Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Fortra and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Fortra is ranked #59, while Rapid7 is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.3. Fortra holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Rapid7’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Rapid7 Metasploit are competitors in the cybersecurity landscape, focusing on vulnerability management. Rapid7 Metasploit appears to maintain an edge in feature innovation due to its advanced penetration testing tools, whereas Fortra Tripwire IP360 is preferred for its comprehensive asset scanning and threat intelligence integration.

Features: Fortra Tripwire IP360 provides robust asset discovery, vulnerability prioritization, and threat intelligence integration across networks. Rapid7 Metasploit offers advanced penetration testing tools, extensive exploit libraries, and custom scripting capabilities that enhance adaptability.

Room for Improvement: Fortra Tripwire IP360 could improve in setup simplification, user interface intuitiveness, and integration ease with third-party security tools. Rapid7 Metasploit may benefit from expanding its threat intelligence insights, enhancing asset discovery features, and refining reporting capabilities for clearer visibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 Metasploit is known for straightforward setup and strong community support, providing resources for troubleshooting and optimization. Fortra Tripwire IP360 comes with a steeper learning curve but has dedicated customer service for guided deployment and maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra Tripwire IP360's premium pricing reflects its in-depth vulnerability analysis capabilities with a high ROI through risk reduction. Rapid7 Metasploit offers competitive pricing with flexible subscription models, balancing cost and actionable security insights, appealing to cost-conscious clients seeking immediate value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Qualys TotalCloud is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortra Tripwire IP360 is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys TotalCloud	1.0%
Rapid7 Metasploit	2.1%
Fortra Tripwire IP360	0.7%
Other	96.2%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Robert Orłowski

IT Security Expert at Alior Bank S.A.

Unified risk scoring has improved our cloud visibility and simplifies remediation priorities

Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IAS and SaaS. This solution provides a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce the work I would have to do. We are no longer based on CVSS; we are based on Qualys risk scoring, which is based on CVSS plus internal findings made by Qualys, and then assigns its own score. The TruRisk insight feature has found a small number of assets with high vulnerability scores, though I am cautious since some information is classified. Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution.

Read full review

Corey Cole

Service Coordinator - Technology Security at a government with 10,001+ employees

The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain

Only the administrator was using the product. He used it to read reports as part of our compliance programs. It wasn't heavily used by a lot of users. The tool comes in at a large scale, and we tried to scale it down. The scaling did not apply to us. It was neither difficult nor easy. I rate the scalability a five out of ten. We had some challenges while scaling it down. It could do 10,000 devices, and we wanted to use it for ten devices. The process was difficult and expensive. We did not need the product anymore.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Extensive exploit database and seamless integration enhance penetration testing capabilities

The automated approach in the audits or in the hacking testing with Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved because even the same attack you provide today will go in different ways another day. I prefer when the auditor or pen-tester provides the attack in a non-automated mode. For some, it might be a valuable option, but I'm not sure it's valuable for us, as after the attack has been provided, we should release a report detailing how it transpired and what the customer should improve to block this way of attack. If the attack was provided in an automated mode, you cannot receive sufficient information that helps with this final report for the customer. While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system. Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved in areas concerning the experience with finding particular scripts pre-installed in the solution. Customers, administrators, and pen-testers spend considerable time trying to locate the specific component they need by the name of the technique or the name of the attack, so any improvements in making it easier to find those predefined components by name or timeframe would be beneficial. Search filters could be a correct improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution."

"The scalability is good as well. I would rate it ten out of ten."

"Qualys TotalCloud has improved our security posture."

"Qualys TotalCloud's most valuable features are its cloud security posture management, Kubernetes, and container security capabilities."

"Qualys TotalCloud fulfills all these needs."

"I would definitely recommend Qualys TotalCloud to other users."

"While automatic inventory detection upon connection is a helpful feature, a truly valuable capability would be assessing an environment's security posture against Azure and CIS best practices."

"TotalCloud's best feature is the integration of cloud accounts. It helps with the risk and security posture management of our cloud infrastructure."

