Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Tricentis qTest comparison

Adaptavist and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Adaptavist is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.0, while Tricentis is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. Adaptavist holds a 2.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to Tricentis’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Adaptavist users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Read 5 Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reviews

707 Views
580 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis qTest

Read 19 Tricentis qTest reviews

2,491 Views
1,968 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Tricentis qTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Tricentis qTest and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira are leading test management tools with distinct features. Despite positive user reviews on pricing and support for Tricentis qTest, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira's feature set often makes it a preferred choice.

Features: Tricentis qTest is praised for its comprehensive test planning and management capabilities, seamless integration with popular tools, and robust reporting features. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is highlighted for its strong integration with Jira, ease of use for Jira users, and detailed test case management features.

Room for Improvement: Users of Tricentis qTest have reported a need for better performance with large data sets, more intuitive navigation, and improved testing analytics. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira users indicate areas for improvement include enhanced user permissions management, more robust test execution reporting, and higher flexibility in custom fields.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis qTest is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is appreciated for its seamless integration with Jira, though some feedback highlights slower response times from customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis qTest users appreciate the competitive pricing and clear ROI in terms of improved testing efficiency. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira users also find the tool cost-effective, especially within the context of Jira, though the perceived value is highly dependent on Jira adoption.

To learn more, read our detailed Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Tricentis qTest Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Tricentis qTest

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis qTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 2.0%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis qTest is 6.2%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis qTest	6.2%
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira	2.0%
Other	91.8%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Ramakanta Sahu

Director of Product at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags

I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.

Read full review

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

User stories and test artifacts migrate seamlessly to innovative management tools

Customers are moving towards Tricentis due to their association with SAP. There is interest in understanding if there are connectors for converting UFT scripts to Tosca, as many customers are looking to make this transition. We have developed capabilities for automated migration from ALM to Tricentis qTest without any loss of data. However, for UFT to Tosca migration, scripts need to be rewritten as there are no automatic converters available. From a project perspective, there have not been many challenges with Tricentis products. The main improvement area would be developing a connector to move UFT scripts to Tosca, which would enable quicker and easier movement for customers. This would aid faster adoption of Tosca and ease the financial pressure on clients who currently need to invest in rewriting scripts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."

"Our software development process primarily uses Adaptive Test Management for Jira to monitor real-time risks across all stories and sprint planning. Additionally, we use it to create action plans for high-priority risks."

"Test Management for Jira provides a repository for our test cases."

"The program is very stable and scalable."

"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The program is very stable, and that is why we have so much success with it."

"My impression of the stability is very positive."

"The test automation tracking is valuable because our automated testing systems are distributed and they did not necessarily have a single point where they would come together and be reported. Having all of them report back to qTest, and having one central place where all of my test executions are tracked and reported on, is incredibly valuable because it saves time."

"Overall, the solution has increased testing efficiency by a good 95 percent."

"qTest helps us compile issues and have one place to look for them. We're not chasing down emails and other sources. So in the grand scheme of things, it does help to resolve issues faster because everyone is working off of the same information in one location."

"The solution works very well for test management and it also automates a lot of the testing functions so that you don't have to manage them in Excel spreadsheets."

"Tricentis qTest brought benefits by providing all test cases in one central repository with easy access."

"The biggest thing we've learned from this tool is the ease of using it."

"Overall, the solution has increased testing efficiency by about 60 percent, compared to what they were doing before."

"The main thing that really stuck out when we started using this tool, is the linkability of qTest to JIRA, and the traceability of tying JIRA requirement and defects directly with qTest. So when you're executing test cases, if you go to fail it, it automatically links and opens up a JIRA window. You're able to actually write up a ticket and it automatically ties it to the test case itself."

More Tricentis qTest pros

Cons

"I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable."

"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."

"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr it takes about 5-10 minutes."

"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."

"Something that needs to improve is the model of the licensing. For instance, if you have two packs from two servers, you need to buy two licenses."

"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."

"Capability for scalability is basic, it's not as sophisticated as I would like."

"As an admin, I'm unable to delete users. I'm only able to make a user inactive. This is a scenario about which I've already made a suggestion to qTest. When people leave the company, I should be able to delete them from qTest. I shouldn't have to have so many users."

"Right now, on a scale of one to five, I would say the Insights reporting engine is a three because we are facing some performance issues."

"The graphical reports, API integration with the customized automation test tools and support for the same need to be improved."

"You can add what I believe are called suites and modules. I opened a ticket on this as to what's the difference. And it seems there's very little difference. In some places, the documentation says there's no difference. You just use them to organize how you want. But they're not quite the same because there are some options you can do under one and not the other. That gets confusing. But since they are very close to the same, people use them differently and that creates a lack of consistency."

"I wouldn't say a lot of good things about Insights, but that's primarily because, with so many test cases, it is incredibly slow for us."

"Overall, it gets the job done, but it's a struggle to do it."

"We feel the integration between JIRA and qTest could be done even better. It's not as user-friendly as qTest's other features."

"Tricentis qTest's technical support team needs to improve its ability to respond to queries from users."

