No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Acunetix vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] comparison

Invicti and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Additionally, 89% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.
Acunetix
Read 36 Acunetix reviews
  • 11,357 Views
  • 6,133 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Acunetix and Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: August 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (14th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th), Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (6th)
Synopsys API Security Testi...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Rahul Kumar
Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees
Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.
Read full review
UmarQureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
UmarQureshi
Security Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support
We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning."
"Segregation of reports is really, really good with Acunetix; it provides us with a lot of in-depth details."
"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."
"With Acunetix, we cut the time to make infrastructures and web applications for our colleagues more secure, and for one application with two or three critical vulnerabilities and some other vulnerabilities, it took about a week to remediate issues because the scan and findings were really fast."
"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."
"Overall, I believe Acunetix to be one of the best products on the market."
"We are happy, we're not unhappy with Acunetix, but we are very impressed by some of the things that it has been doing."
More Acunetix pros
"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."
"The technical support from Synopsys API Security Testing is amazing."
 

Cons

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."
"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."
"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."
"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."
"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."
"Acunetix provides the benefit of saving time for an end user. I would not say it saves money because the cost and license of Acunetix is far more than what others offer."
"Improving the handling of false positives would be beneficial because it can be challenging to trust the findings flagged by Acunetix, and those findings must be manually validated."
"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."
More Acunetix cons
"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."
"We haven't covered all the areas yet in our business. It's still being scaled up within the organization. We've probably covered 10 percent of the business. I don't think we've seen a proper ROI yet."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."
"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."
"The price is exceptionally high."
"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."
"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."
"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."
"The solution is expensive."
"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."
More Acunetix pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise19
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?
Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix
Compared 8% of the time
OWASP Zap vs Acunetix Logo
OWASP Zap vs Acunetix
Compared 6% of the time
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Acunetix Logo
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Acunetix
Compared 5% of the time
Checkmarx One vs Acunetix Logo
Checkmarx One vs Acunetix
Compared 4% of the time
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix Logo
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix
Compared 4% of the time
More Acunetix Competitors
Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 27% of the time
SonarQube vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
SonarQube vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 24% of the time
Aikido Security vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
Aikido Security vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
OWASP Zap vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
OWASP Zap vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 11% of the time
Seeker Interactive vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Logo
Seeker Interactive vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]
Compared 7% of the time
More Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Acunetix
August 2026
Acunetix reportDownload Acunetix product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2026
Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] reportDownload Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
No data available
 

Overview

Acunetix is a dynamic application security tool used globally for web application vulnerability scanning, focusing on SQL injection and cross-site scripting.

Acunetix provides a comprehensive web vulnerability assessment platform designed for identifying and remediating security threats. Users benefit from its ability to schedule scans, boasting a fast detection rate for common vulnerabilities. The tool's centralized dashboard helps organizations with compliance monitoring and features such as crawling and login sequence enhancements, contributing depth to its security assessments. Despite high praise for its integration capabilities and automated scanning that saves time, pricing and false positives present challenges. Organizations often use Acunetix to maintain internal security and evaluate pre-release environments.

What are Acunetix's main features?
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed reports assist in security analysis and compliance audits.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Simple navigation enhances user experience.
  • Scheduled Scans: Automation of scans allows for continuous monitoring.
  • Fast Detection: Quickly identifies vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
  • Integration Capabilities: Scalable solutions with compatibility across applications.
  • Crawling & Login Sequence: Improves depth in security analysis.
What benefits should businesses look for in reviews?
  • Low False Positive Rate: Accurate vulnerability detection saves time in analysis.
  • Time Efficiency: Automated scans reduce manual workload, improving team productivity.
  • Scalability: Integration features help accommodate growth and complexity.
  • Compliance Support: Centralized dashboard supports regulatory compliance checks.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Acunetix assists in protecting sensitive data through robust scanning and reporting capabilities. Its ability to perform dynamic assessments makes it a chosen tool in regulatory environments and development settings, offering both internal security inspections and pre-release evaluations.

Invicti

AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

Black Duck
 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: August 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.