Adaptive Shield vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection comparison

Adaptive Shield and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) category. Adaptive Shield is ranked #23, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9. Adaptive Shield holds a 1.2% mindshare in ITDR, compared to Microsoft’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Adaptive Shield users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Adaptive Shield

Read 1 Adaptive Shield review

915 Views
265 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Read 21 Microsoft Entra ID Protection reviews

3,426 Views
2,193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adaptive Shield

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adaptive Shield and Microsoft Entra ID Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Huntress and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR).

To learn more, read our detailed Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adaptive Shield

Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (5th)

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (6th), Microsoft Security Suite (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) category, the mindshare of Adaptive Shield is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Protection is 6.6%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Entra ID Protection	6.6%
Adaptive Shield	1.2%
Other	92.2%

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

Featured Reviews

Asaf Rozenblum

Cyber security engineer at Checkmarx

Provides not only visibility but also remediation information and is helpful in working with people who are not in security-oriented roles

For compliance security checks, it identifies and tells you about a specific compliance, but it would be better if they also attach a link to the rule of the compliance they are referring to. That will be a lot more clear. You won't have to leave the platform every time to find information on the web. They do have a lot of things that keep you inside the app and give you clarity, but there are a couple of little things that got missed. One feature about which I have talked to them multiple times is related to being able to rescan or do a recheck on a specific security issue. Currently, when you fix something and you want to check if it is fixed, you need to power off the integration and then power it on. If there is a clickable button that can re-scan and do a single check or even the whole security check, without powering off and powering on, it will be easier and more efficient.

Read full review

Luis Gabriel Mieles Benavides

Cloud Architect at Sonda S.A.

Identity protection has strengthened daily access control and improved passwordless security

The best features of Microsoft Entra ID Protection include the password dictionary, which we do not have in Active Directory. Conditional access is excellent because we can select the location from which users authenticate, and this is the best feature for me. Another valuable feature is the ability to identify critical or suspicious computers. If computers are too old or too suspicious, the system does not allow authentication, which is excellent. The effectiveness of automated remediation for handling identity threats is great. I use passwordless authentication with cellular phone authentication, which is excellent because we do not always need a password. Microsoft Entra ID Protection is a great solution overall because it improves security in the company through identity management. It improves integration with other solutions such as Google, Gmail, Hotmail, Outlook, and Facebook. We can create different applications and integrate with different services.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security checks are valuable because you need to understand what can be improved. There is a remediation tab inside the security check, So, you don't need to go and search how to fix those things. It gives you step-by-step information for all different apps, which is a really strong feature."

"The primary and most valuable aspect of Azure AD identity is its ability to function seamlessly on both on-premise and cloud infrastructure, eliminating the need for extensive updates. However, this dual solution can pose vulnerabilities that require substantial support and security measures in the on-premise environment. Despite the challenges, it is currently not feasible to completely abandon AD, especially for companies in the sales and energy sectors. The integration with Microsoft Defender is crucial for enhancing security, making identity and security the primary focus and purpose of Azure AD."

"The most valuable features are the API apps, which I use to connect to my cloud Protection."

"The valuable features include multifactor authentication, accessory capabilities, and conditional access for specific applications."

"Microsoft's support is commendable. Their response time is quick, and they handle inquiries effectively, ensuring ongoing support processes."

"Microsoft Entra ID Protection is a great solution overall because it improves security in the company through identity management."

"For me, automatization is most valuable."

"As an end-user, I find the experience to be quite seamless. My main advantage is that I only need to manage one login and one two-factor authentication method to access all the necessary tools. I don't have to set up separate logins and authentication for each application."

"These features ease the job of security analysts, providing a better vision of user activities and potential risks."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection pros

Cons

"One feature about which I have talked to them multiple times is related to being able to rescan or do a recheck on a specific security issue. Currently, when you fix something and you want to check if it is fixed, you need to power off the integration and then power it on. If there is a clickable button that can re-scan and do a single check or even the whole security check, without powering off and powering on, it will be easier and more efficient."

"I rate the quality of support at four out of ten because of inefficiencies in the ticket handling process. Tickets often bounce from person to person, requiring the sharing of information multiple times."

"Microsoft has room for improvement in simplifying their integration with third-party solutions and making the licensing model more understandable."

"The recent CrowdStrike issue affected most systems."

"The experience is not very smooth for the user. This is an area where Microsoft could improve the authorization process."

"The solution is not optimized to work with Mac devices on a granular level. They work seamlessly with Windows but have a lot to improve to work with Mac devices. It also needs to improve stability and scalability."

"The platform's pricing and scalability need improvement."

"Entra ID lacks a function to synchronize from the cloud to the local directory. This is a significant issue since there is no write-back feature from the cloud to local, which would allow me to use my own credentials from the cloud tenant securely."

"Support or customer service with Microsoft Entra ID Protection can be challenging because you can get lost in the queue. You can open up a case, but sometimes it can be an hour or even a day between communications."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not sure about the pricing, but it is worth it."

"Azure Active Directory Identity Protection is not very expensive."

"From one to ten, if one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool a seven out of ten."

"The product cost is on the expensive side."

"The price of Azure AD is not expensive."

