Alluvio AppResponse vs Azure Monitor comparison

Riverbed and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #48 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Riverbed holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Microsoft’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Alluvio AppResponse

Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews

473 Views
197 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

12,584 Views
8,015 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Alluvio AppResponse

Azure Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Azure Monitor are enterprise-grade monitoring tools competing in the network and systems monitoring category. Azure Monitor has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set though Alluvio AppResponse is favored for deployment and customer service.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse offers deep packet inspection, effective network behavior analysis, and powerful troubleshooting tools. Azure Monitor provides extensive integration capabilities, robust analytics, and a detailed and flexible alerting system.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse could benefit from a more intuitive setup, enhanced reporting, and greater ease of use. Azure Monitor needs improvements in its log search functionalities, streamlined alert configuration process, and reduced complexity for new users.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse is easier to deploy with supportive customer service. Azure Monitor offers extensive documentation but involves a more complex setup process, making Alluvio AppResponse preferred for deployment and customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse users report a higher initial setup cost but recognize value through its specific features' ROI. Azure Monitor is generally more expensive on a subscription basis but delivers high ROI via integrated services and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

48th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (59th)

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.3%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic

Network and Security Unit Manager at Bankalararası Kart Merkezi (BKM)

It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels

I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.

Read full review

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."

"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."

"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."

"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"

"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."

"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."

"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."

"Riverbed's product is a superb product."

More Alluvio AppResponse pros

"We like this searchability and availability of the data."

"The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate."

"I use the solution to monitor the infrastructure and applications."

"Technical support is helpful."

"It allows you to set thresholds on the metrics and receive alerts."

"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."

"It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale."

"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs."

More Azure Monitor pros

Cons

"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."

"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."

"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."

"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."

"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."

"Technical support needs to be more responsive."

"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

More Alluvio AppResponse cons

"It's really complex to retrieve or query the logs in Azure Monitor."

"They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration."

"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."

"When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible."

"Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy."

"As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement."

"There is room for improvement in stability."

"Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful."

More Azure Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."

"Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects."

"The product offers a pay-as-you-go model to users. The charges are to be paid according to the usage of the product."

"Regarding pricing, Azure Monitor is free with Azure license, so there are no additional costs for using it."

"Azure Monitor's price is minimal to the point of being almost negligible."

"Azure Monitor is cheaper compared to other third-party monitoring tools."

"There is a monthly fee for the alerts triggered and the data stored."

"The tool is expensive."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...

See all answers

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 21% of the time

Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 17% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 16% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 15% of the time

More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

Download Alluvio AppResponse product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

June 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert

No data available

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor

June 2025

Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.