Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.7% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 20 Amazon Aurora reviews

1,648 Views
1,615 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Read 13 Oracle Database Cloud Service reviews

410 Views
398 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle Database Cloud Service and Amazon Aurora compete in the cloud database solutions category. Oracle appears to have the upper hand in environments requiring high-read and write performance, while Amazon Aurora excels in scalability within the AWS ecosystem.

Features: Oracle Database Cloud Service is known for comprehensive analytics, robust security, and seamless high availability, making it ideal for enterprise needs. Amazon Aurora offers automatic performance tuning, high availability, and compatibility with MySQL and PostgreSQL, particularly effective in environments needing AWS integration. Oracle stands out with advanced security and analytics, whereas Amazon Aurora offers ease of integration and auto-scaling functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Database Cloud Service could improve by simplifying deployment processes, enhancing compatibility with non-Oracle systems, and reducing costs for small to medium businesses. Amazon Aurora could enhance support for hybrid environments, provide more intuitive management interfaces for non-AWS experts, and offer expanded documentation for technical optimizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Database Cloud Service may present a steeper learning curve but offers extensive guidance with a strong support system. Amazon Aurora benefits from a simpler deployment process within AWS's ecosystem, with intuitive customer service particularly accessible for AWS users.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Database Cloud Service has higher initial setup costs but delivers strong ROI for data-intensive applications needing reliable performance. Amazon Aurora’s pricing model is attractive for scalable solutions, offering lower setup costs and efficient AWS operations, resulting in a different yet notable ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 2.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Cloud Service is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon Aurora	2.7%
Oracle Database Cloud Service	0.9%
Other	96.4%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Adnan Shafiq

Associate Vice President - Database Management (Principal Solutions Architect) at Northbay

High availability and geographical redundancy ensure reliable performance and cost efficiency

Amazon Aurora provides up to fifteen to sixteen read replicas. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring high availability and geographical redundancy, which can be considered a GR instead of a DR. As a managed service, maintenance tasks like backup and restore are handled by AWS, saving my organization significant time and money. Additionally, its fast cloning feature allows us to create a new clone from a large database swiftly, similar to a zero-copy cloning feature in Snowflake. This makes Amazon Aurora a compelling choice for my organization.

Read full review

Ajeet-Sachan

Architect at Sony Pictures Entertainment

Self-maintenance features reduce downtime and improve efficiency but enterprise edition limits can be restrictive

The availability of different editions within Oracle Database Cloud Service could be improved. The model divides their standard edition versus enterprise editions into two categories and limits the standard edition on a particular configuration set. This limitation, such as the thirty-two vCPU limit, should be removed. Another area for improvement is the affordability of the enterprise version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Aurora's best features are about scaling up and scaling down, which is perfect."

"Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively."

"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

"Aurora's features that I find the most beneficial include its database backup strategy, performance options, and input-output operations."

"My overall experience with Amazon Aurora is very positive. I rate it ten out of ten for its reliability and efficiency."

"Amazon Aurora is built on community databases and AWS has added additional features to it, allowing customers to have enterprise-level features at a lower cost."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product."

"I recommend Oracle Database Cloud Service as a good technology with excellent support and documentation."

"What I like best about Oracle Database Cloud Service is its nice performance. My company doesn't have any problems with the service. The technical support for it is also good. My company is satisfied with Oracle Database Cloud Service. I also like the availability of the service. It's a trustworthy service. I didn't experience any downtime from it. My company also has additional features included in the contract, such as WAP, which makes operations easier. My team can implement all the architecture with the features and services that Oracle Database Cloud Service offers. Technically, this is a very, very, good product or database, whether on-premises or on the cloud."

"I am impressed with the product's partitioning and advanced data card."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Database Cloud Service are its scalability, advanced technology, cost-effectiveness, and the flexibility it provides with licensing."

"Some advantages of Oracle Database Cloud Service are its availability, performance, and affordability."

"The product’s most valuable feature is affordable pricing compared to other providers."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Database Cloud Service is its cloud capabilities."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service pros

Cons

"There are tuning challenges."

"A challenge I noticed is during migration from PostgreSQL RDS to Amazon Aurora. There are technical challenges, such as the inability to provision the database using a PostgreSQL snapshot directly."

"One of the most valuable features is storage scaling."

"Room for improvement might be in the UI, integrations, or data working capabilities for better user experience."

"I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues."

"In Oracle, tools like Veridata allow for comparing databases and certifying data accuracy, even offering repair capabilities, which are missing in Aurora. There should be a similar comparison tool in Aurora."

"I don't use Amazon Aurora's global database feature; I just use the local feature."

"While Amazon Aurora meets your current scaling and storage needs, there is room for improvement in cryptography and scalability compared to other databases."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"The initial setup is a bit complex for the beginner, so you need a little technical experience to install it."

"Oracle should work on the solution's compatibility issues with the operating system."

"Oracle Database Cloud Service could improve by adding some cross-region replication features."

"The pricing must be improved."

"Oracle Database Cloud Service has room for improvement in handling large-scale applications."

"The availability of different editions within Oracle Database Cloud Service could be improved."

"In my opinion, the price of Oracle Database Cloud Service should be more affordable. Additionally, the interface of the application could be more user-friendly."

"It would be nice to have a data dictionary reporting feature in the solution."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"It is quite expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Every year we are increasing the price of the solution. There is hardware licensing available. We pay approximately $20,000 monthly to use the solution."

"Price is always higher for all Oracle products."

"The tool is not cheap."

"The product has reasonable pricing. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"Pricing for Oracle Database Cloud Service could be more competitive. Lately, pricing for it has been increasing, so my company may have to review different options to find a solution with competitive pricing. From what I know, there's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees for Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"I think the program is rather expensive, so I would like to see it becoming more affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

The pricing for Amazon Aurora is different from DocumentDB because DocumentDB is cheaper. However, when you manage the administration more closely, you can control costs better with Amazon Aurora. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

I would like to see some tutorials from Amazon for Aurora because I'm too new to it. I believe Amazon can make more tutorials for the product since there's a lot of reading required, and a short tu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Cloud Service?

Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Cloud Service?

In my opinion, the price of Oracle Database Cloud Service should be more affordable. Additionally, the interface of the application could be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Database Cloud Service?

I primarily use Oracle Database Cloud Service in HR services, collaborating with other teams on projects. It is used for database management for clients, especially in HR solutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 14% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 8% of the time

CockroachDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

Neon vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

Kinetica vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 32% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 31% of the time

More Oracle Database Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

September 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

September 2025

Download Oracle Database Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Database Exadata Cloud Service (Exadata Service) delivers the world's best Cloud Database Platform by combining the world's #1 database with Exadata, the most powerful database platform, and adding all the simplicity and cost effectiveness of the public cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Kagool, iPoint-Systems

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

September 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.