Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adaptavist and Microsoft are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Adaptavist is ranked #20, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Adaptavist holds a 2.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to Microsoft’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Adaptavist users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Read 5 Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reviews

948 Views
815 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

4,831 Views
1,401 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira are two robust tools competing in the testing tools category. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless Jira integration and advanced test management features.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers broad functionality within Microsoft's suite, streamlined software development lifecycle phases, and comprehensive integration with Microsoft's ecosystem. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira provides seamless Jira integration, effective tracking and management of test cases, and specialized test management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional needs better reporting features, simplified workflows, and enhancements tailored to unique user needs. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira requires improved documentation, better support for complex test scenarios, and user feedback leveraging for specific tool refinements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional features a straightforward deployment process, particularly for Microsoft ecosystem users, and responsive customer service. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira has an easy deployment process, strong customer support for Jira teams, and high satisfaction with customer service similar to Visual Studio Test Professional.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional users indicate high setup costs but justified ROI due to integrated toolset benefits. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira offers competitive pricing, strong ROI, and high value from its Jira-oriented test management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 3.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	3.6%
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira	2.0%
Other	94.4%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Ramakanta Sahu

Director of Product at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags

I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."

"The program is very stable and scalable."

"My impression of the stability is very positive."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Our software development process primarily uses Adaptive Test Management for Jira to monitor real-time risks across all stories and sprint planning. Additionally, we use it to create action plans for high-priority risks."

"The program is very stable, and that is why we have so much success with it."

"Test Management for Jira provides a repository for our test cases."

"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."

"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."

"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."

"It is very easy to use, and you can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."

"It is a good and user-friendly tool."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the speed of the application, it is a well-documented, complete product, and reasonably priced."

"MTM is very good for maintaining the test plan, test suite and all, and can link automation scripts with existing manual test cases."

"The stability has always been very good."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."

"Capability for scalability is basic, it's not as sophisticated as I would like."

"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr it takes about 5-10 minutes."

"Something that needs to improve is the model of the licensing. For instance, if you have two packs from two servers, you need to buy two licenses."

"I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable."

"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."

"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."

"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."

"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."

"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."

"The product must provide more integration."

"Its UI could be better."

"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."

"The documentation is limited."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slightly higher than similar products, maybe five to ten percent more."

"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."

"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"Our company pays a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"I think that the pricing is quite good."

"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?

We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText DevPartner vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 12% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 8% of the time

PractiTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 3% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

September 2026

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira report

Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

August 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira delivers comprehensive test management capabilities with features for step reuse, test case repositories, and risk tracking, enhancing project management through sophisticated metrics and flexible configurations.

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira integrates Microsoft services, offering a repository for test cases and supporting automation tools. Users benefit from risk metrics and flexible configurations for specific project requirements. Enhanced reporting and metrics empower project oversight, providing insights into sprint progress and overarching project goals. The integrated dashboard addresses workflow challenges, facilitating strategic planning. However, areas needing improvement include integration, customization, and intuitive reporting. Users mention the test creation process as time-consuming due to multiple tabs, and licensing could be further streamlined. The disparity between its query functionality and Jira can confuse users, indicating a need for more unified dashboard gadgets and AI-driven test failure analysis.

What are the key features of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

Step reuse with Microsoft services streamlines repetitive tasks.
A test case repository simplifies test organization.
Automation tool integration enhances testing efficiency.
Risk metrics and count track project risks effectively.
Flexible add-on configurations meet specific project needs.
Comprehensive reporting and metrics offer high-level project views.
Dashboard features tackle challenges and improve workflow.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Streamlined test processes reduce redundancy.
Efficient testing through automation saves time and resources.
Enhanced risk tracking improves project predictability.
Flexible configurations align with team needs.
Data-driven insights support informed decision-making.
Improved strategic planning with proactive dashboard solutions.

In the finance sector, organizations utilize Adaptavist Test Management for Jira primarily for test case writing and execution, often deployed on-premises. The tool aids in contract management and internal business workflows, facilitating department collaboration between teams like marketing and engineering. As an agile lifecycle management plugin, it extends its reach to departments migrating from other management tools, particularly in test management applications.

Adaptavist

Visual Studio Test Professional offers sophisticated testing capabilities with a focus on integration with Azure DevOps. Supporting software development, it aids in application creation, lifecycle management, and testing, accommodating a wide array of programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features essential for software developers, including seamless integration with C# and .NET projects and extensive customization options. The platform's robust debugging, unit testing, and memory analysis help streamline the development process. Its intuitive interface and integration with tools like IntelliSense and NuGet package manager enhance productivity, alongside its collaboration capabilities with Azure DevOps. While beneficial, it faces challenges such as integration issues with CI tools, high technical skill requirements, and concerns about pricing and stability. Refinements in user interface design, platform compatibility, and support for AI and machine learning technologies remain necessary.

What are the most important features of Visual Studio Test Professional?

Seamless Integration: Works efficiently with C# and .NET, reducing setup complexities.
Intelligent Tools: Includes IntelliSense for coding, simplifying complex tasks.
Robust Debugging: Offers advanced debugging features for troubleshooting.
Extensive Customization: Adaptable to meet development needs effectively.
Azure DevOps Collaboration: Enhances project collaboration and tracking.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development workflow, saving time.
Enhanced Collaboration: Team integrations facilitate smoother project execution.
Expanded Capabilities: Supports automation, leading to increased productivity.
Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources aid in navigating platform complexities.

Visual Studio Test Professional finds its application in software development and automation testing industries, where technical teams use it to create and manage applications across multiple environments. It supports test-driven development, ensuring secure and functional project outputs, and aids in the integration of DevOps practices, enhancing collaborative efforts in software solutions creation.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear, Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

September 2026

Free Report: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.