitation and scanning.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), DevSecOps (6th)

Rapid7 Metasploit

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Acunetix	1.1%
Rapid7 Metasploit	1.5%
Other	97.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Extensive exploit database and seamless integration enhance penetration testing capabilities

The automated approach in the audits or in the hacking testing with Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved because even the same attack you provide today will go in different ways another day. I prefer when the auditor or pen-tester provides the attack in a non-automated mode. For some, it might be a valuable option, but I'm not sure it's valuable for us, as after the attack has been provided, we should release a report detailing how it transpired and what the customer should improve to block this way of attack. If the attack was provided in an automated mode, you cannot receive sufficient information that helps with this final report for the customer. While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system. Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved in areas concerning the experience with finding particular scripts pre-installed in the solution. Customers, administrators, and pen-testers spend considerable time trying to locate the specific component they need by the name of the technique or the name of the attack, so any improvements in making it easier to find those predefined components by name or timeframe would be beneficial. Search filters could be a correct improvement.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I'm using Acunetix to automate security checks. Acunetix helped me catch common vulnerability issues early and improved the overall security posture of the application before development, specifica...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I would advise anyone or any startup looking to engage in the security part to directly use Acunetix, as this will help in most aspects. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

The pricing of Rapid7 Metasploit is quite affordable. It has a free version that many customers start with, and after that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 14% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Acunetix

Compared 3% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

February 2026

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

January 2026

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Metasploit

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

February 2026

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.