Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adaptavist and Tricentis are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 83% of Adaptavist users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Read 5 Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reviews

948 Views
815 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 114 Tricentis Tosca reviews

23,309 Views
9,324 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,109 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (20th)

Tricentis Tosca

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

Ramakanta Sahu

Director of Product at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags

I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.

Read full review

AKSHAYRATHI

Senior engineer at Nagarro

End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data

I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

"The program is very stable and scalable."

"Test Management for Jira provides a repository for our test cases."

"My impression of the stability is very positive."

"The program is very stable, and that is why we have so much success with it."

"It is a scalable solution."

"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."

"Our software development process primarily uses Adaptive Test Management for Jira to monitor real-time risks across all stories and sprint planning. Additionally, we use it to create action plans for high-priority risks."

"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."

"The most important feature is its ability to support the technical automation of specific clients that we cannot use with other tools."

"From the commercial tool perspective, Tosca is a leader in every aspect."

"We did a full-blown POC, it was super successful and we were able to automate a large number of our scripts and save a lot of time and also automate a lot of our testing."

"One feature we like is the live connectivity of the product, in other words, you can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data."

"Tosca Continuous Integration allows you to test as soon as the code is deployed into the lower environment, giving the organization an edge by providing fast feedback in today’s fast-paced agile environment."

"The amazing features provided by Tricentis takes automation to a different world and it's fun working with it."

"The reporting is really nice."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."

"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr it takes about 5-10 minutes."

"I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable."

"Capability for scalability is basic, it's not as sophisticated as I would like."

"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."

"Something that needs to improve is the model of the licensing. For instance, if you have two packs from two servers, you need to buy two licenses."

"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."

"Technical support used to be better. It is now a bit difficult to reach out compared to previous experiences."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."

"Sometimes new features do not work as shown on slides, in the first release."

"The product needs to improve object identification. The identify with properties and anchor methods work perfectly, while the by-index and image methods may face challenges."

"It may be different for other companies, but for us, establishing a set of procedures to get people trained was important."

"The technical support services are generally good, though there are areas for improvement regarding response time and overall competence."

"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."

"The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slightly higher than similar products, maybe five to ten percent more."

"Tosca is expensive. I don't see small and medium customers going for it. It's always large enterprises that have a big pocket. It is very expensive as compared to the other tools that we have in the market. They should reduce the price by half, and if they do that, they would do better business. From the competition perspective, other solutions are at a pretty similar level. UiPath is also very expensive. One thing that I always wanted was a short-term consumption license. With Tricentis, the biggest challenge is that you have to go for a minimum of one year license, and they also try to sell you a three-year license. It would be good if people can get a three-month or four-month consumption license."

"The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."

"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."

"It is expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText DevPartner vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 12% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 9% of the time

PractiTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 7% of the time

TestRail vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 6% of the time

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

September 2026

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira report

Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

August 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira delivers comprehensive test management capabilities with features for step reuse, test case repositories, and risk tracking, enhancing project management through sophisticated metrics and flexible configurations.

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira integrates Microsoft services, offering a repository for test cases and supporting automation tools. Users benefit from risk metrics and flexible configurations for specific project requirements. Enhanced reporting and metrics empower project oversight, providing insights into sprint progress and overarching project goals. The integrated dashboard addresses workflow challenges, facilitating strategic planning. However, areas needing improvement include integration, customization, and intuitive reporting. Users mention the test creation process as time-consuming due to multiple tabs, and licensing could be further streamlined. The disparity between its query functionality and Jira can confuse users, indicating a need for more unified dashboard gadgets and AI-driven test failure analysis.

What are the key features of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

Step reuse with Microsoft services streamlines repetitive tasks.
A test case repository simplifies test organization.
Automation tool integration enhances testing efficiency.
Risk metrics and count track project risks effectively.
Flexible add-on configurations meet specific project needs.
Comprehensive reporting and metrics offer high-level project views.
Dashboard features tackle challenges and improve workflow.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Streamlined test processes reduce redundancy.
Efficient testing through automation saves time and resources.
Enhanced risk tracking improves project predictability.
Flexible configurations align with team needs.
Data-driven insights support informed decision-making.
Improved strategic planning with proactive dashboard solutions.

In the finance sector, organizations utilize Adaptavist Test Management for Jira primarily for test case writing and execution, often deployed on-premises. The tool aids in contract management and internal business workflows, facilitating department collaboration between teams like marketing and engineering. As an agile lifecycle management plugin, it extends its reach to departments migrating from other management tools, particularly in test management applications.

Adaptavist

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear, Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.