Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.9% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 18 Amazon Aurora reviews

2,181 Views
1,427 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 21 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

210 Views
82 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and Amazon Aurora compete in the cloud-based database solutions category, each targeting distinct organizational needs. Amazon Aurora seems to have the upper hand due to its superior scalability and performance.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers robust data management, seamless Oracle ecosystem integration, and strong support channels. Amazon Aurora features high availability, automatic scaling, and deep integration with AWS services, appealing to users seeking an AWS-centric solution.

Room for Improvement: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service could enhance interoperability with non-Oracle products and improve scalability for dynamic workloads. It might also benefit from streamlined maintenance operations. Amazon Aurora could improve cost efficiency for smaller setups, enhance user-friendliness for AWS newcomers, and provide greater transparency in pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers straightforward deployment with extensive Oracle support. Amazon Aurora benefits from a highly automated deployment process and easily integrates with AWS management tools, providing a smooth experience for AWS-seasoned teams.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides cost-effective options with flexible pricing plans, ensuring a predictable investment and prompt ROI. Amazon Aurora, though potentially higher in initial costs, justifies its expense with performance efficiency and low maintenance, promising long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 2.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Adnan Shafiq

Associate Vice President - Database Management (Principal Solutions Architect) at Northbay

High availability and geographical redundancy ensure reliable performance and cost efficiency

Amazon Aurora ( /products/amazon-aurora-reviews ) provides up to fifteen to sixteen read replicas. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring high availability and geographical redundancy, which can be considered a GR instead of a DR. As a managed service, maintenance tasks like backup and restore are handled by AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ), saving my organization significant time and money. Additionally, its fast cloning feature allows us to create a new clone from a large database swiftly, similar to a zero-copy cloning feature in Snowflake ( /products/snowflake-reviews ). This makes Amazon Aurora a compelling choice for my organization.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy."

"My overall experience with Amazon Aurora is very positive. I rate it ten out of ten for its reliability and efficiency."

"One of the standout features of Amazon Aurora is that we do not need to maintain disaster recovery or manage availability zones."

"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

"The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer."

"The most valuable features of Amazon Aurora include the global instance with the global writer endpoint, which allows failovers and instance switches without requiring changes in my code, thanks to the default global Route 53 endpoint."

"The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"It's easy to use."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is flexible and is an open-source product."

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers."

"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."

"Room for improvement might be in the UI, integrations, or data working capabilities for better user experience."

"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced."

"While Amazon Aurora meets your current scaling and storage needs, there is room for improvement in cryptography and scalability compared to other databases."

"A challenge I noticed is during migration from PostgreSQL RDS to Amazon Aurora. There are technical challenges, such as the inability to provision the database using a PostgreSQL snapshot directly."

"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

"Amazon Aurora should upgrade its base PostgreSQL versions more frequently and offer all PostgreSQL extensions."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"The tool’s stability must be improved."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"The solution should offer memory management."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"It is quite expensive."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"It is an open-source product."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora is not very expensive as other solutions with similar features from other vendors come at almost the same cost. I rated it as two to three on a scale where ten is very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora should upgrade its base PostgreSQL ( /products/postgresql-reviews ) versions more frequently and offer all PostgreSQL extensions. Keeping extensions up-to-date with PostgreSQL release...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 28% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 19% of the time

Citus Data vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

YugabyteDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 59% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 41% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

June 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

June 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.