More Tricentis qTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."

"The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slightly higher than similar products, maybe five to ten percent more."

"Our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year."

"We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and the qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support."

"We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license."

"The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount."

"For me, pricing for Tricentis qTest is moderate, so that's a five out of ten. It's more affordable than my company's previous solution, which was Micro Focus ALM."

"Based on whatever I heard, I can say that Tricentis qTest is a little costlier than other test management tools, like Jira, Zephyr, or Xray."

"For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year."

"We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that."

More Tricentis qTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slig...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis qTest?

The solution is expensive. For the features that are available, depending on the volumes of licenses we get, we are able to get better discounts as strategic partners of Tosca. We can pass some ben...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis qTest?

One of the things I noticed was the reporting part wasn't very good. It was hard to customize the dashboards in Tricentis qTest, and there were limitations in the dashboard. There may be missing fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tricentis qTest?

The main use cases for Tricentis qTest are for test management, to keep test cases and execute those. Overall, centralized test management with Tricentis qTest was beneficial for the team's product...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText DevPartner vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 18% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 18% of the time

PractiTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 14% of the time

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 8% of the time

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Competitors

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 11% of the time

TestRail vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 9% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 8% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 6% of the time

More Tricentis qTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

May 2026

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira report

Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis qTest

April 2026

Download Tricentis qTest product report

Also Known As

No data available

qTest

Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira delivers comprehensive test management capabilities with features for step reuse, test case repositories, and risk tracking, enhancing project management through sophisticated metrics and flexible configurations.

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira integrates Microsoft services, offering a repository for test cases and supporting automation tools. Users benefit from risk metrics and flexible configurations for specific project requirements. Enhanced reporting and metrics empower project oversight, providing insights into sprint progress and overarching project goals. The integrated dashboard addresses workflow challenges, facilitating strategic planning. However, areas needing improvement include integration, customization, and intuitive reporting. Users mention the test creation process as time-consuming due to multiple tabs, and licensing could be further streamlined. The disparity between its query functionality and Jira can confuse users, indicating a need for more unified dashboard gadgets and AI-driven test failure analysis.

What are the key features of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

Step reuse with Microsoft services streamlines repetitive tasks.
A test case repository simplifies test organization.
Automation tool integration enhances testing efficiency.
Risk metrics and count track project risks effectively.
Flexible add-on configurations meet specific project needs.
Comprehensive reporting and metrics offer high-level project views.
Dashboard features tackle challenges and improve workflow.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Streamlined test processes reduce redundancy.
Efficient testing through automation saves time and resources.
Enhanced risk tracking improves project predictability.
Flexible configurations align with team needs.
Data-driven insights support informed decision-making.
Improved strategic planning with proactive dashboard solutions.

In the finance sector, organizations utilize Adaptavist Test Management for Jira primarily for test case writing and execution, often deployed on-premises. The tool aids in contract management and internal business workflows, facilitating department collaboration between teams like marketing and engineering. As an agile lifecycle management plugin, it extends its reach to departments migrating from other management tools, particularly in test management applications.

Adaptavist

Tricentis qTest, with its intuitive interface and powerful integration capabilities, is designed to streamline testing processes, offering project teams enhanced test management and traceability while allowing integration with tools like JIRA and Azure DevOps.

Tricentis qTest provides a comprehensive solution for efficient test management with centralized data storage and seamless integration with tools such as JIRA. It enables easy test case uploads and offers customizable dashboards for comprehensive reporting. Test teams benefit from automation capabilities through integrations with Azure DevOps and Selenium, facilitating real-time tracking of test executions and defects. Despite its powerful features, qTest is noted for some challenges in API documentation and reporting, and users have expressed a need for enhancements in support response and dashboard customization. Teams predominantly use qTest for linking test cases with JIRA and managing defects, valuing the centralized repository for accessing test histories and CI/CD pipeline integration.

What are the most important features of Tricentis qTest?

User-friendly Interfaces: Offers intuitive navigation and ease of use for efficient test management.
Seamless JIRA Integration: Facilitates smooth alignment of test cases with development tasks.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed insights through customizable dashboards.
Automation Capabilities: Supports integration with tools like Selenium for efficient test automation.
Real-time Tracking: Enables monitoring of test executions and defects in real time.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Tricentis qTest?

Time and Resource Savings: Streamlines processes to enhance productivity.
Enhanced Test Traceability: Improves tracking and management of test cases.
Improved Project Management: Facilitates better planning and execution with integrated tools.
Centralized Data Storage: Provides consistent and accessible data for test histories.

Tricentis qTest is widely implemented across various industries, including technology and e-commerce, with teams using it for test management and defect tracking. Its integration with tools like JIRA and Selenium supports agile development, while cloud deployment ensures the latest software version is always accessible. Organizations utilize qTest to manage complex logic and user stories efficiently, especially valuing its test execution features within CI/CD pipelines.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear, Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient

McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Tricentis qTest

April 2026

Free Report: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Tricentis qTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Tricentis qTest and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Tricentis qTest report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.