Automox vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Automox and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Automox is ranked #36 with an average rating of 9.0, while Rapid7 is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Automox holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Rapid7’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 18 Automox reviews

2,112 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rapid7 Metasploit

Read 22 Rapid7 Metasploit reviews

3,613 Views
3,107 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Automox

Rapid7 Metasploit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Rapid7 Metasploit and Automox compete in cybersecurity. Rapid7 Metasploit holds an edge in penetration testing and support, while Automox shines in cost-effective and efficient endpoint management solutions.

Features: Rapid7 Metasploit provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments, in-depth exploit development tools, and robust penetration testing capabilities. Automox focuses on automated patch management, real-time endpoint security, and streamlined software update processes.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 Metasploit could enhance its automation features, improve user interface design, and streamline deployment processes. Automox might benefit from expanding advanced security features, offering deeper analytics, and improving integration capabilities with other security tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 Metasploit offers a versatile deployment with strong technical support. Automox provides easy cloud-based deployment that reduces setup time and offers responsive maintenance-focused customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 Metasploit generally involves a higher initial setup cost but offers a robust ROI through advanced features. Automox provides competitive pricing with scalable solutions, focusing on cost efficiency and ROI through effective resource management.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.4

Automox enhances efficiency in patch management, saving time and resources, improving compliance, and offering better visibility and security.

Sentiment score

4.3

Rapid7 Metasploit efficiently identifies vulnerabilities and saves costs but is average for experienced users or those using Qualys/Nessus.

It is a cloud-based solution, so you do not need on-premises infrastructure, which saves hardware.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

Offered an additional remote solution, all while saving a lot of time and cost through troubleshooting.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Metasploit has helped save time, especially with testing websites or VIPD projects.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

The ROI can be very rapid for organizations using vulnerability assessment for the first time.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.5

Automox’s customer service is highly praised for responsiveness, expertise, and efficiency, surpassing larger companies in user satisfaction.

Sentiment score

5.9

Rapid7 Metasploit support has mixed reviews, with helpful resources but varying response times and effectiveness compared to Cisco.

They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.

Robert Araya

Network & Security Administrator at a legal firm with 51-200 employees

They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The customer support has been excellent as the support team is always responsive and proactive.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Rapid7 sometimes struggles with queries from non-security people, whereas Tenable is more patient.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

The customer support is excellent

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.6

Automox is highly scalable and cloud-based, effectively managing numerous devices, despite minor manageability and console load time issues.

Sentiment score

5.1

Rapid7 Metasploit's scalability opinions vary, some see limitations, others appreciate flexibility; performance varies by project and infrastructure.

It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox scalability is excellent because it caters to my organization needs and can handle our organizational needs, ensuring that all our devices are well patched.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

Automox's scalability is excellent as it has continued to grow with my organization and caters to my organization's needs.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Metasploit can handle big projects and is already prepared for them.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

Rapid7 Metasploit is highly scalable.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Rapid7 Metasploit has limited scalability based on my experience, as the customer receives the full functionality of the product with the license.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

Automox is praised for its stability, reliable performance, prompt incident response, and efficient patching, with minimal downtime.

Sentiment score

7.8

Rapid7 Metasploit's stability is highly praised, with recent versions improving and rated 8-9/10, despite occasional network issues.

It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

I have not experienced any lagging or downtime

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

I can confirm that Automox is very stable.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

I have never faced any technical issues or downtimes.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

I find Metasploit to be very stable, and I would rate its stability as a nine out of ten.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Room For Improvement

Automox needs better sync, user access, automation, UI, bandwidth management, notifications, reports, and remote support for Linux/iOS.

Rapid7 Metasploit needs faster updates, improved tools integration, better UI, enhanced features, and updated evasion capabilities for modern defenses.

An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The integration is seamless.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

Sometimes the endpoint will stop talking to the main console, which generally requires a reinstall on the endpoint.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

The time taken to fetch reports based on the number of events can be extensive.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Setup Cost

Automox offers cost-effective per-endpoint pricing, scalability, and comprehensive support with a valuable free trial for evaluation.

Rapid7 Metasploit's pricing ranges from free to $20,000, with varied opinions on its affordability compared to competitors.

Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel from one place to another to go on site and troubleshoot devices.

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

the price has always been competitive and very cost-effective

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

The cost is approximately $15 per device.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Metasploit is cheaper than Nessus and offers a more robust community edition that provides a good experience for studying Metasploit.

Nuki Agustino Wono

Senior Security Consultant at ITSEC Asia

After that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep integration with InsightVM.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Valuable Features

Automox offers automated, cloud-native patching with cross-platform compatibility, customizable worklets, and an intuitive dashboard for simplified security management.

Rapid7 Metasploit excels in penetration testing with strong integration, comprehensive features, and efficient management in a unified platform.

One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox allows me to patch all devices regardless of the operating system.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place.

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

InsightVM searches for potential threats and vulnerabilities of the infrastructure, and after that, Rapid7 Metasploit validates whether we can break the system using this vulnerability or threat, serving as a validator component of the InsightVM solution.

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

The most valuable features of Metasploit include its powerful capabilities for exploitation and scanning.

MuhammadMurtaza

Information security engineer at Cyberisk

For more quotes and insights, download the Rapid7 Metasploit report

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

36th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th), Patch Management (14th)

Rapid7 Metasploit

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Rapid7 Metasploit	1.7%
Automox	0.5%
Other	97.8%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Extensive exploit database and seamless integration enhance penetration testing capabilities

The automated approach in the audits or in the hacking testing with Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved because even the same attack you provide today will go in different ways another day. I prefer when the auditor or pen-tester provides the attack in a non-automated mode. For some, it might be a valuable option, but I'm not sure it's valuable for us, as after the attack has been provided, we should release a report detailing how it transpired and what the customer should improve to block this way of attack. If the attack was provided in an automated mode, you cannot receive sufficient information that helps with this final report for the customer. While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system. Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved in areas concerning the experience with finding particular scripts pre-installed in the solution. Customers, administrators, and pen-testers spend considerable time trying to locate the specific component they need by the name of the technique or the name of the attack, so any improvements in making it easier to find those predefined components by name or timeframe would be beneficial. Search filters could be a correct improvement.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

The pricing of Rapid7 Metasploit is quite affordable. It has a free version that many customers start with, and after that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys Patch Management vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

March 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2026

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

No data available

Metasploit

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.