CockroachDB vs IBM Informix comparison

Cockroach Labs and IBM are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach Labs is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #25 with an average rating of 4.0. Cockroach Labs holds a 3.7% mindshare in SQL, compared to IBM’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Cockroach Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 13 CockroachDB reviews

4,611 Views
3,689 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

IBM Informix

Read 17 IBM Informix reviews

2,383 Views
2,192 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

IBM Informix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

IBM Informix and CockroachDB compete in the database management sector. CockroachDB tends to have an advantage due to its modern features and scalability, which suit large-scale deployments, while Informix is favored for pricing and support.

Features: IBM Informix excels in strong data processing capabilities, robust security, and exceptional performance in managing complex transactions. It supports diverse programming languages and environments. CockroachDB is distinguished by its distributed SQL capabilities, seamless horizontal scaling, and automatic failover, efficiently handling global data distribution. The main differentiation is CockroachDB's adaptability to distributed systems versus Informix's focus on traditional transactional performance.

Room for Improvement: IBM Informix could enhance its cloud-native capabilities and improve ease of scalability. Additionally, its learning curve could be reduced for new users. CockroachDB could expand its customer support offerings and improve integration with legacy systems. Also, optimization for handling smaller, less distributed datasets could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Informix offers a flexible deployment model compatible with on-premises and cloud setups, with comprehensive support praised for proactive assistance. CockroachDB's deployment is inherently cloud-native, optimizing scaling across regions with minimal manual intervention. Its customer service benefits from excellent documentation and community support, despite being less comprehensive than Informix.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Informix usually requires a higher upfront investment, reflecting its enterprise-grade features, yet delivers solid ROI in complex infrastructures. CockroachDB presents more competitive pricing for cloud deployments, promoting better ROI through scalable pay-as-you-go models. While CockroachDB excels in cost efficiency in dynamic environments, Informix offers value in extensive, tailored implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. IBM Informix Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. IBM Informix

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,647 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (19th), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (11th)

IBM Informix

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.7%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Informix is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CockroachDB	3.7%
IBM Informix	1.8%
Other	94.5%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Shivam Chauhan

Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides developer-friendly environment with robust security and cost-efficiency

The platform should provide a UI feature where users have the ability to manage it. The CockroachDB platform should have a chatbot where users can inquire about pricing or seek solutions for queries, rather than relying on email support. The current UI only provides SQL playground, which is technical. There should be a UI playground where users with limited technical knowledge can run and update queries, similar to phpMyAdmin or Adminer. Latency optimization could be improved for globally distributed applications, particularly in query routing. For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking. The disadvantages include cost-efficiency with multi-region deployment and schema migration speed, which should be faster compared to other drivers. The query optimizer should handle complex queries better through the UI interface.

Read full review

Nasir Niamat

DB Consultant at i2c

Has offered a cost-effective option despite frequent technical issues and limited market demand

We find some bugs in IBM Informix. Maybe we are using it more aggressively than others. Every month or every second month, we find some bugs in it, which is not ideal. It should be rare, not this frequent. The good thing is they cover those bugs in the next release within weeks or days on demand. IBM Informix should become hybrid and should include AI features similar to other DBMS systems such as Snowflake, Redshift, and DataBricks. This would help its value rise with the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"CockroachDB is excellent for managing relationships in RDBMS with multiple benefits such as the ability to create views and dynamic queries that save data and reduce the use of complex algorithms in code."

"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"CockroachDB is highly reliable."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

More CockroachDB pros

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"So far, we do not have a lot of issues. It's pretty problem-free."

"Replication, all levels of replication, query charting, and the MongoDB embedded are the most valuable features of this solution."

"Overall, this is a great product. It works really well, is very stable, and is very scalable."

"My advice is to take it; you will never regret it."

"Flexible Grid provides the ability to automatically create database objects, such as tables, indexes, and stored procedures on all nodes within the grid as a single operation."

"The scalability is very good."

"This solution has made financial reporting possible by allowing financial people the opportunity to set Informix to "Auto Pilot" so that they can attend other duties."

More IBM Informix pros

Cons

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

"For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

More CockroachDB cons

"This product could be made easier to use for beginners."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

"The solution really doesn't add new features very often. Other solutions are much more actively pushing out upgrades and improvements."

"Continue extending the SQL language for compatibility with the competition's language, including Stored Procedure Language."

"The technical support services need substantial improvement."

"The solution should offer replication. It would be helpful if the solution would allow us to access third-party tools."

"This solution is in need of more current tools."

"Informix is very sturdy, but the problem for us is the marketing action around Informix."

More IBM Informix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"I am not aware of the licensing costs or terms."

"The product has reasonable pricing. We purchase its yearly license."

"For me, it's always too expensive."