More Qualys TotalCloud pros

"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."

"The company probably chose this solution because they thought that they would be getting the best bang for their buck."

"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."

"Tripwire IP360 helps me to discover most of the vulnerabilities, and I like the way that it prioritizes these vulnerabilities, as it allows me to focus on the most important ones first and then follow up with the rest."

"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."

"This product detects vulnerabilities which exist in the environment, and provides enough information that allows for remediation, thereby securing the environment."

"Tripwire is one of the most mature in terms of companies, suites, support, everything, much more than any other product."

"It has enhanced the security program by ensuring that all external-facing systems are scanned on a routine basis."

"I would definitely recommend Metasploit to others."

"The most valuable features of Metasploit include its powerful capabilities for exploitation and scanning."

"Rapid7 has a significant advantage in providing a clear picture of my environment."

"The greatest advantage of Rapid7 Metasploit is that it is the only system that can directly exploit vulnerabilities on the Metasploit platform."

"It is scalable. It's in line with our needs."

"The search engine is actually pretty cool, it allows you to search the vulnerability very fast, and the big difference is that the exploit you see on Metasploit has been tested and imported, it's going to work and it is not going to crash anything."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the scripts, the modules, and the tools that the Rapid7 Metasploit framework has."

"Overall, it is a very good product for penetration testing."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pros

Cons

"Some major banks and insurance companies require an on-premises solution for comprehensive vulnerability management, which TotalCloud does not offer."

"I sometimes have difficulty detecting or uninstalling certain versions of applications, which I have to do manually."

"The cloud licensing unit system is unclear, especially since "units" aren't well-defined."

"The response part of the Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) module can be improved."

"The onboarding process is a bit difficult. In the initial phase, it is very difficult to understand the features, what the dashboard contains, and what criteria they are using."

"There is a lack of data segregation according to criticality or inventory."

"I think Qualys TotalCloud needs to improve its handling of zero-day vulnerabilities and supply chain management because modern ransomware attacks not only target prime critical infrastructures but also the supply chain system."

"Areas that need improvement in every solution include the remediation part. The remediation steps should be simple enough for everyone to understand."

More Qualys TotalCloud cons

"If you are looking for better reporting capabilities and vulnerability tracking over time for remediation purposes, then this is not the best solution."

"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."

"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"The reporting functions can use improvement."

"We would like to have better reporting capabilities and for them to be more granular."

"For IP360, unfortunately, scans for certain vulnerabilities often cause issues, as they are mainly false positive."

"Integration with popular vulnerability scanners would be a useful feature."

"The solution should improve the responsiveness of its live technical support."

"Support is another area where improvement is needed, particularly for assisting non-security users."

"I think areas with shortcomings that need improvement are more integration and automation."

"The solution should be more user friendly."

"The reporting feature needs improvement. The time taken to fetch reports based on the number of events can be extensive, unlike Tenable, which is more user-friendly and faster."

"While Metasploit excels in vulnerability assessment, it could improve in vulnerability management."

"At the time I was using it, the graphical user interface needed some improvements."

More Rapid7 Metasploit cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."

"Although Qualys TotalCloud is relatively expensive due to its unique automation features, its cost-effectiveness is rated an eight out of ten, with ten being the most costly."

"Qualys TotalCloud is cost-efficient and was selected for its value compared to other products."

"Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility."

"Qualys TotalCloud offers good pricing that is affordable and competitive with the market. Our partnership also provides us with additional benefits."

"The cost is high, but it meets our organizational needs."

"TotalCloud's price is about right where I would expect it to be."

"I am not sure about the pricing. From what I understand, it is a bit on the higher side, but I do not have the exact numbers."

More Qualys TotalCloud pricing and cost advice

"The product was expensive for us."

"I believe the price compares well within the market."

"The cost is approximately $15 per device."

"I have used the free version of Rapid7 Metasploit."

"It is a reasonably priced solution. I would rate it from five out of ten."

"There are two versions available, one of which is the Pro version, and the other is the free version."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's pricing a six. So it's fairly priced."

