MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

MySQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. MySQL is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6. MySQL holds a 8.9% mindshare in OSD, compared to Oracle MySQL Cloud Service’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 150 MySQL reviews

8,912 Views
5,080 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 21 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

477 Views
291 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MySQL

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

MySQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service both compete in the database solutions category, with MySQL having an upper hand in affordability and open-source flexibility, while Oracle MySQL Cloud Service excels in advanced cloud features.

Features: MySQL is characterized by its multi-threaded architecture, crash recovery techniques, and strong performance in small to medium applications. Its integration capabilities with other technologies and cross-platform support make it a developer's favorite. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service boasts superior features like enhanced cloud scalability and advanced performance capabilities, ensuring reliable performance for enterprise applications.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could improve its handling of large databases and active directory integration. InnoDB complexity and performance lag compared to MyISAM are notable areas for enhancement. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while providing better storage capacity, could refine its clustering and high availability features to match the needs of larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers broad deployment options, including cloud environments, with ample community support for troubleshooting. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service focuses on seamless cloud integration and dedicated support services, though some users perceive these as costly.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is cost-effective with its free community version, though enterprise support can incur additional costs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service involves higher pricing due to premium features and maintenance costs, justified by the advanced functionalities it offers for enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

1st

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

150

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

7th

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of MySQL is 8.9%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	8.9%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	0.6%
Other	90.5%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I've been most pleased with is the cost point, performance, and ease of use."

"Support for enterprise-grade features like clustering, master-slave replication, even Sharding (to some extent) which is an advanced feature."

"The fact that it is free is what appeals to me the most."

"The solution has been very easy to scale so far."

"Setup is easy. MySQL of various flavours has community editions to easily test, deploy, and run."

"Apart from the features that are in the enterprise part, we find the database to be valuable. The connectors and the backup features are valuable as well. We use the basic database. We don't really use the extra features. Our clients like the security features in the database."

"The solution is easy to use."

"I like MySQL because of its community."

More MySQL pros

"MySQL is a centralized RDBMS in itself, and you don't have the overkill of having the full Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server. It's ideal, and it helps with the developer console. It has three versions for developers. It's a very good tool for open source."

"The solution's performance is good."

"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."

"It's easy to use."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"When it comes to supporting big data, there is space to improve upon the database engines that are supported by MySQL."

"I find the Microsoft solution a bit better. But mostly in terms of the UI layout, I would say. I just find it a little bit more efficient."

"Improvements to MySQL depend on the specific use case. For example, in my scenario, I frequently need to maintain and store data, which can then be utilized to generate reports. On the other hand, others may suggest incorporating a feature that allows for easier visualization of the data, such as what is available in Power BI or other similar tools."

"They should come up with a better solution than the NDB cluster for better scaling. If they could come up with a better solution for write scaling, apart from the NDB cluster, which is supported by all open source communities, that would be great. Although the NDB cluster, I believe, is an open-source tool, it's not widely supported as a solution."

"It requires a training platform."

"We require more ease of use, scalability, and high availability. These are some of the critical features that we use and look for in a product. It should be easier to manage clusters. Scalability is very important for us because our projects and concurrency requirements are quite big. We also require high availability of the server, application, and other things. It should also have more performance-based features or enhancements from the performance point of view. When we divide a database, it should be able to handle the queries very fast."

"MySQL has some unique exchange problems when it comes to migration projects."

"As for areas that could be improved, the tool is often used as a local database on laptops. But now, we're moving to cloud-based solutions that are more scalable and highly available. I think the tool should offer a cloud database option. This would let users keep a local copy of data if needed, but also have their data available across different regions through a cloud account."

More MySQL cons

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"Sometimes, we face syntax issues with the solution."

"The product has many bugs."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

"My company uses MySQL's corporate licenses."

"There is a license needed for this solution."

"MySQL is cheaper than Microsoft SQL Server."

"We've never bought a commercial license. We just use the open-source community edition."

"I use the open-source free community version."

"The price of the solution is good because we have a good partner."

"We pay a yearly subscription fee."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	61

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 22% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 14% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 7% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 42% of the time

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 27% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

September 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

September 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

September 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors and best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.