Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs Tenable Nessus comparison

Fortra and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Fortra is ranked #55, while Tenable is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Fortra holds a 0.6% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Read 6 Fortra Tripwire IP360 reviews

957 Views
775 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Tenable Nessus

Read 88 Tenable Nessus reviews

9,827 Views
8,943 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Tenable Nessus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Tenable Nessus are both products in the vulnerability management category. Nessus is seen as superior due to its extensive features and adaptability, making it a preferred choice despite Tripwire IP360's strong enterprise-level offerings.

Features: Fortra Tripwire IP360 provides robust network discovery, detailed risk assessment, and vulnerability prioritization. It also features advanced profiling capabilities that cater to complex infrastructures. Tenable Nessus delivers high-speed asset discovery and configuration auditing. Threat detection is a key feature, along with extensive plugin support that allows for adaptable integration across different network environments.

Room for Improvement: Fortra Tripwire IP360 could improve its initial setup cost barrier, enhance support for smaller enterprises, and streamline its profiling capabilities for broader applicability. Tenable Nessus can further develop its customer service options, improve its user interface for better ease-of-use, and expand its documentation for more comprehensive understanding for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra Tripwire IP360 offers flexible deployment options suitable for large infrastructures and provides dedicated support, making it ideal for enterprises with specific needs. Tenable Nessus offers quicker setup processes with accessible documentation and community support options, emphasizing a self-service approach.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra Tripwire IP360 has a higher initial setup cost, providing significant returns through specialized services over time. Tenable Nessus presents a more affordable entry point suitable for various budgets, delivering value through continuous updates and threat adaptability. Nessus's cost-effective licensing offers a favorable ROI for its comprehensive scanning capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Tenable Nessus Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Tenable Nessus

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

55th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tenable Nessus

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Fortra Tripwire IP360 is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Nessus is 5.0%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable Nessus	5.0%
Fortra Tripwire IP360	0.6%
Other	94.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Corey Cole

Service Coordinator - Technology Security at a government with 10,001+ employees

The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain

Only the administrator was using the product. He used it to read reports as part of our compliance programs. It wasn't heavily used by a lot of users. The tool comes in at a large scale, and we tried to scale it down. The scaling did not apply to us. It was neither difficult nor easy. I rate the scalability a five out of ten. We had some challenges while scaling it down. It could do 10,000 devices, and we wanted to use it for ten devices. The process was difficult and expensive. We did not need the product anymore.

Read full review

MohammedJaffir

Founder at Cipheroot

Has enabled me to reduce false positives and perform deep credential auditing with seamless integrations

I mostly use the configuration audit feature for the audit configuration as a scan policy, and I will use it for credential audit, which helps me scan credentials access such as local administrator or root access, performing a deeper and more accurate check of local configuration settings and file systems, making it a highly recommended feature. Regarding integration capabilities, we can integrate Tenable Nessus with SIM tools such as Splunk, IBM QRadar, and Azure Sentinel, as well as with ticketing systems such as ServiceNow, Jira, and Slack. There is no complexity as it is very easy to integrate everything. In terms of the reporting feature, while vulnerability scanning can throw some false positives, Tenable Nessus has very few, achieving a reduction of 75% to 80% false positives with manual analysis needed. We can generate standard Nessus reports that typically include host summaries and vulnerabilities by host and plugin, alongside solutions and remediation recommendations. The main benefits I get from Tenable Nessus are complete asset inventory and comprehensive attack surface management, allowing us to prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk, focusing on true risk and threat path analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."

"Tripwire is one of the most mature in terms of companies, suites, support, everything, much more than any other product."

"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."

"The company probably chose this solution because they thought that they would be getting the best bang for their buck."

"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."

"This product detects vulnerabilities which exist in the environment, and provides enough information that allows for remediation, thereby securing the environment."

"It has enhanced the security program by ensuring that all external-facing systems are scanned on a routine basis."

"We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equipment, and appliances in our infrastructure."

"Out of the box, the product works well for us, so it's not a tool that we need to customize very much."

"The most valuable feature is the installation of Tenable which is incredibly easy."

"Makes ransomware checking and OS auditing and implementation relatively easy."

"Tenable Nessus is one of the best vulnerability assessment tools, that I know."

"Its initial setup was simple and straightforward."

"We looked at Tenable, Qualys and Rapid7. We found Tenable was the best of all three."

"Tenable Nessus is cheap and flexible."

