Top 10 Rapid7 Metasploit Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

22 reviews
95% willing to recommend

Top Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Rapid7 Metasploit based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Qualys VMDR, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, and Tenable Nessus. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Rapid7 Metasploit surpasses its competitors by offering a comprehensive suite of penetration testing tools, advanced automation capabilities, and a robust database of exploits, empowering security professionals to efficiently uncover and remediate vulnerabilities in complex networks.

Rapid7 Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Rapid7, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Qualys VMDR

4.1 out of 5

Qualys VMDR

4.1 out of 5

Qualys VMDR offers comprehensive vulnerability management with advanced scanning and policy compliance features. In comparison, Rapid7 Metasploit excels in penetration testing with a robust exploit library. Qualys suits enterprises needing extensive monitoring, while Rapid7 appeals to those focused on active threat simulations.

Download Qualys VMDR vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report

Pricing

Qualys VMDR involves a higher setup cost, whereas Rapid7 Metasploit tends to offer a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference between these cybersecurity solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Qualys VMDR involves a higher setup cost, whereas Rapid7 Metasploit tends to offer a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference between these cybersecurity solutions.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

4.4 out of 5

Rapid7 Metasploit offers efficient penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, appealing to security teams with its cost-effectiveness. In comparison, SentinelOne delivers AI-driven endpoint protection and real-time threat detection, catering to organizations seeking extensive features and improved ROI despite higher setup costs.

Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit has a lower setup cost compared to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, which may appeal to budget-conscious users seeking cost efficiency. In contrast, SentinelOne offers more robust initial features justifying its higher setup price.

View comparison

Pricing

Tenable Nessus

4.2 out of 5

Tenable Nessus

4.2 out of 5

Rapid7 Metasploit offers unmatched penetration testing capabilities with a vast exploit database, ideal for security testing. In comparison, Tenable Nessus excels in vulnerability assessment with ease of use and detailed reporting, making it suitable for efficient vulnerability management.

Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Nessus Report

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup cost, while Tenable Nessus provides a variable setup cost depending on features and package chosen.

View comparison

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit offers a straightforward setup cost, while Tenable Nessus provides a variable setup cost depending on features and package chosen.

Tenable Security Center

4.1 out of 5

Tenable Security Center

4.1 out of 5

Tenable Security Center excels in vulnerability scanning and asset management leveraging Nessus, ideal for detailed dashboards. In comparison, Rapid7 Metasploit focuses on penetration testing, offering automation and cross-platform support. Each suits distinct security needs, influencing tech buyers based on priorities and infrastructure.

Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Security Center Report

Pricing

Tenable Security Center setup costs are higher with a more comprehensive initial investment, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Tenable Security Center setup costs are higher with a more comprehensive initial investment, while Rapid7 Metasploit offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront costs.

Tenable Vulnerability Management

4.0 out of 5

Tenable Vulnerability Management

4.0 out of 5

Rapid7 Metasploit attracts tech buyers with its flexible penetration testing and affordable pricing. In comparison, Tenable Vulnerability Management appeals to those seeking comprehensive risk assessment and advanced analytics, despite higher costs, due to its streamlined deployment and long-term security benefits.

Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit often incurs higher setup costs, while Tenable Vulnerability Management offers more budget-friendly options. This pricing distinction highlights the difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Acunetix

3.9 out of 5

Acunetix

3.9 out of 5

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Download Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report

Pricing

Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.

The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.

View comparison

Pricing

Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.

The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

4.3 out of 5

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

4.3 out of 5

Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for focused penetration testing with advanced tools and lower setup costs. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP suits those needing comprehensive cloud security with cloud-native deployment and real-time threat intelligence, justified by higher investment for broader protection.

Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit features a moderate setup cost, contrasting with Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP, which entails a more significant initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit features a moderate setup cost, contrasting with Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP, which entails a more significant initial investment.

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

4.0 out of 5

Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for environments needing advanced penetration testing and exploit development with significant ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers real-time threat intelligence and seamless integration, benefiting those seeking comprehensive security within Microsoft ecosystems, emphasizing integration and seamless real-time capabilities over hands-on testing.

Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

Amazon Inspector

4.1 out of 5

Amazon Inspector

4.1 out of 5

Rapid7 Metasploit targets on-premise penetration testing with extensive exploit libraries, suitable for complex testing needs. In comparison, Amazon Inspector focuses on cloud environments, integrating seamlessly with AWS for scalable security assessments, and offers a cost-effective pricing model aligned with cloud usage, benefiting tech buyers prioritizing AWS integration.

Download Amazon Inspector vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit shows cost-effectiveness in setup expenses, contrasting with Amazon Inspector's higher initial setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit shows cost-effectiveness in setup expenses, contrasting with Amazon Inspector's higher initial setup costs.

The NodeZero Platform

2.5 out of 5

The NodeZero Platform

2.5 out of 5

Rapid7 Metasploit offers ease of integration and an extensive exploit database, ideal for manual testing preferences. In comparison, NodeZero Platform emphasizes automation with AI-driven scanning, appealing to those seeking real-time detection. Metasploit's long-term value contrasts with NodeZero's cost-efficient subscription model.

Download Rapid7 Metasploit vs. The NodeZero Platform Report

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit's setup cost is higher, while The NodeZero Platform offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Rapid7 Metasploit's setup cost is higher, while The NodeZero Platform offers a more budget-friendly option.