Top 10 CockroachDB Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

13 reviews
84% willing to recommend

Top CockroachDB Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CockroachDB based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SQL Server, Teradata, and MySQL. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

CockroachDB surpasses its competitors by offering seamless scalability, high availability, and strong consistency, ensuring that applications perform efficiently even during network interruptions and node failures, delivering robust solutions for demanding business environments.

Cockroach Labs Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cockroach Labs, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

SQL Server

4.2 out of 5

SQL Server

4.2 out of 5

SQL Server offers advanced OLAP services and ease of administration for scalability needs. In comparison, CockroachDB provides high fault tolerance and geo-partitioning. SQL Server suits comprehensive workload solutions, whereas CockroachDB appeals to those prioritizing geographic decentralization and affordable pricing.

Download CockroachDB vs. SQL Server Report

Pricing

SQL Server has a higher setup cost, while CockroachDB offers a more economical option for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

SQL Server has a higher setup cost, while CockroachDB offers a more economical option for initial deployment.

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

Teradata

4.1 out of 5

Teradata offers robust features for data warehousing and scalability, despite high costs and complex deployment. In comparison, CockroachDB excels in resiliency and cloud-native scalability, offering simpler deployment, though it needs improved enterprise features and more competitive pricing for broader appeal.

Download CockroachDB vs. Teradata Report

Pricing

Teradata's setup cost can be significantly higher than CockroachDB, which offers more budget-friendly options.

View comparison

Pricing

Teradata's setup cost can be significantly higher than CockroachDB, which offers more budget-friendly options.

MySQL

4.1 out of 5

MySQL

4.1 out of 5

MySQL excels in multi-threaded architecture and robust SQL compatibility, ideal for web applications. In comparison, CockroachDB's high fault tolerance and distributed SQL make it suitable for scalable, resilient applications across data centers, addressing geo-partitioning and high-demand workloads effectively. Both cater to different deployment preferences.

Download CockroachDB vs. MySQL Report

Pricing

MySQL offers lower setup costs compared to CockroachDB, which has higher initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

MySQL offers lower setup costs compared to CockroachDB, which has higher initial investment requirements.

Oracle Database

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Database

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Database is renowned for its extensive features and reliability, suiting large enterprises valuing comprehensive functionality. In comparison, CockroachDB shines with its cloud-native design and cost-effectiveness, appealing to businesses prioritizing distributed solutions and scalability over exhaustive feature sets.

Download CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Report

Pricing

Oracle Database typically has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set and robust performance, while CockroachDB offers a more cost-effective setup, suitable for those seeking a scalable and distributed database solution.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP HANA

4.2 out of 5

SAP HANA

4.2 out of 5

SAP HANA offers high-speed analytics and seamless SAP integration, ideal for enterprises managing vast data. In comparison, CockroachDB provides high fault-tolerance and geo-replication, suiting open-source enthusiasts needing distributed cloud solutions with PostgreSQL compatibility.

Download CockroachDB vs. SAP HANA Report

Pricing

SAP HANA has a higher setup cost, reflecting its robust enterprise-grade features, while CockroachDB offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to startups and small businesses focusing on scalability and resilience.

View comparison

Pricing

MariaDB

4.1 out of 5

MariaDB

4.1 out of 5

MariaDB offers ease of implementation and affordability, excelling in scalability and open-source flexibility. In comparison, CockroachDB provides automatic fault tolerance and geo-partitioning, ideal for applications needing high availability across locations, with strong disaster recovery and technical support enhancing its appeal to tech buyers.

Download CockroachDB vs. MariaDB Report

Pricing

MariaDB offers lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while CockroachDB requires a higher initial investment to benefit from its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

MariaDB offers lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while CockroachDB requires a higher initial investment to benefit from its advanced features.

IBM Db2 Database

4.1 out of 5

IBM Db2 Database

4.1 out of 5

IBM Db2 Database offers advanced SQL features, stability, and scalability, appealing to users seeking reliability. In comparison, CockroachDB's modern distributed architecture, ease of use, and cost-efficient licensing attract those prioritizing flexibility and affordability in distributed environments.

Download CockroachDB vs. IBM Db2 Database Report

Pricing

IBM Db2 Database has a higher setup cost, while CockroachDB offers a more economical setup option, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenditure. These pricing disparities may impact preference depending on budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

SingleStore

4.4 out of 5

SingleStore

4.4 out of 5

Organizations utilize SingleStore for efficient data management across transactional and analytical workloads, enabling seamless MySQL transition and scalable operations. Its distributed architecture ensures high concurrency and SQL handling. Auto reinstallation and robust pipelines enhance performance. Challenges include data distribution and SQL feature expansion, with user-friendly documentation and onboarding needed to support adoption.

Pricing

I would advise users to try the free 128GB version.

SingleStore is a bit expensive.

View comparison

Pricing

I would advise users to try the free 128GB version.

SingleStore is a bit expensive.

Amazon Aurora

4.2 out of 5

Amazon Aurora

4.2 out of 5

CockroachDB excels in high fault-tolerance and geo-partitioning with PostgreSQL compatibility and flexible deployment. In comparison, Amazon Aurora offers exceptional speed, seamless AWS integration, and managed services, making it appealing for those within the AWS ecosystem.

Download Amazon Aurora vs. CockroachDB Report

Pricing

CockroachDB typically features a higher setup cost compared to Amazon Aurora's relatively lower initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost differentiation between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

CockroachDB typically features a higher setup cost compared to Amazon Aurora's relatively lower initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost differentiation between the two solutions.

Citus Data

4.0 out of 5

Citus Data

4.0 out of 5

Citus Data enables cost-effective scaling of PostgreSQL for seamless analytics. In comparison, CockroachDB excels with strong consistency and automated scaling, ideal for tech buyers desiring high availability. Citus Data's support and pricing appeal to those prioritizing affordability over comprehensive features.

Download Citus Data vs. CockroachDB Report

Pricing

Citus Data setup costs include flexible deployment with manageable expenses, while CockroachDB entails potentially higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Citus Data setup costs include flexible deployment with manageable expenses, while CockroachDB entails potentially higher initial investment.

Show 4 more products

Related categories

Relational Databases Tools

Vector Databases

Customer Experience Management