Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Nutanix Flow Network Security comparison

Akamai and Nutanix are both solutions in the Microsegmentation Software category. Akamai is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7, while Nutanix is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Akamai holds a 19.0% mindshare in MS, compared to Nutanix’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Read 26 Akamai Guardicore Segmentation reviews

9,041 Views
5,153 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Read 11 Nutanix Flow Network Security reviews

2,051 Views
1,928 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Nutanix Flow Network Security both focus on network security with different methods. Akamai holds an edge in micro-segmentation and visibility, while Nutanix excels in user-friendly virtual networking.

Features: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation specializes in micro-segmentation, fast policy application, and high visibility. It integrates well with different network settings and supports a wide array of operating systems. Nutanix Flow Network Security is known for its simple deployment and management, quality APIs, and solid micro-segmentation in a virtual framework.

Room for Improvement: Akamai users call for lower licensing costs and better integration with additional tools, plus more flexible dashboards and improved automation. Nutanix Flow could enhance networking features and disaster recovery integration. Both need advancements in customization and management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation supports diverse environments including public and hybrid clouds and is praised for excellent technical support. Nutanix Flow offers consistency, mainly for on-premises and public clouds, but needs to improve its support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai Guardicore is seen as expensive but offers protective features that clients value positively in terms of ROI. Nutanix Flow is competitively priced with clear subscription plans, though more pricing tiers for various customer sizes are desired. Akamai shows significant ROI with data protection and lower resource demands, while Nutanix offers affordability without missing crucial features.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,563 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud and Data Center Security (1st), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (12th), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (6th)

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Microsegmentation Software category, the mindshare of Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is 19.0%, down from 27.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Flow Network Security is 6.8%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Microsegmentation Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation	19.0%
Nutanix Flow Network Security	6.8%
Other	74.2%

Microsegmentation Software

Featured Reviews

Vibin Thomas

Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems

Zero-trust micro-segmentation has strengthened security and improves east-west traffic visibility

While Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a very powerful solution, there are a few areas where it could be improved. One of the main challenges is the initial deployment and policy design complexity. In large environments, understanding all application dependencies and creating the right policies can take time and requires close coordination with application teams. The user interface and policy management can also be improved. As the number of policies grows, managing and organizing them becomes slightly complex. A more simplified or intuitive policy structure would help operational teams. Another area is integration with other security tools such as SIEM or SOAR platforms. While integration is possible, making it more seamless and easier to configure would add value. Additionally, the reporting and dashboard could be enhanced to provide more customizable and business-level insights, especially for management and reporting. One small improvement I would suggest for Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is having more automation capabilities for policy creation and recommendation. For example, AI-driven suggestions based on observed traffic patterns would help reduce manual effort during the initial policy design. It would also help to have more predefined templates for common use cases, especially for industries such as banking, to speed up deployment. Another area is enhanced reporting customization where we can easily generate business-level dashboards for management and compliance teams without any additional effort.

Read full review

Vishnu Mohan

Service Delivery Manager Cloud And Datacenter Operations at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud-style segmentation has improved hybrid security but integration with on-prem tags still needs work

I would like to see better micro-segmentation capabilities in Nutanix Flow Network Security. It has to work with our Cisco on-premises tooling. We use something called tagging on-premises, so if the same tags could be used in Nutanix Flow Network Security, then that would make life easier. The Cisco part was a challenge in terms of how it integrates with third-party vendors and tools, so we have kept it for the next release.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are the maps and ring fencing that help monitor events."

"The technical support has been excellent, and is probably one of the best customer services provided by any company, as they are helpful, reactive to problems, and constantly work to enable us to do what we want to do."

"No one has asked for more, so I find the technical support in my region is pretty good."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility of processes and connections."

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has impacted my organization positively because we find it difficult to remove the legacy systems, so it was very important to segment them from the rest of the network to protect them and protect the rest of our network."

"We like the centralized management of the firewalls. Until we installed Guardicore Centra, we managed all our firewalls individually, so making changes was complicated, difficult, and time-consuming."

"Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems."

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is the tool that makes me sleeping well every day."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pros

"We appreciate the fact that this solution allows us to segregate two virtual machines that are in the same cluster."

