Google Firebase and Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) compete in the cloud services industry, each catering to unique user needs. Google Firebase is particularly favorable for app developers due to its comprehensive backend services, while Akamai Connected Cloud appeals more to those looking for straightforward cloud infrastructure solutions.
Features: Google Firebase offers Realtime Database, easy authentication for web and mobile apps, and integrated real-time notifications. It highlights strong cloud capabilities and user-friendly interfaces, making it ideal for developers seeking a ready-to-use backend service. Akamai Connected Cloud provides robust virtual servers known for reliable uptime and performance, focusing on fast deployment and a simple interface suited for those familiar with Linux and command-line environments.
Room for Improvement: Google Firebase can improve by enhancing function control, expanding real-time features, and offering better logging and complex query capabilities. Additionally, its price estimation could be refined. Akamai Connected Cloud would benefit from increasing its data center locations, particularly in Europe, offering role-based access controls, and providing managed databases and better support for less technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Firebase is praised for its extensive documentation, which streamlines deployment, but its complexity can be challenging for less experienced users. Akamai Connected Cloud's straightforward setup with responsive support is advantageous for users who prefer simplicity and direct assistance. Both platforms have good documentation, but Firebase's community resources offer extensive support, while Linode provides a more streamlined experience with immediate support.
Pricing and ROI: Google Firebase employs a flexible pricing model, beginning with a generous free tier that can become costly as usage scales. Its pay-as-you-go options appeal to startups needing low initial costs. Akamai Connected Cloud features a simple, predictable pricing structure, making it ideal for users focused on stable budget planning. Linode maintains consistent pricing, offering value and predictability, which can be cost-effective for long-term use.
They were very responsive to my issue.
They respond with relevant and easy-to-follow solutions.
I do not currently find any other competitors that match its offering.
If the community doesn't have the answers, then I contact the Google Firebase team directly.
For my usage, which is a small business, I rate the scalability of Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) around nine or ten.
It can handle all tiers of the market effectively.
Google also has some other cloud services, but when we compare Google Firebase, it is not as scalable.
I would rate the scalability of Google Firebase as eight because I miss some features from MS SQL, particularly the SQL functions.
In our company, we have prototypes on Google Firebase and productions on AWS Cloud.
The main improvement I would like to see from Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is the ability to duplicate the server as it is and initialize a new one with the same features.
The main area for improvement is the lack of a backup feature to the local hard disk or storage.
It would be useful to have the option to sort or group by tags on the domains page.
Since Google Firebase is a NoSQL platform, areas for improvement include enhancing query functionalities to be more equivalent to SQL, like MS SQL.
Automation testing with mobile devices could be improved, especially in regression testing to ensure that new feature launches do not affect other features.
I find Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode)'s pricing very competitive.
They could have implemented credits based on usage so that users would be able to easily calculate the pricing and provide it to customers.
Google Firebase offers a reasonable pricing structure.
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is easy to use and has a fair price, making it accessible and straightforward, which is crucial when compared to other complex solutions.
Their support is really good. I can ask anything at any time, and they are able to resolve issues like reinstating deleted Linodes.
I use the backup features as my main benefit from Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode), and since my business is small, I don't need more than this.
What I appreciate most about Google Firebase is the speed, accuracy, and security it offers.
Serverless cloud functions.
These features are invaluable for mobile development and ensuring smooth internal operations.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) | 6.3% |
| Google Firebase | 4.4% |
| Other | 89.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Linode Pricing Page
CPU, transfer, storage, and RAM bundled into one simple price.
Google Firebase is a stable, reliable, and scalable mobile platform that enables you to quickly develop apps, accelerate them, and monitor their performance.
With Google Firebase You Can
Google Firebase Features:
SDKs supported by Google Firebase:
Benefits of Google Firebase:
Reviews from Real Users
PeerSpot user Nilakshi S., technical team lead at AuthentiCode says, “The solution is very stable and very reliable. There aren't any bugs or glitches.”
"What I like most about Google Firebase is that it's one of the easier options to host a website or app quickly," says Craig F., application development manager at a financial services firm.
A senior developer at a consultancy says, “The documentation for Google Firebase is great. Also, what I like about it is the integration to Android, which is the reason I went with Firebase.”
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