"It is expensive. Our license expired, and our company is not thinking to renew because of our budget."

"Rapid7 Metasploit is cheaper than Tenable.io Vulnerability Management."

"I use the open-source version of this product. Pricing is not relevant."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?

The price is very expensive, actually.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?

Areas that need improvement in every solution include the remediation part. The remediation steps should be simple en...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?

Our use case involves the assets that we have under cloud, the assets exposed to the internet, and the internal appli...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

The pricing of Rapid7 Metasploit is quite affordable. It has a free version that many customers start with, and after...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

The automated approach in the audits or in the hacking testing with Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved because even ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit as a distributor, as an integrator, and as a user. I use Rapid7 Metasploit in my company inte...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 6% of the time

JupiterOne vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

Nucleus Security vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys TotalCloud Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 6% of the time

BMC Helix Automation Console vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TotalCloud

June 2026

Download Qualys TotalCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360

June 2026

Download Fortra Tripwire IP360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

June 2026

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan

IP360

Metasploit

Overview

Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.

Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.

What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?

Accurate Vulnerability Reports: Delivers precise and actionable insights for risk mitigation.
Zero-Day Detection: Identifies and addresses zero-day vulnerabilities proactively.
Unified Threat Assessment: Offers comprehensive evaluation of threats across the environment.
Extensive Risk Management: Manages risks effectively with advanced insights and prioritization.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides non-stop surveillance for vulnerabilities and threats.
Cloud-Native Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts using automation.
FlexScan for Internet-Facing VMs: Scans external VMs efficiently to detect vulnerabilities.
Dashboard Risk Visualization: Clear visualization helps prioritize vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response across clouds.
Time Savings: Automation reduces time spent on manual vulnerability management.
Resource Efficiency: Better allocation of resources through streamlined workflows.
Enhanced Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities for effective mitigation.
Integrated Cloud Accounts: Facilitates seamless cloud management and security.

Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.

Qualys

Tripwire IP360 is a powerful vulnerability management solution that identifies and prioritizes network vulnerabilities for remediation. It is highly effective in scanning devices and applications, improving security posture, ensuring compliance, and managing risks.

Users value its detailed reporting, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other security tools for efficient security management.

Fortra

Rapid7 Metasploit provides robust exploitation capabilities, vulnerability assessment, and seamless integration with InsightVM, enhancing penetration testing and security awareness.

Rapid7 Metasploit stands out in the cybersecurity sphere for its extensive exploit modules and automated testing processes. It supports multiple interfaces and databases, simplifying exploit development and facilitating network scanning through integration with Nmap. Its emphasis on vulnerability discovery and incident detection positions it as a key tool in various IT environments, despite limitations in GUI effectiveness and exploit update speeds.

What are the key features of Rapid7 Metasploit?

Exploitation Capabilities: Offers a vast array of exploit modules for advanced penetration testing.
Automation: Streamlines testing processes, ensuring efficient workflow.
Integration: Works with tools like Nmap for enhanced network scanning.
Open Source: Leverages extensive user contributions for diverse payload options.
User Interface: Intuitive design assists in phishing email generation and testing.

What benefits can users expect from Rapid7 Metasploit?

Comprehensive Testing: Enables thorough vulnerability assessments across environments.
Incident Detection: Facilitates early identification and response to security threats.
Efficiency: Automates redundant tasks, reducing manual effort.
Insightful Reporting: Provides detailed analysis for informed decision-making.

In industries such as government and education, Rapid7 Metasploit integrates into security protocols and training programs. Its deployment on platforms like Kali Linux aligns with IP assets for effective scanning and phishing detection. Organizations benefit from its ability to track processes and collaborate securely with entities, enhancing overall cybersecurity readiness.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclays 15. Bayer 16. Bechtel 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Cisco 21. CocaCola 22. Comcast 23. Dell 24. Deutsche Bank 25. eBay 26. ExxonMobil 27. FedEx 28. Ford 29. General Electric 30. Google 31. HP 32. IBM

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

June 2026

Free Report: Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.