Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.9% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 20 Amazon Aurora reviews

2,027 Views
1,986 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 21 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

417 Views
200 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and Amazon Aurora compete in the cloud-based database solutions category, each targeting distinct organizational needs. Amazon Aurora seems to have the upper hand due to its superior scalability and performance.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers robust data management, seamless Oracle ecosystem integration, and strong support channels. Amazon Aurora features high availability, automatic scaling, and deep integration with AWS services, appealing to users seeking an AWS-centric solution.

Room for Improvement: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service could enhance interoperability with non-Oracle products and improve scalability for dynamic workloads. It might also benefit from streamlined maintenance operations. Amazon Aurora could improve cost efficiency for smaller setups, enhance user-friendliness for AWS newcomers, and provide greater transparency in pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers straightforward deployment with extensive Oracle support. Amazon Aurora benefits from a highly automated deployment process and easily integrates with AWS management tools, providing a smooth experience for AWS-seasoned teams.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides cost-effective options with flexible pricing plans, ensuring a predictable investment and prompt ROI. Amazon Aurora, though potentially higher in initial costs, justifies its expense with performance efficiency and low maintenance, promising long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 2.9%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Adnan Shafiq

Associate Vice President - Database Management (Principal Solutions Architect) at Northbay

High availability and geographical redundancy ensure reliable performance and cost efficiency

Amazon Aurora provides up to fifteen to sixteen read replicas. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring high availability and geographical redundancy, which can be considered a GR instead of a DR. As a managed service, maintenance tasks like backup and restore are handled by AWS, saving my organization significant time and money. Additionally, its fast cloning feature allows us to create a new clone from a large database swiftly, similar to a zero-copy cloning feature in Snowflake. This makes Amazon Aurora a compelling choice for my organization.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Aurora stands out for its ease of use in a managed environment, inbuilt security, continuous backups, numerous read replicas, multi-region automated replication, and seamless integration with other AWS services."

"Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code."

"Amazon Aurora's best features are about scaling up and scaling down, which is perfect."

"Aurora's features that I find the most beneficial include its database backup strategy, performance options, and input-output operations."

"My overall experience with Amazon Aurora is very positive. I rate it ten out of ten for its reliability and efficiency."

"One of the most valuable features is storage scaling."

"The most valuable features of Amazon Aurora include the global instance with the global writer endpoint, which allows failovers and instance switches without requiring changes in my code, thanks to the default global Route 53 endpoint."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."

"The solution's performance is good."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

"MySQL is a centralized RDBMS in itself, and you don't have the overkill of having the full Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server. It's ideal, and it helps with the developer console. It has three versions for developers. It's a very good tool for open source."

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"All the features are excellent."

"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced."

"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."

"I don't use Amazon Aurora's global database feature; I just use the local feature."

"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

"There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired."

"I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues."

"In Oracle, tools like Veridata allow for comparing databases and certifying data accuracy, even offering repair capabilities, which are missing in Aurora. There should be a similar comparison tool in Aurora."

"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"The solution should offer memory management."

"Sometimes, we face syntax issues with the solution."

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"It is quite expensive."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"It is an open-source product."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The license is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

16%

Retailer

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

The pricing for Amazon Aurora is different from DocumentDB because DocumentDB is cheaper. However, when you manage the administration more closely, you can control costs better with Amazon Aurora. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

I would like to see some tutorials from Amazon for Aurora because I'm too new to it. I believe Amazon can make more tutorials for the product since there's a lot of reading required, and a short tu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 24% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 15% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 8% of the time

Citus Data vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

SingleStore vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 43% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 29% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

August 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

August 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

July 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.