Alluvio AppResponse vs Azure Monitor comparison

Riverbed and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7. Riverbed holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Microsoft’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Alluvio AppResponse

Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews

2,029 Views
933 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Read 56 Azure Monitor reviews

10,084 Views
8,975 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Alluvio AppResponse

Azure Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Azure Monitor are enterprise-grade monitoring tools competing in the network and systems monitoring category. Azure Monitor has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set though Alluvio AppResponse is favored for deployment and customer service.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse offers deep packet inspection, effective network behavior analysis, and powerful troubleshooting tools. Azure Monitor provides extensive integration capabilities, robust analytics, and a detailed and flexible alerting system.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse could benefit from a more intuitive setup, enhanced reporting, and greater ease of use. Azure Monitor needs improvements in its log search functionalities, streamlined alert configuration process, and reduced complexity for new users.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse is easier to deploy with supportive customer service. Azure Monitor offers extensive documentation but involves a more complex setup process, making Alluvio AppResponse preferred for deployment and customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse users report a higher initial setup cost but recognize value through its specific features' ROI. Azure Monitor is generally more expensive on a subscription basis but delivers high ROI via integrated services and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

47th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (55th)

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 3.1%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Monitor	3.1%
Alluvio AppResponse	0.5%
Other	96.4%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Satyam Kumar

Senior Technical Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Identifies and analyzes performance issues quickly using in-built AI and ML

With Alluvio AppResponse, there is an in-built analytical analysis with AI and ML, which identifies and provides data such as the number of TCP retransmits, web access time, total connection time out, total connections established, and server-side errors. The RTCC response time composition chart is crucial because it helps pinpoint the issue's origin, whether from the server, network, or application side. It's a superb product when compared to SolarWinds SAM, which is agent-based, while Alluvio AppResponse captures all traffic from the core switch.

Read full review

Andy Rabern

Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Telemetry insights have improved how I track user behavior and application performance daily

I feel Azure Monitor does a fair job. I do feel it is not a streaming service in my opinion. There are advantages to having stream messaging and logging on that level. But for what it is, I feel it does well. My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry. I believe Azure Monitor does pretty much the same thing. I have also used tools such as New Relic, and New Relic is a much more robust tool, but that is a different product and you are going to pay for that. It is a different offering altogether. The subscription that we had at the time allowed for a couple gigabytes of telemetry during the month, and I believe that telemetry only lives for about two months. You have to experiment with it to see how much you want to pay. I was not really involved in the pricing. It was more along the lines of we were running up against our limits in terms of the amount of free telemetry or telemetry that we get with our subscription, and so we either needed to scale back or turn specific telemetry types off or do some more sampling. It is nice that those capabilities are there so that you can reduce the amount of telemetry. I cannot really speak to pricing but I do believe that it is somewhat reasonable for Azure Monitor. New Relic is pretty expensive, I believe.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."

"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."

"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."

"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"

"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."

"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."

"We really like the scalability capabilities."

"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."

More Alluvio AppResponse pros

"We like this searchability and availability of the data."

"It is a robust, stable product."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ease of use and support for multiple environments"

"Provides an overview and high-level information."

"One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation."

"The features that are most valuable are the alerting function and also the logging functionality to analyze certain issues using log analytics"

"Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Azure Monitor pros

Cons

"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."

"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."

"Technical support needs to be more responsive."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."

"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."

More Alluvio AppResponse cons

"No improvements are needed from my perspective."

"They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."

"Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy."

"They need to work with other cloud providers - not just Azure."

"There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier."

"The solution's monitoring feature has limitations for analyzing multiple metrics."

"The biggest one is probably just the user interface. There could be more advanced logging at the database level. They can also improve their query builder to allow you to search for things better, but I last used it about a year ago. They might have already changed a ton of things in the newer versions."

"The solution needs better monitoring. It requires better log controls."

More Azure Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."

"Regarding pricing, Azure Monitor is free with Azure license, so there are no additional costs for using it."

"The tool's pricing is very good. I could say that Microsoft offers different cost models, which are listed on the product's website."

"Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."

"There is a monthly fee for the alerts triggered and the data stored."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

"The solution’s pricing depends on how much logs it collects."

"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."

"Azure Monitor is cheaper compared to other third-party monitoring tools."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

We are the partner of Riverbed. Once any customer buys the Riverbed product, we deploy and configure it to meet their use cases. Alluvio AppResponse can identify if a page or an application is slow...

See all answers

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

See all answers

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 5% of the time

More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download Alluvio AppResponse product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

February 2026

Download Azure Monitor product report

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert

No data available

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor

February 2026

Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.