No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Claris FileMaker vs FoxPro [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claris FileMaker
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Non-Relational Databases (3rd)
FoxPro [EOL]
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1668102 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director, Service Training at a construction company with 5,001-10,000 employees
User friendly with a good interface and good scalability
I like FileMaker due to the fact that it's relational. You can put it right in and it's user-friendly. It's easy to code and it's easy to make things. You can design reports and so on. It doesn't require a whole lot of coding experience. I've used FileMaker in the past. I've used a program, platform called Omnis, which is a RAD, a rapid application development program. We're just trying to find some tools. We've got lots of data, lots of data and Excel has not changed since 1989 or thereabouts. The structure has not changed. It's still the same old entry formula, and you've got limited space and no debugger. Its reporting is not easy. You could spend your life understanding Excel. No one can afford to do that anymore. FileMaker is much easier. It's a pretty good tool and there's a lot of support and there's a lot of people out there that know how to use it. FileMaker has done a good job setting up value-added resellers, much like Adobe Connect. It has a pretty good interface.
it_user4401 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
FoxPro software development system is used in designing sophisticated database applications
- I noticed that FoxPro is slow and this was a problem for me - It does not have high level of administrative security - It is not very portable, for using a very portable DMS I recommend Microsoft Access - When I needed to process large quantities of records per hour I was dissapointed by FoxPro

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The cross-platform Mac and Windows feature is most valuable. I can do all sorts of stuff with this tool. It has got all sorts of automation capabilities. I have used some of them, but I have barely scratched the surface of what it can do on automation. It is user-friendly, and it integrates well with other products. There are other third-party options that you can buy or in some cases, download for free to even extend it further. I use one or two of those."
"It's a good application that's easy to use."
"FileMaker is much easier, it's a pretty good tool and there's a lot of support and there's a lot of people out there that know how to use it."
"It's a pretty good tool and there's a lot of support and there's a lot of people out there that know how to use it."
"The database is the most useful aspect of the solution; it's a good application that's easy to use."
"I have found its resilience to attack most valuable. It's really difficult to attack the software."
"I love this product; I have been using it for 30 years, and it has got lots of capabilities, so don't sell it short because it can do a lot more than you might think it can."
"I have found its resilience to attack most valuable; it's really difficult to attack the software and it's really stable as well."
"FoxPro is very stable, it has become one of the most stable and bug free software development system on the market."
 

Cons

"There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently."
"The UE is not very up-to-date. It looks like something that was created in the 90s. In that sense, the user experience is lacking."
"Customer Service: We work from Asia and support is particular poor."
"It has some limits in terms of scalability. FileMaker is good for small and medium-sized companies. When data grows, in the case of a bigger corporation, it will be difficult to scale it."
"FileMaker has some convoluted pricing."
"Multimedia data management is not really developed in FileMaker."
"The UE is not very up-to-date. It looks like something that was created in the 90s."
"They're always improving it, and I have been quite pleased with their improvements. There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently. They should make a structure so that you can have the data in one file and the app, the scripts, and the program in another file. I would like to be able to easily share scripts between different databases. I write stuff, and some of the functions are shared across different databases. So, I have to copy them from one database to another. I wouldn't mind an infrastructure where I had a file, and on loading the program, this file is loaded with the functions that I had written. I can then call them from any database that I happen to be using. Currently, you have a database open that has all of its data pieces and program pieces, and then you open another database that has got all of its data pieces and program pieces. Nothing is shared between them. When I write a complex function and I want to use it in two or three different databases, I have to copy it to each one of them and also remember where all it is used. It would be good if it has a little bit different organizational structure so that you could put your shared stuff in one place, and it loads the stuff. It is just an architectural difference. I've sent this requirement to them, but I doubt if that's going to happen. It is a huge system, and making changes for a single individual doesn't happen that quickly."
"I noticed that FoxPro is slow and this was a problem for me."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is pretty reasonable. I am at a university. We get educational discount pricing from most of the major vendors."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental
Vocational Training Council, Advantage Sales and Marketing, Capital Nomura Securities Public Company Limited, King Saud University
Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxData, Oracle, Apple and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.