"The pricing is competitive in the SMA segment and runs $5-$6 per user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

The pricing for Microsoft Entra ID protection is not expensive. It varies based on the company's size and quality.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

We explore the possibilities to use Purview to control our applications, though not very deeply as it's not very helpful at this moment.For us, the most important problem is access; we need an easy...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

We are still deep involved in the use of Microsoft technology for databases and business intelligence, and in the last three years with Power Apps and Power Automate, all that means Azure services,...

See all answers

Comparisons

AppOmni vs Adaptive Shield

Compared 23% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Adaptive Shield

Compared 11% of the time

Wing Security vs Adaptive Shield

Compared 10% of the time

Obsidian CDR Platform vs Adaptive Shield

Compared 10% of the time

Grip Security vs Adaptive Shield

Compared 8% of the time

More Adaptive Shield Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 18% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 8% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 5% of the time

BloodHound Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Semperis Directory Services Protector vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

January 2026

Download Adaptive Shield product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

January 2026

Download Microsoft Entra ID Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure Active Directory Identity Protection, Azure AD Identity Protection

Overview

Adaptive Shield is a leading SaaS security posture management (SSPM) solution that provides visibility and remediation of potential risks in the SaaS estate caused by misconfigurations and misappropriated privileges. It enables security teams to locate and fix configuration weaknesses quickly, ensuring compliance with company and industry standards. The solution integrates with all types of SaaS applications, including video conferencing platforms, customer support tools, HR management systems, dashboards, workspaces, content and file-sharing applications, messaging applications, marketing platforms, and more. In addition, Adaptive Shield's framework is easy to use, intuitive, and doesn’t take long to deploy.

Adaptive Shield Features And Benefits

Adaptive Shield has many valuable key features and benefits. Some of the most useful ones include:

Flexible architecture: Adaptive Shield integrates with any SaaS app and can be live within minutes, delivering clear visibility into the whole SaaS ecosystem with a posture score per app.

Deep visibility: Adaptive Shield provides full visibility and control in a single pane of glass.

App integration: The solution can integrate with more than 50 apps and contextualizes all the items at risk to help your security teams prioritize configuration weaknesses and increase time and efficiency to remediation.

In-depth security checks: The Adaptive Shield solution has alerts and in-depth security checks by app, user, severity, or any other metric that can indicate misconfigurations in your SaaS environments. When misconfigurations happen, it automatically alerts you.

Remediation: With Adaptive Shield, you gain access to a step-by-step remediation description to see exactly how to fix SaaS misconfigurations. In addition, you can auto-remediate directly from the system or create a ticket through your ticketing system of choice.

Seamless user management and investigation: Adaptive Shield enables seamless user management and investigation across all SaaS apps - especially useful for securing sensitive users such as IT admins and executives.

Three different types of inventory - The solution offers:
1. User inventory, which gives you a comprehensive view of users across all connected SaaS apps. With the user inventory, you can see what SaaS the user is using or is deactivated on, privilege roles, and what security checks the user shows up in.
2. Device inventory so you can correlate the risk of SaaS users and their endpoints. The solution’s device inventory provides visibility into the devices that have access to the company’s SaaS apps and allows you to manage risks based on the device hygiene score.
3. Third-party app access: With Adaptive Shield, you gain visibility into third-party apps that are integrated with your SaaS stack.

Privileged activity monitoring: By implementing Adaptive Shield, you can monitor privileged users and their activities to track user behavior and detect when suspicious activity occurs.

Scoped users: Adaptive Shield offers limited access to the platform so the SaaS app owner, who exists outside of your security team, can have visibility into their owned apps and remediate issues right away, while your security team oversees.

Timeline view: The Adaptive Shield solution provides a timeline view of your SaaS environment so you can detect changes and see how your system’s posture has evolved over time.

Adaptive Shield

Microsoft Entra ID Protection enhances security through features like conditional access and multifactor authentication, optimizing identity management for enterprises. This robust solution ensures efficient control over access policies, supporting seamless integration and operational efficiency.

Microsoft Entra ID Protection provides advanced identity management, authentication, and authorization capabilities, supporting multifactor authentication and single sign-on to control digital identities effectively. It utilizes adaptive machine learning for security enhancements and automated risk-based actions, with seamless Microsoft Defender integration. Connectivity with third-party applications and real-time monitoring offers improved operational efficiency for managing large user bases. While it is a powerful tool, there is room to grow in areas such as identity labeling, password management, faster synchronization, better Mac compatibility, and improved scalability. Desired features include enhanced course availability for security training, streamlined implementation processes, and clarified interfaces.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID Protection?

Conditional Access: Control access policies to secure identity-related activities.
Multifactor Authentication: Strengthen sign-in security with multiple verification methods.
Single Sign-On: Simplify access to applications with a single set of credentials.
Identity Governance: Maintain compliance and manage identities efficiently.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Adaptive machine learning and risk-based actions reduce vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Integration and monitoring capabilities facilitate large-scale management.
Compliance Support: Aids in maintaining security compliance strategies.
Seamless Integration: Works effectively with Microsoft Defender and third-party apps.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Entra ID Protection to manage identities and access across sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology. They integrate hybrid environments, enforcing multifactor authentication and conditional access policies, which enables them to secure digital identities and align with compliance operations. Many synchronize on-premises Active Directory with cloud services, effectively managing users, groups, and licenses.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Huntress and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.