Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon comparison

Software AG and BiZZdesign are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Software AG is ranked #16, while BiZZdesign is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Software AG holds a 2.6% mindshare in AM, compared to BiZZdesign’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of BiZZdesign users who would recommend it.

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Read 3 Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management reviews

800 Views
800 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Read 19 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews

3,019 Views
1,993 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management and BiZZdesign HoriZZon are enterprise architecture solutions. Alfabet leads with cost-effectiveness and customer support, while BiZZdesign HoriZZon dominates with its advanced features, offering more overall value.

Features: Alfabet offers comprehensive portfolio management, strategic planning capabilities, and efficient features for cost-sensitive environments. BiZZdesign HoriZZon focuses on collaboration with stakeholders, advanced analytics, and seamless integration, providing superior strategic insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alfabet provides a flexible deployment model and strong customer support, simplifying the deployment process. BiZZdesign HoriZZon emphasizes continuous support and user training, ensuring ongoing engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Alfabet is known for its competitive pricing, aligning well with customer budgets and showcasing impressive ROI. BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers superior ROI despite higher upfront costs, due to its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is 2.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 5.2%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BiZZdesign HoriZZon	5.2%
Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management	2.6%
Other	92.2%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

AlanJackson

Partner: Enterprise Strategy & Advisory at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Great taxonomy support but raw business processing should be upgraded

Alfabet is not just a technology tool, it's also a business tool. And if a decision's made without the business involved, then Alfabet will not be in a position to deliver anything more than support for enterprise architect drawings and solutions drawings. It has to be the business. If you do that, it works well. If you don't and I've had the experience where they haven't evolved a business, then it just becomes a tech tool that the business doesn't care about. The stigma of having an environment that was so delayed in the maintenance caused lots of finger-pointing within the organization of who was right and who was wrong. It took a considerable period of time to move people past that point to actually look at it as a business tool supported by the technology team. I rate the solution seven out of 10.

Read full review

Maamoun Hasuneh

Chief Enterprise Architect at EVC

Architecture repository has strengthened data‑driven decisions and supported risk‑aware planning

BiZZdesign HoriZZon needs to publish its integration scenarios and integration points with other digital transformation tools such as IT service management, risk management, asset management, customer service, and ERP. The company should first build the scenario and define its integration points in business and technology to make customers more confident about having a complete solution. Currently, there is a challenge with the company to offer transparent and documented integration. They offer five integration points at a fixed price, but other things come at additional costs. However, specific information about what those additional items are, what the scenarios entail, what the schemas are, what the workflows include, and what the application integration involves is not provided. The learning portal does not include integration documentation at a high level or in detail. The portal does have comprehensive resources explaining how to make their website, how to create dashboards, and how to publish EA content, which are clear. The high-end tool on the laptop is also explained in detail, covering elements, relations, and everything as standard.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of this solution are its customizability, and flexibility in the configuration."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It takes two to three days to set up the environment. One person was able to handle the implementation."

"The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature."

"The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable."

"It is very easy to use. I can just click on an application component and find out if we are using this particular component. This provides us flexibility."

"I used BiZZdesign HoriZZon at two organizations. At Manchester Metropolitan University, I used it with a small team for architectural modeling of the student record system. We modeled teams, process objects, and their interactions with applications. We also used it to model a gradual rollout with plateaus showing migration over time. At the BBC, I used it to model software services for publishing content online. I showed key model views to senior stakeholders using Horizon, allowing them to modify and score applications and services."

"The initial setup of this solution was very straightforward."

"The most valuable features of BiZZdesign HoriZZon include the diagrammatic representation of BPMN models, which I find good for modeling, and things such as capability maps."

"Among the valuable features is the ability to document standards. For example, we have mandatory operating standards that need to be followed by every application and every architecture. We use things like table charts and pie charts for documenting the costs incurred across the systems. All of these are good features."

"The most valuable feature is that it allows you to work with different methods, using the same tool."

"This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

Cons

"The user experience, the layout and the different technologies behind the presentations are a bit old. These need to be updated. They should focus on web development. It's simply not supporting the current user experience guidelines."

"We would like to see the visualization of assets, as well as artificial intelligence techniques to assist us in making our decisions."

"The product is not great at implementing security frameworks across an end-to-end supply chain."

"I have seen table charts where, if the chart is a little too big, it does not fit in HoriZZon and it is not at all visible... There have been several times where we could not publish a chart properly and we had to break the chart into small tables and create multiple artifacts, creating a complete mess. This should be seriously taken up by BiZZdesign because there is a lot of scope for improvement in terms of usability. It's not at all good, unfortunately."

"The repository of duplicate objects is bad."

"One area where BiZZdesign HoriZZon could use some improvement is in its REST APIs."

"Integration definitely needs improvement. There are some restrictions. We've seen that it doesn't integrate with everything we might expect."

"There could be simpler modelling."

"Scalability is a bit of a problem for BiZZdesign. There is always a possibility it will failover."

"The users of BiZZdesign should be able to enter their data or make modeling changes via HoriZZon."

"It lacks capabilities with regard to infrastructure modeling."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"The price is reasonable."

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

BiZZdesign HoriZZon is primarily used as a repository for Enterprise Architecture and is also utilized in broad portfolio management including project management and other applications, but the mai...

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 27% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 10% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 9% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 9% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 8% of the time

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Competitors

iServer vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 13% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 12% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 8% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 6% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

February 2026

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management report

Download Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management product report

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

February 2026

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

Also Known As

No data available

HoriZZon

Overview

Software AG's Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Platform provides a collaborative platform for aligning the IT landscape with the business to guide competitive transformation. You can describe complex IT systems in terms of their business, application, information and technical layers, and develop standards for change. Build the foundation for business-IT transformation with an accurate, real-time picture of the IT landscape, including all applications and technologies, the inter-relationships between them, the information they exchange as well as the business organizations and processes they support.

Software AG

Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

Core Platform Capabilities:

Multi-discipline collaboration
Data Integration
Advanced analytics
Models and Roadmaps
Governance & Security
Business Insight Graph

BiZZdesign

Sample Customers

Metro Bank, Credit Suisse

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

February 2026

Free Report: Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Find out what your peers are saying about Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.