CockroachDB vs Infobright DB comparison

Cockroach Labs and IgniteTech are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach Labs is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while IgniteTech is ranked #36. Cockroach Labs holds a 3.7% mindshare in SQL, compared to IgniteTech’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Cockroach Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IgniteTech users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 13 CockroachDB reviews

4,611 Views
3,689 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews

2,204 Views
1,146 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Infobright DB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Infobright DB and CockroachDB are both competitors in the database solutions sector, targeting different aspects of data management. CockroachDB seems to have the upper hand in offering advanced capabilities due to its robust features and scalability compared to Infobright DB's focus on affordability.

Features: Infobright DB offers analytical capabilities optimized for read-heavy data processing, making it suitable for data warehousing. It has a fast processing speed due to the columnar database architecture and offers ease of use similar to MySQL. CockroachDB features strong horizontal scaling, multi-region support, and an automatic rebalancing feature. Its compatibility with PostgreSQL and distributed nature enhances fault tolerance and high availability.

Room for Improvement: Infobright DB could improve in supporting more dynamic and varied workloads and enhancing integration capabilities with broader systems. It also might need better adaptation for cloud environments. CockroachDB can work on simplifying deployment, the learning curve for complex queries, and fine-tuning query execution to prevent unexpected performances across large distributed setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infobright DB is known for its straightforward deployment, benefiting those seeking simplicity with efficient query performance. While CockroachDB has a more complex deployment model requiring a cloud-native setup, it is ideal for scalability and resilience. Both products provide competent customer service, but CockroachDB's support excels in addressing complex technical issues.

Pricing and ROI: Infobright DB offers a lower initial setup cost, providing quick returns for projects with fixed frameworks. CockroachDB, although more expensive, potentially offers a higher long-term ROI thanks to its scalability and operational robustness, making it appealing for enterprises expecting significant data growth and variability.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. Infobright DB Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Infobright DB

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (19th), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (11th)

Infobright DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.7%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infobright DB is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CockroachDB	3.7%
Infobright DB	1.4%
Other	94.9%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Shivam Chauhan

Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides developer-friendly environment with robust security and cost-efficiency

The platform should provide a UI feature where users have the ability to manage it. The CockroachDB platform should have a chatbot where users can inquire about pricing or seek solutions for queries, rather than relying on email support. The current UI only provides SQL playground, which is technical. There should be a UI playground where users with limited technical knowledge can run and update queries, similar to phpMyAdmin or Adminer. Latency optimization could be improved for globally distributed applications, particularly in query routing. For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking. The disadvantages include cost-efficiency with multi-region deployment and schema migration speed, which should be faster compared to other drivers. The query optimizer should handle complex queries better through the UI interface.

Read full review

it_user708987

MySQL DBA at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Excellent reporting server that is compatible with MySQL

We ran into some quirks that Infobright had. We interacted with Infobright's support and were able to resolve them. There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance). This would mean that redundancy is something you need to implement yourself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CockroachDB is a best practice for my organization."

"The product has valuable security features."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"What I like best is its ability to solve data residency issues. The main advantage is auto geo partitioning, built into the product. This means we don't have to spin up separate servers in each region, which would be much more costly."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

More CockroachDB pros

"ICE helped us improve the speed for the “group-by” query by 10x."

"The high compression and the relatively fast load for a free product."

"Infobright allowed us to reduce the number of moving parts and complexity that we had while providing good performance to produce our reports."

"Infobright gave us the ability to avoid significant changes in our data structure and just use Infobright like BigDataMySql."

"It is very straightforward and easy to work with."

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"

"The performance of ad hoc aggregation queries is superior to any RDBMS that I have used and I have used them all."

"A valuable feature was the use of a columnar database for large, ever-growing, big datasets."

More Infobright DB pros

Cons

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

More CockroachDB cons

"After all the re-work to our product to remove as much reliance on Infobright, and the extra hardware costs we had to absorb, there was definitely a negative return on investment."

"There was no scalability at all. Infobright didn't permit any changes in tables."