"It allows for policies that enable complete visibility and traffic control."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The micro-segmentation feature helps to manage network security effectively because it helps the virtual machines that are already on the cluster and the applications inside the cluster itself, protects them and helps them communicate with each other without needing a complex external or internal firewall in this use case."

"When comparing the costs of Nutanix Flow versus managing multiple VLANs and many other firewalls, it is far less expensive."

"Flow Network Security's most valuable features are user-friendliness, the console, and policy creation."

"What I like about Nutanix Flow Network Security is that it features cloud-like segmentation, which is available in a hybrid environment for us."

"Nutanix Flow Network Security is a simple solution that is usable, easy to understand, and easy to deploy."

More Nutanix Flow Network Security pros

Cons

"Guardicore Centra should incorporate automation so that we don't require to write custom scripts and APIs. The tool also has limitations on rules where it allows only sixty thousand rules. Our clients have also commented that there are too many manual clicks and effort to do changes. I think that the incorporation of automation can help our clients make changes with confidence and without the possibility of human error."

"To become more competitive, I believe they have to work on technology knowledge and address the brand awareness issues for my market."

"I think the pricing is very high."

"They can maybe improve their customer service just because they are kind of a small organization, and customer service isn't as big as others such as VMware."

"The integration with other tools could be improved."

"The maps could go a bit faster. They are useful but slightly slow."

"The customer service rating I would give is a four out of ten."

"It would be very helpful for beginners if the solution had more windows to help with the terms inside instead of going to the documentation."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation cons

"I would like to see better micro-segmentation capabilities in Nutanix Flow Network Security."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"We would like the reporting functionality of this solution to be improved."

"While the graphical interface of Nutanix Flow Network Security could have been improved, and some of the reporting features needed extra work, the product's features were similar to VMware's NSX. The difference lay more in the presentation and user interface."

"Nutanix Flow Network Security needs to improve threat hunting, compliance, and policy optimization - these things that security officers would use."

"For customers who are running Nutanix Flow and AHV, the largest area for improvement is in the disaster recovery environments. To automate the populate of rules from one side to the other side in case of disaster you report everything on the disaster recovery site, and you have all the rules automatically applied. This was something that was being built when I left Nutanix. It might already be available. Additionally, the usability of the rules editor could improve."

"The most difficult part is the configuration of the initial blueprints."

"Last time I used it, it was not handy to see or to analyze traffic logs."

More Nutanix Flow Network Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is too high."

"This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you."

"Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."

"The solution is reasonably priced and I would rate it a six out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive."

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is expensive."

"The customer would complain about the cost."

"The price is the same as other products in the market. There's no price argument to choose one or the other product, it will cost the customer approximately the same."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual subscription to use this solution. There is a 60-day trial to use the solution, it gives you time to decide if you want to continue using the solution."

"Flow Network Security is available on a three-year license, with annual renewals of the maintenance fee."

"The product is available for free use."

"In comparison to other options available in the market, I would rate their pricing as very competitive, probably a two or three out of ten for cost."

"There are different licensing models."

"This model is very accessible to implement."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsegmentation Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Healthcare Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Guardicore Centra?

Regarding pricing and setup cost, I don't have information because I am from a consulting team and not from the sales team. The licensing is related to the number of assets that the customer has in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Guardicore Infection Monkey?

Reporting is one area where I think Akamai Guardicore Segmentation can be improved. They are working on it, but as of now, that is the aspect that needs enhancement. Nothing specific comes to mind ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Guardicore Infection Monkey?

My main use case for Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is related to Kubernetes instrumentation and visibility, although it is difficult to specify a main use case. When I work with Kubernetes, it is ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Flow?

There are different models like Nutanix AOS Pro or Ultimate license. The prices are different, but it's not in the same price range as Cisco ACI, for example.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Flow?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Flow?

I cannot think of any weak sides, drawbacks, or something to improve. We have not implemented the impact on Nutanix Flow Network Security's zero-trust security model on our threat control processes...