More Tenable Nessus pros

Cons

"For IP360, unfortunately, scans for certain vulnerabilities often cause issues, as they are mainly false positive."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."

"If you are looking for better reporting capabilities and vulnerability tracking over time for remediation purposes, then this is not the best solution."

"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."

"The reporting functions can use improvement."

"We would like to have better reporting capabilities and for them to be more granular."

"They should improve the I/O reporting and the customized spreadsheet export feature."

"Tenable Nessus could improve the reporting."

"The reporting is a bit cumbersome."

"There should be a possibility to install agents on scanned machines. Tenable IO provides the capability of using local agents to check local problems, but this feature is not there in Tenable Nessus Professional. It would be nice to have something similar in Tenable Nessus Professional. We should have the capability to use local agents installed on the machines to locally check a problem."

"This is still a maturing product. Tenable is only a scanner for one ability, while other solutions like Rapid7 have more tools for verification. We still have to manually verify to see if the vulnerability is a false positive or not."

"Based on my experience, the pricing for Tenable Nessus is somewhat higher, but customers still want to pay for it, so it remains acceptable."

"We have had some false positives in the past, which we hope can improve in the future."

"The reports are okay, but the interface is a bit difficult to navigate in some cases."

More Tenable Nessus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the price compares well within the market."

"The product was expensive for us."

"Nessus Manager is not an expensive product. It has its limitations, but the pricing reflects that. We have a yearly subscription."

"Nessus is affordable, but its licensing model could be improved with more flexibility for adding assets."

"The price is reasonable."

"We pay approximately $2,500 on a yearly basis."

"This solution is affordable."

"I would like to see better discounts."

"We incurred a single cost for a perpetual license, although I cannot comment on the price as this is above my management level."

"I think the price is fairly affordable. It provides a license that is fair."

More Tenable Nessus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?

You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable Nessus?

We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 18% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 13% of the time

BMC Helix Automation Console vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 10% of the time

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable Nessus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360

March 2026

Download Fortra Tripwire IP360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Nessus

February 2026

Download Tenable Nessus product report

Also Known As

IP360

No data available

Overview

Tripwire IP360 is a powerful vulnerability management solution that identifies and prioritizes network vulnerabilities for remediation. It is highly effective in scanning devices and applications, improving security posture, ensuring compliance, and managing risks.

Users value its detailed reporting, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other security tools for efficient security management.

Fortra

Tenable Nessus enhances cybersecurity by detecting vulnerabilities with comprehensive scanning, user-friendly dashboards, and automated reporting, providing value in asset management, configuration audits, and compliance.

Providing real-time monitoring and ease of use, Nessus stands out with its integration capabilities, predictive prioritization, extensive plugin system, and cost-effectiveness. It supports vulnerability assessments for networks, applications, and devices, offering detailed reports for continuous security improvement. Nessus' capabilities extend across on-premise and cloud deployments, aiding compliance and remediation processes while aligning with security standards. While robust, it could benefit from enhanced cloud capabilities, improved scanning accuracy, and more flexible licensing options.

What are the standout features of Tenable Nessus?

Comprehensive Scanning: Covers platforms for in-depth vulnerability detection.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Simplifies monitoring with intuitive interfaces.
Automated Reporting: Streamlines data presentation and dissemination.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with other tools for enhanced functionality.
Predictive Prioritization: Focuses on vulnerabilities with the greatest impact potential.

What benefits and ROI should users expect when evaluating Tenable Nessus in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides strong value for investment in anomaly detection.
Real-Time Monitoring: Keeps security threats in check continuously.
Asset Management: Aids in tracking and securing organization-wide assets.
Detailed Reporting: Offers clear insights into compliance and security posture.

Tenable Nessus is implemented widely across industries for internal and external vulnerability assessments and management, aiding organizations in scanning servers, workstations, and network devices. Benefiting sectors prioritize security within their unique environments, leveraging Nessus for its thorough reports and compliance assurance.

Tenable

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclays 15. Bayer 16. Bechtel 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Cisco 21. CocaCola 22. Comcast 23. Dell 24. Deutsche Bank 25. eBay 26. ExxonMobil 27. FedEx 28. Ford 29. General Electric 30. Google 31. HP 32. IBM

Bitbrains, Tesla, Just Eat, Crosskey Banking Solutions, Covenant Health, Youngstown State University

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Tenable Nessus

March 2026

Free Report: Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Tenable Nessus

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Tenable Nessus and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Tenable Nessus report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.