Amazon Aurora vs CockroachDB comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cockroach are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Cockroach is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.9% mindshare in SQL, compared to Cockroach’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Cockroach users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 18 Amazon Aurora reviews

2,181 Views
1,427 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

2,237 Views
1,138 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

CockroachDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

CockroachDB and Amazon Aurora are competitors in the cloud-based database management market. CockroachDB excels in distributed systems with its adaptable architecture, while Amazon Aurora shines with seamless AWS integration and strong multi-region deployment capabilities.

Features: CockroachDB offers high fault-tolerance, simple installation, and a distributed nature which allows geo-partitioning for enhanced data residency control, speed, and resiliency. Key features also include node syncing and automatic rebalancing. Amazon Aurora is noted for its robust scalability, auto-scaling, SQL standardization, and seamless AWS integration. It supports multi-region clusters, provides distinct endpoints for read and write operations, and offers continuous backups.

Room for Improvement: CockroachDB can enhance disaster recovery and failover features, improve PostgreSQL compatibility, and clarify serverless offerings. Its pricing and initial setup could also be more user-friendly. Amazon Aurora faces criticism for costliness. Enhancements in cryptography, standalone solutions, query performance insights, and integration with Oracle are needed. Predictability in update release patterns could improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CockroachDB supports both public and on-premises deployments, offering more flexibility for on-premise setups despite mixed reviews on technical support. Amazon Aurora operates primarily on cloud platforms supported by AWS infrastructure, excelling in AWS integration but requiring customer service improvements.

Pricing and ROI: CockroachDB's open-source cost model is seen as affordable, offering flexibility with a good return on investment, although some premium offerings are seen as costly. Amazon Aurora's managed service benefits reflect in its pricing, providing cost-effectiveness due to performance and AWS features, but price fluctuations based on usage and performance suggest potential for cost optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. CockroachDB Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. CockroachDB

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 2.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CockroachDB is 4.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Adnan Shafiq

Associate Vice President - Database Management (Principal Solutions Architect) at Northbay

High availability and geographical redundancy ensure reliable performance and cost efficiency

Amazon Aurora ( /products/amazon-aurora-reviews ) provides up to fifteen to sixteen read replicas. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring high availability and geographical redundancy, which can be considered a GR instead of a DR. As a managed service, maintenance tasks like backup and restore are handled by AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ), saving my organization significant time and money. Additionally, its fast cloning feature allows us to create a new clone from a large database swiftly, similar to a zero-copy cloning feature in Snowflake ( /products/snowflake-reviews ). This makes Amazon Aurora a compelling choice for my organization.

Read full review

Dang Quy Tai

Student at Univerzita obrany

Geo-replication benefits with distributed setup and a helpful AI support chatbot

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for our applications. Currently, I am using PostgreSQL, however, I want to try some distributed databases…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Amazon Aurora include the global instance with the global writer endpoint, which allows failovers and instance switches without requiring changes in my code, thanks to the default global Route 53 endpoint."

"Aurora's features that I find the most beneficial include its database backup strategy, performance options, and input-output operations."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively."

"The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature."

"Amazon Aurora stands out for its ease of use in a managed environment, inbuilt security, continuous backups, numerous read replicas, multi-region automated replication, and seamless integration with other AWS services."

"The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy."

"Amazon Aurora is built on community databases and AWS has added additional features to it, allowing customers to have enterprise-level features at a lower cost."

"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"What I like best is its ability to solve data residency issues. The main advantage is auto geo partitioning, built into the product. This means we don't have to spin up separate servers in each region, which would be much more costly."

"CockroachDB is highly reliable."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

More CockroachDB pros

Cons

"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."

"There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired."

"Room for improvement might be in the UI, integrations, or data working capabilities for better user experience."

"Amazon Aurora should upgrade its base PostgreSQL versions more frequently and offer all PostgreSQL extensions."

"In Oracle, tools like Veridata allow for comparing databases and certifying data accuracy, even offering repair capabilities, which are missing in Aurora. There should be a similar comparison tool in Aurora."

"I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues."

"A challenge I noticed is during migration from PostgreSQL RDS to Amazon Aurora. There are technical challenges, such as the inability to provision the database using a PostgreSQL snapshot directly."

"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"The platform could be more extensible."

More CockroachDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"It is quite expensive."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

36%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora is not very expensive as other solutions with similar features from other vendors come at almost the same cost. I rated it as two to three on a scale where ten is very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora should upgrade its base PostgreSQL ( /products/postgresql-reviews ) versions more frequently and offer all PostgreSQL extensions. Keeping extensions up-to-date with PostgreSQL release...

See all answers

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 28% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 19% of the time

Citus Data vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 26% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 15% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

SurrealDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 3% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

June 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

June 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. CockroachDB

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. CockroachDB

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. CockroachDB and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. CockroachDB report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.