See all answers

Comparisons

Illumio Segmentation vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 24% of the time

Cisco Secure Workload vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 10% of the time

VMware NSX vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 8% of the time

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 6% of the time

TrendAI Deep Security vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 5% of the time

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Competitors

VMware NSX vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 53% of the time

Illumio Segmentation vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Secure Workload vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 9% of the time

Hillstone CloudHive vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 6% of the time

ShieldX vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Nutanix Flow Network Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

August 2026

Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Flow Network Security

July 2026

Download Nutanix Flow Network Security product report

Also Known As

Guardicore Centra, GuardiCore

Nutanix Flow Microsegmentation

Overview

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation offers extensive visibility and micro-segmentation capabilities, integrating seamlessly with diverse environments to enhance security measures. Organizations benefit from its platform agnosticism and centralized firewall management, maximizing protection and operational efficiency.

Known for its detailed network visibility, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation streamlines security operations across different platforms. It facilitates ease of policy creation and allows for effective segmentation, even of legacy systems. With advanced threat intelligence and real-time traffic monitoring, organizations optimize security and compliance, reducing attack surfaces through precise process and port control. This capability extends to seamless operation in environments like Kubernetes and data centers, implementing Zero Trust security models and server-to-server segmentation.

What are the key features?

Extensive visibility: Offers comprehensive insight across network environments.
Platform agnosticism: Operates effectively on multiple platforms.
Micro-segmentation: Enables detailed control over network traffic.
Centralized management: Simplifies firewall administration and monitoring.
Threat intelligence: Incorporates AI for dynamic threat assessment.

What benefits or ROI should organizations seek?

Enhanced security: Reduces attack surfaces and prevents lateral movements.
Operational efficiency: Streamlines policy creation and enforcement.
Integration flexibility: Aligns with diverse systems for seamless deployment.
Compliance achievement: Supports adherence to industry standards.

In sectors like banking and financial services, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is crucial for implementing Zero Trust models and enhancing server-to-server segmentation. These industries utilize its capabilities to replace traditional firewalls and manage complex environments, boosting security through application dependency mapping and optimized east-west traffic control.

Akamai

Nutanix Flow Network Security offers advanced network protection through virtual networking and micro-segmentation, supporting zero-trust principles for secure communication among virtual machines and applications while being compatible with Nutanix solutions.

Featuring an intuitive console, Nutanix Flow Network Security simplifies operations and enhances visibility. It integrates with Nutanix solutions, facilitating seamless compatibility. The inclusion of virtual networking and micro-segmentation aids in data management by improving network visualization and virtual machine segregation. Supporting zero-trust principles, the security system efficiently manages isolated communication and secure deployment. With robust connectivity through fiber links and VPCs, it ensures reliable performance across networks, making it accessible to businesses with diverse requirements.

What are the key features of Nutanix Flow Network Security?

Virtual Networking: Provides seamless integration for secure data transmission.
Micro-Segmentation: Enhances security by segmenting traffic within networks.
API Control: Allows streamlined management of network operations through APIs.
Network Performance Analysis: Offers insights into network health and efficiency.
User-Friendly Console: Simplifies policy creation and improves network visibility.

What benefits can be expected when evaluating Nutanix Flow Network Security?

Enhanced Security: Facilitates zero-trust policies and isolated VM communication.
Improved Data Management: Aids in the segregation and visualization of virtual machines.
Operational Efficiency: Simplifies complex networking tasks for faster deployment.
Compatibility: Integrates smoothly with Nutanix solutions, enhancing overall functionality.
Connectivity: Ensures secure and reliable connectivity with fiber links and VPCs.

In industries such as IT and financial services, Nutanix Flow Network Security is commonly used for disaster recovery planning and enhancing micro-segmentation. It ensures secure, isolated communication within virtual environments and helps manage traffic visibility. By facilitating the creation of non-routed virtual private clouds and blocking unauthorized access between VMs, organizations leverage its capabilities for better network communication control across data centers.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, Volkswagen SAIC, Brighton and Hove City Council, Foresters Financial, Janus International Group, Cloud Comrade, Serco

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

June 2026

Free Report: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security report.

See our list of best Microsegmentation Software vendors.

We monitor all Microsegmentation Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.