"When running a complex subquery, the system hangs without giving the user any response."

"There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance)."

"We didn’t purchase the Enterprise Edition because it was too expensive for a product that wasn’t going to replace our main DWH database (Oracle), but was, somehow, only an addition for it."

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

"MPP, distributed processing!!! And better integration with Hadoop."

"On the contrary, we have switched back to the MS SSAS Tabular Model, because of pricing policy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

We have been using CockroachDB for the last two years. From 2023, we started working on a product similar to Google Capture. We decided to work with CockroachDB with Hasura. Hasura is a UI for the ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CockroachDB?

The tech support deserves a rating of nine out of ten. My overall rating for CockroachDB is 8 out of 10.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 12% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs CockroachDB

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 6% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 6% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Infobright DB

Compared 10% of the time

MySQL vs Infobright DB

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Infobright DB

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs Infobright DB

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon RDS on Outposts vs Infobright DB

Compared 5% of the time

More Infobright DB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

August 2026

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB

July 2026

Download Infobright DB product report

Also Known As

No data available

Infobright

Overview

CockroachDB is a high-performance, cloud-native database offering fault-tolerance, geo-partitioning, and PostgreSQL compatibility, ensuring distributed transactions with robust security for global applications.

CockroachDB offers advanced features like geo-replication and ensures data residency through its distributed architecture. This minimizes application modifications by supporting the PostgreSQL wire protocol while providing enhanced fault-tolerance. High availability is maintained through automatic node syncing and workload distribution. Security is prioritized with SSL certificates and role-based access control, facilitating ease of use and observability through an intuitive interface. Despite its capabilities, areas like documentation, disaster recovery, and high availability are improving, with an emphasis on enhanced protocol support and serverless offerings.

What are CockroachDB's key features?

Geo-Partitioning: Supports data residency and speeds up processing through regional distribution.
PostgreSQL Compatibility: Minimizes app modifications with wire protocol support.
Distributed Architecture: Offers automatic rebalancing, node syncing, and workload distribution.
Security Features: Includes SSL certificates and role-based access control.
ACID Transactions: Ensures transactional integrity across distributed systems.

What benefits should users expect?

Scalability: Facilitates cloud-native scaling, simplifying operations.
Data Residency: Offers compliance with regional data laws through geo-replication.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces complexity, enhancing resource allocation.
High Availability: Supports real-time processing for high-velocity applications.
Compatibility: Ensures smooth integration with existing PostgreSQL setups.

CockroachDB finds application across industries such as fintech and media, where distributed transactions and high availability are critical. It's ideal for platforms requiring real-time data processing, like credit scoring and music streaming, thanks to its scalability, resilience, and top-tier security.

Cockroach Labs

Infobright DB is an established column-oriented database management system known for its analytical prowess in storing and managing large volumes of data efficiently.

Designed to handle intense data workloads, Infobright DB supports data warehousing and business intelligence operations. It is favored for its efficient use of storage and processing capabilities, making it an ideal choice for companies analyzing massive datasets. Infobright DB's analytic algorithms and data compression techniques make it suitable for enterprises seeking to process queries rapidly.

What are the essential features of Infobright DB?

Columnar Storage: Optimizes read performance by storing data in columns.
Data Compression: Reduces storage needs with advanced compression techniques.
Query Performance: Enhances speed through automatic query optimization.
Scalability: Handles terabytes of data without compromising performance.
Self-Management: Minimizes administrative tasks with automated maintenance.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Infobright DB?

Cost Efficiency: Lower storage costs due to high data compression.
Improved Analytics: Faster data insights lead to better decision-making.
Resource Optimization: Requires fewer resources for maintenance and scaling.
Operational Simplicity: Ease of integration with existing systems.

Infobright DB is prevalent in industries like finance and telecommunications, providing robust data analysis and reporting capabilities. Its ability to manage large datasets efficiently makes it suitable for sectors needing real-time analytics and deep data insights.

IgniteTech

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Infobright DB

August 2026

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. Infobright DB

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. Infobright DB and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. Infobright DB report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.