Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Arbor DDoS vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] comparison

NETSCOUT and TransUnion are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Additionally, 94% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TransUnion users who would recommend it.
Arbor DDoS
Read 55 Arbor DDoS reviews
  • 5,672 Views
  • 3,354 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Neustar UltraDDoS EOL and Arbor DDoS are products in the DDoS mitigation sector. Arbor DDoS appears to have the upper hand with its advanced feature set, though Neustar's pricing and support make it attractive for budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Neustar UltraDDoS EOL features robust real-time traffic monitoring, automatic threat alerts, and an intuitive user interface designed for simplicity. Arbor DDoS offers more comprehensive threat detection technologies, such as advanced analytics, machine learning integration, and extensive threat intelligence. The technical superiority of Arbor is contrasted with Neustar's focus on ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Neustar UltraDDoS EOL is praised for its straightforward deployment process and accessible customer service, reducing setup complexities for users. Arbor DDoS has a more complex deployment process supported by extensive technical documentation and specialized support, appealing to users with complex requirements. Arbor offers detailed technical guidance, whereas Neustar provides a user-friendly experience.

Pricing and ROI: Neustar UltraDDoS EOL offers competitive pricing, making it cost-effective for smaller scale requirements with a good return on investment. Arbor DDoS has a higher setup cost, justified by long-term ROI through enhanced protection features. The key difference is Neustar's affordability versus Arbor’s premium pricing justified by its advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Arbor DDoS
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (3rd)
Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Hamada Elewa - PeerSpot reviewer
Users have experienced comprehensive protection against DDoS threats while enjoying seamless integration
The most valuable feature of Arbor DDoS is that it is based in most of the ISPs all over the world, and Egyptian ISPs are one of them. If a customer who is getting internet connectivity from one of the ISPs has an Arbor at the end, it will be integrated with the ISP Arbor. It's some sort of closing all the cycle with Arbor DDoS, from the ISP sides and from your side as a customer. Traffic analysis with Arbor DDoS is very good; it is brilliant. They act in a different way compared to others, and the vendor support is very good. The main benefits Arbor DDoS provides to users include stopping DDoS attacks, which is the biggest nightmare for all customers.
Read full review
JT
Identifies a request that comes up multiple times, block holds that particular IP, and lets the genuine traffic pass through
Genuine traffic coming in is still getting better. While I understand that it's some sort of algorithm that is written in this scale, that algorithm can be a little bit better because sometimes while we are doing DDoS mitigation, genuine traffic does get blocked. While it is one of the greatest features it can still be improved. I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Reporting is quite good. There are several pages of reporting on DDoS attacks, and you can find all the details that you need."
"Analytics and its attack mitigation capabilities are valuable features of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is mitigation, which can blackhole the IP."
"It's just one dashboard with mitigation. You decide which mitigation you want and at what threshold to do this or that. Its operation is pretty simple. It's easy."
"The feature I find most valuable is the packet capture, which beautifully shows the communication between the client and the server, identifying potential malicious activity."
"Arbor DDoS's best feature is that we can put the certificates in, and it will look at layer seven and the encrypted traffic and do the required signaling."
"In the GUI, the packet capture is a very good option, as is the option to block an IP address."
"We can reduce the bandwidth to minimize the attack level. If we see more than 2.5 GBs we drop it directly."
More Arbor DDoS pros
"In the DDoS it's difficult to validate what is a genuine request from an end user. We've started being able to do that with the logistics that they have set up. With the protection that they have provided, they are able to identify what is valid and what is not valid. We see that a person who is getting DDoS Neustar service is able to block that particular user. However, while they are doing that it doesn't affect other customers on the server."
 

