No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Adabas vs FoxPro [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adabas
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Non-Relational Databases (10th)
FoxPro [EOL]
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Adabas?
Leave a review
it_user4401 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
FoxPro software development system is used in designing sophisticated database applications
- I noticed that FoxPro is slow and this was a problem for me - It does not have high level of administrative security - It is not very portable, for using a very portable DMS I recommend Microsoft Access - When I needed to process large quantities of records per hour I was dissapointed by FoxPro
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik
Vocational Training Council, Advantage Sales and Marketing, Capital Nomura Securities Public Company Limited, King Saud University
Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxData, Oracle, Apple and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.