"The free edition can be enough to handle moderate-size implementations, but you may want a pay for edition to benefit from more functionality, such as replication."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

We have been using CockroachDB for the last two years. From 2023, we started working on a product similar to Google Capture. We decided to work with CockroachDB with Hasura. Hasura is a UI for the ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CockroachDB?

The tech support deserves a rating of nine out of ten. My overall rating for CockroachDB is 8 out of 10.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Informix?

There is a cost reason to move from IBM Informix. It is relatively cheaper than Oracle. The second reason is that moving the whole application to a new database would require significant cost. The ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Informix?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Informix?

We are using IBM Informix for OLTP systems. We are using IBM Informix although it is a technology that is not very popular compared to others. We are using it because our application was initially ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 12% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs CockroachDB

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 6% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 6% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

SQL Server vs IBM Informix

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs IBM Informix

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database vs IBM Informix

Compared 17% of the time

Actian Ingres vs IBM Informix

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA vs IBM Informix

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Informix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

August 2026

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Informix

August 2026

Download IBM Informix product report

Also Known As

No data available

Informix

Overview

CockroachDB is a high-performance, cloud-native database offering fault-tolerance, geo-partitioning, and PostgreSQL compatibility, ensuring distributed transactions with robust security for global applications.

CockroachDB offers advanced features like geo-replication and ensures data residency through its distributed architecture. This minimizes application modifications by supporting the PostgreSQL wire protocol while providing enhanced fault-tolerance. High availability is maintained through automatic node syncing and workload distribution. Security is prioritized with SSL certificates and role-based access control, facilitating ease of use and observability through an intuitive interface. Despite its capabilities, areas like documentation, disaster recovery, and high availability are improving, with an emphasis on enhanced protocol support and serverless offerings.

What are CockroachDB's key features?

Geo-Partitioning: Supports data residency and speeds up processing through regional distribution.
PostgreSQL Compatibility: Minimizes app modifications with wire protocol support.
Distributed Architecture: Offers automatic rebalancing, node syncing, and workload distribution.
Security Features: Includes SSL certificates and role-based access control.
ACID Transactions: Ensures transactional integrity across distributed systems.

What benefits should users expect?

Scalability: Facilitates cloud-native scaling, simplifying operations.
Data Residency: Offers compliance with regional data laws through geo-replication.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces complexity, enhancing resource allocation.
High Availability: Supports real-time processing for high-velocity applications.
Compatibility: Ensures smooth integration with existing PostgreSQL setups.

CockroachDB finds application across industries such as fintech and media, where distributed transactions and high availability are critical. It's ideal for platforms requiring real-time data processing, like credit scoring and music streaming, thanks to its scalability, resilience, and top-tier security.

Cockroach Labs

IBM Informix is renowned for its high performance and reliability, especially optimized for OLTP settings. Supporting large data volumes with scalability and advanced data management features, Informix efficiently integrates SQL and NoSQL capabilities within hybrid environments.

IBM Informix provides comprehensive capabilities tailored for robust database management and industry applications. Designed for handling concurrent data processing, its advanced replication, data compression, and seamless scalability are key highlights. Despite facing challenges such as less replication enhancement and SQL compatibility, Informix remains crucial for sectors like healthcare, banking, and government, integrating effectively with Unix-based systems. While some users seek improved AI features, enhanced tools, and simpler administration, Informix stands as a reliable choice for demanding data tasks.

What are the main features of IBM Informix?

Advanced Data Replication: Facilitates efficient data management across different environments.
Scalability: Offers both horizontal and vertical scaling for handling growth and complexity.
Data Compression: Reduces storage needs, saving resources while enhancing performance.
Hybrid Data Capabilities: Allows integration of SQL and NoSQL for varied data needs.

What benefits should users expect from IBM Informix?

High Performance: Optimized for OLTP, ensuring quick data transactions and processing.
Reliability: Stable performance even under demanding conditions, maintaining data integrity.
Cost Efficiency: Handles large data volumes with minimal resources, reducing overall costs.
Ease of Management: Simplifies complex database scenarios, enhancing operational efficiency.

IBM Informix plays a central role in sectors such as healthcare, banking, telecommunications, and government by supporting crucial operations through data processing, replication, and backup tasks. Its ability to integrate into Unix-based systems makes it widely adopted for applications, analytics, and real-time industry needs, especially in organizations focusing on OLTP systems.

IBM

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Shaspa, Hildebrand, Kaifa, Ranhill Powertron, Federaci‹ Farmacutica (FedeFarma), Camden Council, The German Aerospace Center (DLR), Myers, Votorantim Group, Doosan Infracore, GreenIvory

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. IBM Informix

August 2026

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. IBM Informix

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. IBM Informix and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. IBM Informix report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.