Cons

"A small improvement could be a better reporting system."
"When it comes to some false positives, we need to tweak the system from time to time. There is room for improvement when it comes to the actual mitigation because of some false positives."
"The solution's shortcomings are related to its documentation, so it's an area that needs to improve."
"Arbor's SSL decryption is confusing and needs external cards to be installed in the devices. This is not the best solution from an architectural point of view for protecting HTTPS and every other protocol that is SSL encrypted."
"On the application layer, they could have a better distributed traffic flow. They could improve that a bit. For network data it is very effective, but the application layer can be improved."
"The solution's IT support needs improvement."
"The solution needs to enhance its features to compete with other tools."
"The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based."
More Arbor DDoS cons
"I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is slightly on the higher side."
"I believe that the price of Arbor DDoS falls under the bracket of medium to high price."
"I'm a technical guy. But I know it's expensive compared to its competitors. After you have the on-premise solution, for your solution to be effective you have to subscribe to an "upper level," so there's another cost. There is also a subscription to cloud services, which is another cost."
"There is room for improvement with the pricing. It is an expensive solution. The issue with the pricing is more the way it is built. Right now we're paying per router, and there's a limitation there. I would like to see bundle-pricing where there is an overall solution cost."
"The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is expensive when compared to other tools."
"Arbor DDoS is quite expensive, but all these solutions are expensive because they deal with confidential information."
"The price is a little high."
"The licensing of a complete Arbor solution, including fire-walling and unified site management, can get expensive."
More Arbor DDoS pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.
See all answers
Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
See all answers
What do you like most about Arbor DDoS?
The quality of the technical support provided by Arbor DDoS is premium.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS Logo
Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS
Compared 22% of the time
Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS Logo
Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS
Compared 16% of the time
Corero vs Arbor DDoS Logo
Corero vs Arbor DDoS
Compared 8% of the time
A10 Thunder TPS vs Arbor DDoS Logo
A10 Thunder TPS vs Arbor DDoS
Compared 6% of the time
Imperva DDoS vs Arbor DDoS Logo
Imperva DDoS vs Arbor DDoS
Compared 6% of the time
More Arbor DDoS Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Arbor DDoS
June 2025
Arbor DDoS reportDownload Arbor DDoS product report
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
June 2025
Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] reportDownload Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT
Neustar UltraDDoS, UltraDDoS
 

Overview

Arbor DDoS provides effective mitigation against DDoS attacks with a user-friendly interface, integrating cloud and on-premise solutions for real-time traffic control and reporting. It supports large traffic volumes without latency, making it ideal for protecting online infrastructure.

Known for its intuitive GUI and rapid response, Arbor DDoS defends against complex DDoS threats using AI-driven anomaly detection and traffic categorization. It offers packet capture, robust reporting, and deployment flexibility, helping users maintain network stability and performance. While improvements in auto-mitigation, interface modernization, and scalability are needed, its hybrid protection approach efficiently secures networks for service providers and enterprises.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?
  • User-friendly GUI: Simplifies DDoS attack monitoring and management.
  • Real-time traffic visualization: Allows continuous analysis of network traffic.
  • BGP support: Facilitates secure routing for network infrastructure.
  • AI-driven anomaly detection: Identifies unusual traffic patterns promptly.
  • Automated threat response: Executes fast mitigation strategies.
  • Hybrid protection: Combines cloud and on-premise defenses.
Which benefits and ROI should users consider?
  • Effective DDoS mitigation: Enhances network uptime and resilience.
  • Large traffic processing: Handles high volumes without latency.
  • Flexible deployment: Adapts to different operational environments.
  • Comprehensive reporting: Provides insights into network security status.
  • Scalability: Supports growth in network demand and complexity.

Internet Service Providers and managed service providers utilize Arbor DDoS to secure network infrastructure and service availability. It's implemented in government and finance sectors for safeguarding customer websites and managing server traffic thresholds. Organizations deploy Arbor DDoS both on-premise and via cloud for extensive network protection.

NETSCOUT

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] is an enterprise-level DDoS protection service designed to safeguard online operations by mitigating attack risks. It provides comprehensive security features that ensure continuous online availability.

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] has been valued for its robust ability to protect against distributed denial-of-service attacks. It offers scalability and effective traffic analysis to detect potential threats swiftly. The system can be enhanced by addressing needs for customization and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure. Despite being end-of-life, it set a standard for DDoS protection through proactive monitoring and advanced threat detection technologies.

What are the most important features of Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]?
  • Advanced Traffic Analysis: Identifies and mitigates threats in real-time.
  • Scalability: Protects networks of all sizes from large-scale attacks.
  • Proactive Monitoring: Continuously scans for vulnerabilities and potential threats.
Which benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
  • Reduced Downtime: Ensures constant access to services during attacks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Limits financial losses by maintaining operations.
  • Enhanced Security: Provides peace of mind with comprehensive threat management.

In industries like finance and e-commerce, Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] was crucial for maintaining transaction integrity and service reliability. It provided peace of mind to businesses by ensuring network stability, allowing them to focus on growth without disruption concerns.

TransUnion
 

Sample Customers

Xtel Communications
Choxi
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Radware, NETSCOUT and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.