Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Bedrock vs NVIDIA DGX Cloud comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock
Ranking in AI Infrastructure
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (10th)
NVIDIA DGX Cloud
Ranking in AI Infrastructure
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the AI Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Amazon Bedrock is 13.7%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NVIDIA DGX Cloud is 14.2%, down from 31.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon Bedrock13.7%
NVIDIA DGX Cloud14.2%
Other72.1%
AI Infrastructure
 

Featured Reviews

RodrigoBassani - PeerSpot reviewer
Diretor at Hat Thinking
Advanced integration and flexible architecture drive efficient business solutions
I have to gain more maturity to provide some improvements to Amazon Bedrock. I have a lot to do with the environment they already provided. For example, they are able to connect to any LLM solution such as Llama, Meta, Gemini, or ChatGPT. It is open; you just choose your favorite LLM solution, and you can integrate it into Amazon Bedrock. We have a lot of possibilities to do this integration at this moment; we just need to work on it, create more maturity, and then we can provide some enhancements that we can see on the solution as a whole. For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture. They wonder if they are providing some company information that can run away, and I think that is the challenge we have now. We need to find ways to work on it and make our clients' data secure. They are looking for that to guarantee that this is a great solution for companies that is also secure.
reviewer2309676 - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead, High-Performance Computing (HPC) at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Versatile, well-built, and powerful
The initial setup of the DGX server was quite straightforward. We treated it like any other server during deployment. It went to the data center, where they set it up, placed it in the rack, and enabled it. The deployment process was familiar, using our standard tools like Foreman and Ansible. Since the operating system is supported, we didn't encounter any specific challenges. For deploying the DGX server, we typically need two people for software tasks and sometimes vendor assistance for hardware setup. The process takes about four hours, with NVIDIA firmware updates taking the most time (around two hours), and the rest dedicated to OS and Ansible deployment. Maintaining the DGX server is pretty straightforward. We treat it like any other server, with around 10% downtime, while the rest of the cluster remains up.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The no-code application of the service is beneficial since it allows creating solutions without extensive coding knowledge."
"The most valuable features of Amazon Bedrock include scalability, ease of access, having 20 to 25 plus pre-trained models, and scaling capabilities."
"Bedrock offers various foundational models in one place."
"The impact of Amazon Bedrock's sophisticated natural language processing on our company's ability to predict future outcomes is very interesting because, before we were using some Python codes, we created server instances to upload it, and we had some difficulty integrating it with the ecosystem because all the features we were creating were manually based."
"Amazon Bedrock is very easy to configure and launch, and it takes care of the creation of Docker images with CodeBuild and putting the images into the ECR repository very simply and easily with the help of Agent Core and Amazon Bedrock Agent Core."
"Bedrock proved beneficial for generating SQL queries, which helped in delivering precise information from the database."
"It is the best solution in this category and is rated a nine out of ten."
"The most beneficial aspect of Bedrock is its pool of models to choose from, catering to specific needs."
"The most valuable thing about DGX Systems is their super-fast connection."
 

Cons

"The initial setup of Amazon Bedrock is somewhat complex as it requires integration with two to three services."
"Overall, I rate Amazon Bedrock a seven out of ten. It is slightly difficult to integrate with our product."
"For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture."
"What could be improved for Amazon Bedrock to make it more mature is that AWS needs to consider bringing their platforms together, and not having different ML and AI platforms."
"While working with Bedrock, I incurred charges that were not explicitly mentioned in the pricing documentation."
"There is a need for improved documentation, smoother integration, and possibly reduced prices given the competition."
"It would be beneficial if Amazon Bedrock could provide multiple responses to a query, allowing users to choose the best option."
"The advantage of Bedrock is not as an amazing enabler of AI platforms, yet we utilize it to deploy application services and microservices within Bedrock ecosystem and leverage prequalified foundation models like Claude and others."
"One thing that could be better in DGX Systems is their power consumption."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs."
"The cost of using Amazon Bedrock is quite high, as I incurred unexpected charges amounting to $130 USD within two weeks without actually deploying the model."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?
The price of invoking the model is considerably better compared to hosting the model with our local resources. This is an advantage for Amazon Bedrock.
What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?
Currently, I do not have any negative points in mind about Amazon Bedrock because I think Amazon Bedrock and other services are good. We have to use OpenSearch as well. We have not implemented RAG ...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?
I am currently working on Amazon Bedrock Agent Core. We have created a data pipeline where we are using Amazon Bedrock Agent Core primarily for transformation. We use the agent for custom rules, tr...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
NVIDIA DGX-1, DGX Cloud, NVIDIA DGX Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Open AI, UC Berkley, New York University, Massachusetts General Hospital