Akamai App and API Protector vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and TransUnion are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TransUnion users who would recommend it.

Akamai App and API Protector

Read 29 Akamai App and API Protector reviews

8,856 Views
4,162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Read 1 Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Akamai App and API Protector

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] and Akamai App and API Protector are both competitors in the digital security landscape. Akamai App and API Protector seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features and comprehensive protection capabilities.

Features: Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] is known for reliable DDoS mitigation, scalability, and robust high-volume attack protection. Akamai App and API Protector provides a comprehensive security suite, API-specific defenses, and protection against a wide range of threats beyond DDoS.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] offers a straightforward deployment process with standard support. Akamai App and API Protector offers a more user-friendly onboarding experience, exemplary support, and a flexible deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] is more cost-effective with lower setup costs, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Akamai App and API Protector demands a higher initial investment but provides considerable returns through its extensive security features. Akamai's broader features offer greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,938 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (24th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (8th), Cloud and Data Center Security (15th)

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Gavin Pinho

Privacy & Risk Management Vice President, Information Security at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Has provided strong protection against evolving threats but still needs support for configuration fine-tuning

The standout features of Akamai App and API Protector are rooted in it being the Web Application Firewall, where all traffic gets scanned, including the implementation of web firewall rules, and after this phase, traffic proceeds through the BMP, which is Bot Management. Akamai App and API Protector exceeds expectations in terms of AI capabilities, and it genuinely combines a plethora of advanced features. The area in which Akamai excels compared to other competitors with a WAF is in threat intelligence, as threats continually evolve, requiring ongoing updates to backend algorithms to effectively capture smart bots, and Akamai's commitment in that regard is backed by an excellent team, while other providers are still catching up.

Read full review

Justin Thomas

Manager Strategic Planning at Endurance International Group

Identifies a request that comes up multiple times, block holds that particular IP, and lets the genuine traffic pass through

Genuine traffic coming in is still getting better. While I understand that it's some sort of algorithm that is written in this scale, that algorithm can be a little bit better because sometimes while we are doing DDoS mitigation, genuine traffic does get blocked. While it is one of the greatest features it can still be improved. I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature is the custom rules feature. This is because many of our customers require a lot of custom rules. Because it's a very customized project for our customers, I think they have the best of everything already."

"Akamai Web Application Protector is a good solution that provides basic web application protection."

"Overall, I am happy with Site Defender because what it's doing, it's doing well."

"The support that we got from their technical team has been fantastic. I have never experienced this level of support from other CDN providers."

"The dashboard is the most interesting feature of the Akamai portal where you can have a detailed analysis of all the attacks that are happening. You can drill down an issue and see exactly what is happening, who are the bad guys attacking your website, and how Akamai is protecting the website. That is the most valuable feature."

"I like that the charges are all based on usage and labor costs. For the time that we spend onboarding almost 252020 FQDN, Akamai charges us only for the traffic usage, but it's only charging us for the labor costs for onboarding."

"It enables us to move faster with new products because we have this layer of protection set up in our infrastructure."

More Akamai App and API Protector pros

"Scalability is awesome, and they have grown two folds or three folds since we started using them, with no concerns even as we protect close to 60,000 hosted sites for business and e-commerce customers."

"In the DDoS it's difficult to validate what is a genuine request from an end user. We've started being able to do that with the logistics that they have set up. With the protection that they have provided, they are able to identify what is valid and what is not valid. We see that a person who is getting DDoS Neustar service is able to block that particular user. However, while they are doing that it doesn't affect other customers on the server."

Cons

"They should allow for multiple security configurations in one account which will enhance the scalability."

"The WAF features definitely have a lot of room for improvement."

"One thing I asked them is to integrate the API discovery product that they have and push that data into Akamai App and API Protector so that we do not have two types of reviews to identify the type of traffic. We already know the APIs that are frequently getting used, so analysis becomes easier. We can integrate both products and use them."

"Akamai needs to focus on quickly responding to risks, even those that may potentially be of zero threat..Maybe some of the documentation is a little confusing. They have a lot of different places where you can go to get information, and some of the information is quite out of date."

"I do not see any area for improvement. Akamai is already maintaining its own databases for the security concerns, vulnerabilities, and attacks that are there. If anything, they should have a solution in the infrastructure security area as well. They should not be only in cloud cybersecurity; they should also be in infrastructure security."

"The pricing could be reduced a bit."

"The effectiveness of Akamai's bot management in reducing unauthorized access is quite good, although it does require a lot of fine-tuning and tweaking, which involves spending ample time with their support teams to tailor the configuration to our applications."

"The custom rules were difficult to use."

More Akamai App and API Protector cons

"I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense."

"Genuine traffic coming in is still getting better because sometimes while we are doing DDoS mitigation, genuine traffic does get blocked."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive, but it is worth the money."

"There is no license at all for Akamai. They are going to charge us only for the usage."

"The product’s price is high."

"The price they are offering is quite reasonable for premium customers, but it's very expensive if you're a small and medium-sized enterprises."

"Akamai Web Application Protector is an expensive product."

"Akamai is very expensive."

"Price-wise, I would say Akamai's pricing is competitive."

"One reason not all people use Akamai is that it is a little bit more expensive than some other providers."

More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?

There are no significant areas for improvement on the WAF side or for Akamai App and API Protector solution; they are comprehensive in their current state.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The main use case for Akamai App and API Protector is serving as the WAF, Web Application Firewall.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai Web Application Protector?

The primary way Akamai App and API Protector helps manage evolving cyber threats is by considering the impact on revenue, with businesses evaluating if Akamai is worth the cost based on potential l...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Shield vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 9% of the time

AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Radware DDoS vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Corero vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors

F5 Silverline Managed Services vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Cloudflare vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector

September 2026

Download Akamai App and API Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

September 2026

Download Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender

Neustar UltraDDoS, UltraDDoS

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?

DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] is an enterprise-level DDoS protection service designed to safeguard online operations by mitigating attack risks. It provides comprehensive security features that ensure continuous online availability.

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] has been valued for its robust ability to protect against distributed denial-of-service attacks. It offers scalability and effective traffic analysis to detect potential threats swiftly. The system can be enhanced by addressing needs for customization and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure. Despite being end-of-life, it set a standard for DDoS protection through proactive monitoring and advanced threat detection technologies.

What are the most important features of Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]?

Advanced Traffic Analysis: Identifies and mitigates threats in real-time.
Scalability: Protects networks of all sizes from large-scale attacks.
Proactive Monitoring: Continuously scans for vulnerabilities and potential threats.

Which benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Downtime: Ensures constant access to services during attacks.
Cost Efficiency: Limits financial losses by maintaining operations.
Enhanced Security: Provides peace of mind with comprehensive threat management.

In industries like finance and e-commerce, Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] was crucial for maintaining transaction integrity and service reliability. It provided peace of mind to businesses by ensuring network stability, allowing them to focus on growth without disruption concerns.

TransUnion

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet

Choxi

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware, Cloudflare, Imperva and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.